Forums46
Topics539,307
Posts9,748,120
Members87,154
|
Most Online25,604 Feb 12th, 2024
|
|
|
Re: Glock 32 and overall .357 sig opinions vs. 9mm/.40
[Re: Victor Six Bravo]
#936237
09/30/09 10:20 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,401
scot
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,401 |
Forget that .357 sig nonsense. Go for the full 10mm auto. I believe the sig only got up into the 600ft lb range in the few loads available. Where you can get to 800 ft lbs with the 10mm which is right where .357 mag typically can get safely. So you can start bear hunting with your glock instead of worrying about people protection.
The frame is a bit larger but they now have the slim frame model so you could find one that fits you.
|
|
|
Re: Glock 32 and overall .357 sig opinions vs. 9mm/.40
[Re: Victor Six Bravo]
#936265
09/30/09 10:41 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 935
Sabrinavonbach
Tracker
|
Tracker
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 935 |
Yep, the 9mm 147+P and +P+ will do just about the same thing as the 357 Sig. They're hard to get rounds commercially, however. I agree with you about the 9mm. There's not a lot of difference in overall stopping power between the 9mm and other rounds, only a few percentage points.
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, hetman, jeh7mmmag, JustWingem, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, rifleman, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, TreeBass, txcornhusker
|