texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
victorcaoh, gtmill6619, cpen13, Huntinkid, garey
72055 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,797
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,531
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,940
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics538,059
Posts9,732,548
Members87,055
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Sig 229 vs 1911 #2585794 09/15/11 11:06 PM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,434
S
silentex Offline OP
Pro Tracker
OP Offline
Pro Tracker
S
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,434
I have a tendency to change my carry weapon a little too often. So, now I'm at the point where I'd like to change it again. In the past year, I went from an HK P2000SK to an XD40 3". Now, I'm torn between a Sig 229 or a 3" 1911.

Help.



Justin H.

NSC: Firearms & Hunting Supplies
Re: Sig 229 vs 1911 [Re: silentex] #2585804 09/15/11 11:16 PM
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,199
Q
quartierleblanc Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
Q
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,199
You went from an H&K to a XD? That's a huge step down.


Re: Sig 229 vs 1911 [Re: quartierleblanc] #2585828 09/15/11 11:33 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,796
F
fastliberator Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
F
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,796
Sig all the way!



Those of you who do not stand behind our millitary, please stand in front of it!!!
Re: Sig 229 vs 1911 [Re: fastliberator] #2585865 09/15/11 11:59 PM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,360
E
ep2621 Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
E
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,360
Get both!


Re: Sig 229 vs 1911 [Re: ep2621] #2585915 09/16/11 12:30 AM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 11,658
G
GusWayne Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
G
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 11,658
Depends on what 1911 you are wanting. Les Baer, Wilson or Colt, then I say 1911.


Re: Sig 229 vs 1911 [Re: GusWayne] #2586022 09/16/11 01:13 AM
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,199
Q
quartierleblanc Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
Q
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,199
No way. Stock weapon would be the Sig. But here's a guy who ditched a H&K. Makes you wonder where he's really coming from.


Re: Sig 229 vs 1911 [Re: quartierleblanc] #2586151 09/16/11 01:49 AM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 779
K
K.P Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
K
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 779
229 for sure!

popcorn



"Violence does solve problems" ~Chris Kyle
Re: Sig 229 vs 1911 [Re: K.P] #2586645 09/16/11 04:04 AM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,766
T
Tactical_Smurf Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
T
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,766
Wow those are two completely different guns.

Im a Sig Sauer Fan Boy so guess what gets my vote up




Certified Glock Armorer - Because my Sig Sauers Don't Fail.
"We are prepared to give all of our Tomorrows, for a single child's Today" - Kidnap Rescue Operator
Re: Sig 229 vs 1911 [Re: Tactical_Smurf] #2586709 09/16/11 04:55 AM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 44,585
RKHarm24 Offline
sergeant
Offline
sergeant
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 44,585
The way you change, Sig.......

1911 needs to have intimate bonding with it's owner/shooter..

Muscle/Controls Instinct Memory

Controllable for fast recovery & follow-up shots...




Re: Sig 229 vs 1911 [Re: RKHarm24] #2588002 09/16/11 09:25 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,579
Gumbeaux Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,579
It's hard to beat a Sig.



[Linked Image]
Re: Sig 229 vs 1911 [Re: Gumbeaux] #2588056 09/16/11 09:54 PM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 32,601
sig226fan (Rguns.com) Offline
duck & cover
Offline
duck & cover
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 32,601
1911


Re: Sig 229 vs 1911 [Re: sig226fan (Rguns.com)] #2588058 09/16/11 09:55 PM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 32,601
sig226fan (Rguns.com) Offline
duck & cover
Offline
duck & cover
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 32,601
Sorry, couldn't resist.......

SIG's are three generations later by the same designer.... He thought they were better


Re: Sig 229 vs 1911 [Re: quartierleblanc] #2588426 09/17/11 01:29 AM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,434
S
silentex Offline OP
Pro Tracker
OP Offline
Pro Tracker
S
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,434
Originally Posted By: quartierleblanc
You went from an H&K to a XD? That's a huge step down.


I wasn't comfortable with the LEM trigger. I've said it before on these forums, but I'm not a big guy . . . I have the hands of a 12 year old girl and, for whatever reason, the trigger plagued me.

I had inherited my Dad's XD and I decided that I'd make the change . . . Not only because I wanted to carry my Dad's gun, but also due to the fact that I simply did not like the HK's trigger . . . detested it, really. Plus, selling it helped pay for my wedding.



Justin H.

NSC: Firearms & Hunting Supplies
Re: Sig 229 vs 1911 [Re: silentex] #2588722 09/17/11 03:45 AM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,474
D
Driller Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,474
Sig






Re: Sig 229 vs 1911 [Re: Driller] #2589858 09/17/11 11:38 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 895
L
LuckenbachTexas Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
L
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 895
1911's aren't effective modern combat weapons

A 226 doesn't take up that much more space if you want the best choice. I have G-10 Piranha grips on mine.

It sounds like you need to determine goals and find out why you keep changing

Have you looked at the beretta cheetah 380?


Last edited by LuckenbachTexas; 09/17/11 11:49 PM.


