Forums46
Topics538,785
Posts9,741,218
Members87,113
|
Most Online25,604 Feb 12th, 2024
|
|
|
triple shock 110 gr vs. 165 gr
#2446056
07/22/11 02:31 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 838
pafree
OP
Tracker
|
OP
Tracker
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 838 |
federal has a 110 gr and a 165 gr with the barnes triple shock. i have been using the 165 gr but wonder the difference with the 110 gr. i am using a 30-06 and most targets (hogs and deer) are less than 100 yards. an information would be great. i know if it is not broke then don't fix it but just curious.
|
|
|
Re: triple shock 110 gr vs. 165 gr
[Re: pafree]
#2446287
07/22/11 04:17 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,901
JJH
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,901 |
The lighter bullet would have much higher velocity. Perhaps quicker kills on average, but dead is dead. YOu didn't ask, but IMO for a 308 used for deer, especially at ranges of 100yards or less, you would be just as well served by a conventional bullet of 150 or 165grains, and would have more $$$ in your wallet.
The TSX is a great bullet and can do some things that a conventional cup and core bullet cannot (e.g. withstand very hig velocities and provide exceptional penetration). Neither of these are necessary for deer with a 308. JMO
|
|
|
Re: triple shock 110 gr vs. 165 gr
[Re: JJH]
#2446306
07/22/11 04:27 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,545
kmon11
junior
|
junior
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,545 |
lf the saying "Liar, Liar your pants on fire" were true Mainstream news might be fun to watch
|
|
|
Re: triple shock 110 gr vs. 165 gr
[Re: kmon11]
#2446318
07/22/11 04:38 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 41,322
BMD
Silver Spoon
|
Silver Spoon
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 41,322 |
110gr in 30/06 would be my choice high velocity is a good thing with TSX
|
|
|
Re: triple shock 110 gr vs. 165 gr
[Re: BMD]
#2446355
07/22/11 05:29 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 838
pafree
OP
Tracker
|
OP
Tracker
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 838 |
110gr in 30/06 would be my choice high velocity is a good thing with TSX might sound like a newbie question. if the bullet is traveling faster, can the bullet be traveling too fast for the triple shock tip to open up when it hits at a short shooting range? i would think it would be OK on a big thick skinned boar but what about a softer skinned deer.
|
|
|
Re: triple shock 110 gr vs. 165 gr
[Re: pafree]
#2446718
07/22/11 02:17 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,601
redchevy
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,601 |
From my experience with tsx velocity is your friend. The faster the better.
matt
It's hell eatin em live
|
|
|
Re: triple shock 110 gr vs. 165 gr
[Re: redchevy]
#2446867
07/22/11 03:36 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 557
HICKORY12
Tracker
|
Tracker
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 557 |
The lighter bullet will expand quicker than the heavier one. therefore you will get more damage to the meat with the 110 gr. bullet.
Remember The Alamo. And GOD BLESS ROBERT E. LEE. [IMG]
|
|
|
Re: triple shock 110 gr vs. 165 gr
[Re: HICKORY12]
#2447058
07/22/11 05:08 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 838
pafree
OP
Tracker
|
OP
Tracker
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 838 |
The lighter bullet will expand quicker than the heavier one. therefore you will get more damage to the meat with the 110 gr. bullet. so would you want a heavier grain bullet like 165 gr or 180 gr to reduce meat loss or for bigger game? i also read that the 110 gr has less recoil but we got the recoil under control using the 165 grain with a recoil pad on the gun. not really sold on buying the 110 grain yet but the 165 gr did make a large DRT wounds on two 100 lb pigs that we have shot in the last couple of weeks. maybe i should be looking at the 180 grain for less meat loss but don't want to get back into the recoil issue. right now, pigs are plentiful so i might try the 110 gr.
|
|
|
Re: triple shock 110 gr vs. 165 gr
[Re: pafree]
#2447082
07/22/11 05:24 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 41,322
BMD
Silver Spoon
|
Silver Spoon
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 41,322 |
Don't want to run heavy TSX at low velocity, it will likely punch a hole and never expand. Velocity is your friend with TSX as noted above.
