Thanks
need to look at that. Severe case may be a deal breaker as most people don't have severe cases.

Edit: looked at the study, and while it is important information it does leave a lot lacking (not by their own fault, just the study design). Mainly the inclusion criteria left off all but the sicker patients, so we are dealing with a small subset of covid positive patients in this study. Nor does it deal with asymptomatic positives of which we know from prior studies is about 4-10 times the actual number of tested positives. So this subset of patients studied is really about 2.5-1% of total covid survivors (their selection states they got 9100 patients out of 110K possible due to the need for serial serological testing, and then extrapolate that down another 4-10X for prior randomized antibody sampling studies to get there).

Despite the rate of reinfection being 63 out of 9000, and only 2 of the 63 going on to die, they still strongly suggested that covid positive patients follow all the strict european and american cdc guidelines to prevent spread. That statement makes me think the authors have some bias. I might be reading into that, but it seems odd to suggest strict guidelines for what amounts to 2 out of 9000 dying (0.0002%), and that is from the sick group of positives.