"Love it or leave it"
Re: Sig 229 vs 1911 [Re: LuckenbachTexas] #2590243 09/18/11 03:23 AM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 145
C
CoyoteOn2 Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
C
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 145
You could always go with the
SIG 1911, then you'ld have both
in one package.
BTW, they also offer it in 3 sizes,
in overall lengths of
Full size 8.7"
Carry & Compact C3. 7.7"
Ultra Compact. 6.8"

Just an idea ~~~~~~~~~~



Larry
aka CoyoteOn2


But Hey ~~~ What do I know?
Re: Sig 229 vs 1911 [Re: silentex] #2590332 09/18/11 04:17 AM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,853
D
DannyB Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
D
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,853
I would say Sig even though I have never owned one. I have had a bunch of name brand 1911's and a Springfield Loaded was the only one that didn't jam all the time.

With all the reliable polymer lightweight guns out there now I don't know why anyone would want to lug around an all steel gun anymore. And you did say you weren't a very big guy. Neither am I, and if I was actually going to carry a gun it would either be a different H&K than the P2000, such as a USP compact, or a Glock.


Re: Sig 229 vs 1911 [Re: DannyB] #2590565 09/18/11 01:17 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 16,729
K
KC Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
K
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 16,729
Originally Posted By: DannyB
I would say Sig even though I have never owned one. I have had a bunch of name brand 1911's and a Springfield Loaded was the only one that didn't jam all the time.

With all the reliable polymer lightweight guns out there now I don't know why anyone would want to lug around an all steel gun anymore. And you did say you weren't a very big guy. Neither am I, and if I was actually going to carry a gun it would either be a different H&K than the P2000, such as a USP compact, or a Glock.



I usually don't carry for more than an hour or two at a time, and I prefer the feel of an all steel gun. I have an XD Subcompact that the wife and I share, but when clothing allows I tote my CZ Compact.

If you've never handled a Sig 229, put your hands on one before you buy it. They have an.... uh... interesting grip for people with small hands. I want to find a Sig that's comfortable for me, but it feels like gripping a beer can. I have stubby fingers though, so ymmv.


Re: Sig 229 vs 1911 [Re: KC] #2590725 09/18/11 03:03 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 14,199
T
tth_40 Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 14,199
XDm 3.8 is another good one as well.



Originally Posted By: theserxtremedays
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers
Re: Sig 229 vs 1911 [Re: KC] #2590964 09/18/11 05:30 PM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,653
O
Ox190 Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
O
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,653
Originally Posted By: KC
Originally Posted By: DannyB
I would say Sig even though I have never owned one. I have had a bunch of name brand 1911's and a Springfield Loaded was the only one that didn't jam all the time.

With all the reliable polymer lightweight guns out there now I don't know why anyone would want to lug around an all steel gun anymore. And you did say you weren't a very big guy. Neither am I, and if I was actually going to carry a gun it would either be a different H&K than the P2000, such as a USP compact, or a Glock.



I usually don't carry for more than an hour or two at a time, and I prefer the feel of an all steel gun. I have an XD Subcompact that the wife and I share, but when clothing allows I tote my CZ Compact.

If you've never handled a Sig 229, put your hands on one before you buy it. They have an.... uh... interesting grip for people with small hands. I want to find a Sig that's comfortable for me, but it feels like gripping a beer can. I have stubby fingers though, so ymmv.


Have you handled a 239? I have little hands and I love mine.



"There has never been an occasion where a people gave up their weapons in the interest of peace that didn't end in their massacre." Louis L'Amour
Re: Sig 229 vs 1911 [Re: Ox190] #2591066 09/18/11 06:40 PM
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 123
S
sshields Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
S
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 123
If you have small hands look into the p229 E2 the grips are smaller


Re: Sig 229 vs 1911 [Re: LuckenbachTexas] #2591673 09/18/11 11:08 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,906
L
luv2brode Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,906
[quote=LuckenbachTexas]1911's aren't effective modern combat weapons

wow really, i think this is big news, i hadnt heard.



i am cancelling my subscription, i am tired of your issues!
Re: Sig 229 vs 1911 [Re: luv2brode] #2591683 09/18/11 11:11 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,906
L
luv2brode Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,906
sigs are great guns and if you are not willing to put the time in learning and becoming comfortable with it then go with the sig



i am cancelling my subscription, i am tired of your issues!
Re: Sig 229 vs 1911 [Re: luv2brode] #2591702 09/18/11 11:16 PM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,267
T
TRIJI....WHAT Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
T
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,267
SIG P226 What other pistol is there?



Shhhhhhhh better to be quiet than remove all doubt..
Re: Sig 229 vs 1911 [Re: sshields] #2592249 09/19/11 02:04 AM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 16,729
K
KC Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
K
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 16,729
Originally Posted By: sshields
If you have small hands look into the p229 E2 the grips are smaller


I have, and frankly a gun that big should hold more rounds. My CZ is the same basic size (slightly bigger OAL) and holds 14 rds.


Page 1 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3