|
|
|
Re: triple shock 110 gr vs. 165 gr
[Re: pafree]
#2447126
07/22/11 05:49 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 32,068
txtrophy85
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 32,068 |
[quote=HICKORY12] . maybe i should be looking at the 180 grain for less meat loss but don't want to get back into the recoil issue. right now, pigs are plentiful so i might try the 110 gr. I'm not a fan of heavy for caliber bullets, from what I've seen, they don't expand enough on deer sized game and they don't seem have as many DRT kills than using a lighter bullet. If your worried about meat loss, shoot whatever your trying to kill in the head or neck
For it is not the quarry that we truly seek, but the adventure.
|
|
|
Re: triple shock 110 gr vs. 165 gr
[Re: txtrophy85]
#2447150
07/22/11 06:03 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,601
redchevy
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,601 |
alot depends on the construction of the bullet, I shot several hogs with 220 grain round nose soft point hornady interlocks out of my 300 wby and they all blew up and didnt exit, there were some nasty nasty wounds and extreem internal damage and they were all DRT.
The tsx's should not over expand, that is what they are made for is hi velocity.
Last edited by redchevy; 07/22/11 07:19 PM.
It's hell eatin em live
|
|
|
Re: triple shock 110 gr vs. 165 gr
[Re: pafree]
#2447170
07/22/11 06:14 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,639
BOBO the Clown
kind of a big deal
|
kind of a big deal
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,639 |
can you go to slow yes...to fast no. My 257 wby kicks 80 gr ttsx at over 3850fts and the performance is second to none....if you shot big and slow bullets shoot cup and core...shoot fast and very very fast shot barnes....barnes excells in the 22-250 and 220 swift b/c of the velocity 110gr in 30/06 would be my choice high velocity is a good thing with TSX might sound like a newbie question. if the bullet is traveling faster, can the bullet be traveling too fast for the triple shock tip to open up when it hits at a short shooting range? i would think it would be OK on a big thick skinned boar but what about a softer skinned deer.
|
|
|
Re: triple shock 110 gr vs. 165 gr
[Re: BOBO the Clown]
#2447965
07/23/11 01:41 AM
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,444
beaucfus
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,444 |
Don't know about the factory loads, but we hand load the 130gr .for my 270. Had no problems
|
|
|
Re: triple shock 110 gr vs. 165 gr
[Re: beaucfus]
#2448759
07/23/11 03:57 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,273
boonee
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,273 |
I have taken hogs with my Elk load 300 Wby. 180 tsx, to core locks in .223 to 30-06, bullet placement is MORE important than the bullet, hunting out to 150yds.My best Llano deer load was my old 700,30-06 125gr SPs. They would group under 3/4 inch, no recoil!
Avenger Firearms 214-577-5818 avengerfirearms@gmail.com
Lifetime NRA member
|
|
|
Re: triple shock 110 gr vs. 165 gr
[Re: boonee]
#2449004
07/23/11 06:19 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 44,585
RKHarm24
sergeant
|
sergeant
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 44,585 |
Rem Managed Recoil 30-06 125gr bullet...
|
|
|
Re: triple shock 110 gr vs. 165 gr
[Re: RKHarm24]
#2449697
07/24/11 02:13 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 838
pafree
OP
Tracker
|
OP
Tracker
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 838 |
thanks for the great information. i was just curious and figured i would ask. what factors (animal hunting, how far of a shot, weather conditions, bush and trees, etc...) would make someone go to the store and buy a certain size grain bullet. examples: the federal barnes triple shock comes in 110, 165 and 180 grain. this is part i don't understand. is it a ford vs. chevy thing?
|
|
|
Re: triple shock 110 gr vs. 165 gr
[Re: pafree]
#2449964
07/24/11 04:34 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 44,585
RKHarm24
sergeant
|
sergeant
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 44,585 |
The heavier the bullet, the more energy retained further down range.
|
|
|
Re: triple shock 110 gr vs. 165 gr
[Re: RKHarm24]
#2451814
07/25/11 03:31 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,639
BOBO the Clown
kind of a big deal
|
kind of a big deal
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,639 |
The heavier the bullet, the more energy retained further down range. Velocity is squared in the energy equation. Coefficient of the bullet plays a big part to. Every caliber has a sweet spot where you get the most of the out of weight and velocity. To heavy loss speed to quick, to light coefficient stinks. to me it's about finding the right bullet that takes advantage of energy and speed at certain yardage. Under 450yards barnes over 450 berger or high bc cup and core. To much energy cup/core separate...to little energy barnes doesn't open
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, hetman, jeh7mmmag, JustWingem, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, rifleman, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, TreeBass, txcornhusker
|