You experts, give me your thoughts on this......

http://www.savagearms.com/accustockdefault.htm or

Here is something I saw on another forum. Great info and comparison between the non accustock and accustock models.
Has lots of pictures and good info. I WANT ONE.

http://www.thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=351755&highlight=ACCUSTOCK

looks realy nice might have to try one.

Hmm, looks like a variation on the aluminum bedding blocks several other makers already use. The only thing new I see is the wedge that anchors the recoil lug. Not a bad idea. I bet it works good.

Jay

I'm gonna buy one. I was on the fence between a Remington 700 and a Savage 10 in .308. I own a Savage 12 in .22-250 and have no complaints about accuracy, or user friendliness of the rifle. It looks like the Savage might be a little less expensive than the Remington and I won't have to have it accurized which saves in expense as well.

check the remington again, my wifes trigger on her 308 is adjustable

looks basically like what Ruger did. But shouldn't have to accurize a Remmy. My fiancee has one of the Rem 700 mtn rifles in a 7mm-08 and it is a sweet shooting little gun, can only imagine a 308 would be very similar.

Don't know nuthin about the accu stock, but the grand daughters a keeper. Good to see um teachin her right.

Huh? I didn't say anything about the trigger?

Sounds like a good idea, but given the comfort and aesthetic appeal of the last Savage factory stock I had, I'd probably replace the thing anyway. I can see where applying pressure in more or less of a semi-circle would be more conducive to accuracy than traditional pillar bedding. However, since most benchrest rifles that shoot 1/2 moa use good ole fashioned pillar bedding, one must ask-- Why? Seems like another answer to a question nobody asked...

I like it, from the way it sounds. Savage really does make some decent rifles, although I'm not really impressed with the accu-trigger. I don't see it as a big deal personally but opinions vary!