texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
bluebiller, Droptine3030, Lilsmokey93, hpnuge, Final Rise Outfitters
72072 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,799
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,534
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,977
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics538,193
Posts9,734,123
Members87,072
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
22-250 vs. ruger .204 #309181 02/02/08 05:52 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,125
Beer_Slayer Offline OP
Veteran Tracker
OP Offline
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,125
anyone had experience with both?



Beer of the world beware. I'll kill an 18 pack just to watch it die.
Re: 22-250 vs. ruger .204 [Re: Beer_Slayer] #309182 02/02/08 07:43 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 31,978
T
txtrophy85 Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 31,978
the .204 is a sizzling little round, but i still like the .22-250. both will drop any varmint that walks, the .22-250 with a 55 grain bullet drifts less, plus i like the comfort of knowing that if i have to i can shoot a deer with the .22-250, which i wouldn't try with a .204 unless its a doe at under 80 yards with a head shot.

but if i were a long range coyote hunter, the .204 would be hard to beat



For it is not the quarry that we truly seek, but the adventure.
Re: 22-250 vs. ruger .204 [Re: txtrophy85] #309183 02/03/08 01:54 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,966
J
jdickey Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
J
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,966
Both a great for varmints.... but the .204 may drift with just a light wind!



Bigfoot Research Specialist
http://www.texlaresearch.com/
Re: 22-250 vs. ruger .204 [Re: jdickey] #309184 02/03/08 02:26 AM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 88
S
Stinger Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
S
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 88
.204 will drift less than .224 any day.


Re: 22-250 vs. ruger .204 [Re: Stinger] #309185 02/04/08 02:42 AM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 373
B
BigGuy Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
B
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 373
Quote:

.204 will drift less than .224 any day.




And what do you base that theory on? A 40 grain 22-250 starts out about the same as a 32 grain 204. All things being equal, the heavier the projectile, the less it is affected by a crosswind. If you have something to the contrary please share it with us.



Good Luck and Good Hunting.
Re: 22-250 vs. ruger .204 [Re: Stinger] #309186 02/04/08 06:56 AM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,175
Y
yukons95 Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
Y
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,175
The .224 in no way will it drift more than a .204!!!!


Re: 22-250 vs. ruger .204 [Re: Stinger] #309187 02/04/08 04:06 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,125
Beer_Slayer Offline OP
Veteran Tracker
OP Offline
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,125
thanks guys. is the 22-250 too big for foxes and such?


Re: 22-250 vs. ruger .204 [Re: Beer_Slayer] #309188 02/04/08 05:11 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,566
C
CurtisCatfish Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
C
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,566
I would recomend the 22-250 too. It is not to big if you use the right ammo. Just don't use hollow points, they explode and tear everything up. Light soft point ammo will work. You want it to go through fast without having time to expand.


Re: 22-250 vs. ruger .204 [Re: CurtisCatfish] #309189 02/05/08 05:00 AM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,175
Y
yukons95 Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
Y
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,175
53 grain barnes tsx's for hogs and deer! 40 grain ballistic tips for varmints! the barnes at around 3700 f.p.s. while the ballistic tips close to 4000 f.p.s. Thats all you need in Texas!!!


Re: 22-250 vs. ruger .204 [Re: yukons95] #309190 02/05/08 12:33 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 65
M
MarkA Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
M
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 65
I have had both. I no longer have the 204. It is a great round, but it is expensive and I dunno, just did not do it for me. The 22-250 will do almost ANYTHING in Texas. It is a great varmint rifle and with the size of most of our White Tail and Super deer, antelope rifle. I reloaded for the 204 and had fun with it, the cost and more of dedicated varmint gun moved it away from my favorite list and into the sale rack in about a year.



Thanks and Gig'em Mark A. Fairchild
Re: 22-250 vs. ruger .204 [Re: MarkA] #309191 02/05/08 05:51 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,450
F
FoxTrot Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
F
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,450
22-250 is a better all around gun. I love the 204 though. Hard choice. Stricly varmints...204, all game in Texas...22-250



Originally Posted By: Chief Joe
I avoid Dick's and hope they fold.
Re: 22-250 vs. ruger .204 [Re: FoxTrot] #309192 02/06/08 02:41 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 74
M
meatcutter Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
M
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 74
Nosler makes a 22 cal 60 gr partition if you do any handloading, I'm shooting 55 gr ballistic tips in mine. If any one has shot the 60 gr partition I would be interested in how it shoots.

22-250 for me, you can't beat it.


Re: 22-250 vs. ruger .204 [Re: meatcutter] #309193 02/06/08 06:12 AM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,175
Y
yukons95 Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
Y
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,175
I did alot of r&d on the 22-250 these past two years. me and a friend both shoot it. we tried all the possible deer bullets, barnes-x and tsx triple shocks, nosler partitions, trophy bonded bear claw. the barnes tsx and nosler partition were both excellent! both pretty accurate great penetration. both broke the shoulders on the way out! at around 150 yards. the barnes-x and the bear claws the same but kind of poor accuracy. another friend of ours swears by his sierra 55 grain soft point boattail gamekings those are handloaded only. he says every powder he has used has given him excellent accuracy with great penetration..hope this helped somewhat if you have any more questions let me know? just pm


Re: 22-250 vs. ruger .204 [Re: meatcutter] #309194 02/06/08 05:37 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,264
F
fowlplayr Offline
Shenanigans Scorecard keeper
Offline
Shenanigans Scorecard keeper
F
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,264
Quote:

Nosler makes a 22 cal 60 gr partition if you do any handloading, I'm shooting 55 gr ballistic tips in mine. If any one has shot the 60 gr partition I would be interested in how it shoots.




I've tried the Federal 60gr. partitions in my 22-250. My Weatherby Vanguard Sub-MOA doesn't particularly like the longer, heavier bullets. Best I could get out of them was 1" groups, vs. 1/4" groups with the ballistic tips.

I did shoulder shoot a couple of big boars with the partitions a couple of weeks ago and dropped both of them in there tracks (250lbs at 90 yards and 300lbs at 204 yards). Neither bullet exited but apparently it did a great job. You certainly would not get even close to similar results with the ballistic tips.

If your gun will stabilize the 60gr partitions, or if you can give a little on accuracy, I think that you would have a great round for Texas hunting.


Re: 22-250 vs. ruger .204 [Re: fowlplayr] #309195 02/06/08 07:41 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 547
W
west tex Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
W
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 547
This has been hashed out on about every varmint hunting board out there just do some research. Both are great rounds but you are comparing apples to oranges. If you are strictly shooting coyote size and smaller animals both will do. I wouldn’t worry about wind drift because if you’re asking this question then you won’t be shooting at any distances that it would matter. While I have taken deer and pigs cleanly w/ a 204 I would not recommend it as they were targets of opportunity. While not knowing you I am going to make the prediction that you won’t be shooting enough that the price of ammo will come into effect. So just ask yourself what you expect the use of this rifle will primarily be. If you want just varmints neither will let you down. If you want a more all around gun the 250


Re: 22-250 vs. ruger .204 [Re: west tex] #309196 02/07/08 12:28 AM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 31,978
T
txtrophy85 Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 31,978
Quote:

While I have taken deer and pigs cleanly w/ a 204 I would not recommend it as they were targets of opportunity.




heard some city slicker from houston going on and on about his new .204 at the diner in town. says he shoots does and cull bucks with it. how'd it work for you?



For it is not the quarry that we truly seek, but the adventure.
Re: 22-250 vs. ruger .204 [Re: txtrophy85] #309197 02/07/08 01:33 AM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 547
W
west tex Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
W
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 547
The does were shot for managment reasons and all were shot from the truck in the head. and the hog was just in the wrong place at the wrong time he was shot while taking a drive around the ranch at a little over 300 yrds once in the neck and ran about 40 yrds. It will kill them but there are plenty of better calibers out there.


Re: 22-250 vs. ruger .204 [Re: west tex] #309198 02/14/08 06:31 AM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 50
J
jmac Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
J
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 50
I stuck a little bitty axis doe about an inch low of the eye as it was looking at me at about 40 yards with a 32 grainer out of my 204. It did the trick, but I decided to skin it all the way down to the nose to see what the bullet did, and was fairly dissapointed. a fragment exited on the other right side of the skull, just under the eye, but I couldn't find any other damage. The skull was still solid, which is the first time I've ever seen that. Even a 223 will usually make them mush. Normally I like the smaller calibers, and think that shot placement is 90% of the battle, but I wouldn't recommend the 204 for anything bigger than a coyote after that experience.


Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3