Forums46
Topics538,715
Posts9,740,331
Members87,103
|
Most Online25,604 Feb 12th, 2024
|
|
|
300 H&H
#9039939
04/29/24 12:07 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,249
QMC SW/EXW
OP
Pro Tracker
|
OP
Pro Tracker
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,249 |
I am getting ready to start playing with a 300 H&H and I have about 130 of the 165 Gr GMX on hand. I know they discontinued them in favor of the CX but like I said I have them on hand and figure they would be a good deer/pronghorn bullet. Loading data for the GMX is a little hard to get since they discontinued them so I'm seeing if anyone has a pet load or even a starting load? I have nearly 4 lbs of IMR 4831 on hand so would like to use that powder but I also have 4350, RL-22 and several others that I use in my 7mm Mag and 375 H&H Mag. I have been told that you can use CX load data but don't know if that is valid. Any info anybody can provide would be appreciated.
I am also curious if the Barnes data would be comparable enough to use as a starting point?
Retired Navy Chief NJROTC Instructor for Tascosa High School
|
|
|
Re: 300 H&H
[Re: QMC SW/EXW]
#9039948
04/29/24 12:37 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,321
Deans
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,321 |
That is what I would do. Just start low and you should be ok. Also look at Nosler they show a few different powders that you may have.
“Fear thou not; for I am with thee: be not dismayed; for I am thy God: I will strengthen thee; yea, I will help thee; yea, I will uphold thee with the right hand of my righteousness.” ISAIAH 41:10
|
|
|
Re: 300 H&H
[Re: QMC SW/EXW]
#9041001
05/01/24 04:08 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,599
redchevy
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,599 |
I loaded the 165’s in my 300 wby. Shot good. If you hit bone they do great if you don’t hit bone I never got much expansion. I used Barnes data for a starting point if I remember correctly.
It's hell eatin em live
|
|
|
Re: 300 H&H
[Re: QMC SW/EXW]
#9041077
05/01/24 01:05 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,539
kmon11
junior
|
junior
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,539 |
Nosler though a different bullet is geared toward the bullet of that gr weight with the toughest construction so good point for data. Barnes can be another good source if the bullet maker makes one similar. Compare data from several sources and start with the lower or average is what I have done in the past.
Deer and pronghorns do not really call for that tough a bullet IMO unless running very fast but when you have them go for it if you want
lf the saying "Liar, Liar your pants on fire" were true Mainstream news might be fun to watch
|
|
|
Re: 300 H&H
[Re: QMC SW/EXW]
#9041104
05/01/24 01:43 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 26
mdwest
Light Foot
|
Light Foot
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 26 |
I am also curious if the Barnes data would be comparable enough to use as a starting point?
I load for 2x 300 H&H's (a Rem 721 and an Enfield P14 custom build). I have gotten excellent performance shooting 168gr Barnes TTSX and 180gr Barnes TTSX. The CX and TTSX are pretty comparable, and even going to the max barnes manual loadings I havent seen any pressure signs or had any performance problems at all.. I think youd be safe using the barnes data as a starting point..
|
|
|
Re: 300 H&H
[Re: mdwest]
#9041191
05/01/24 04:13 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,539
kmon11
junior
|
junior
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,539 |
I am also curious if the Barnes data would be comparable enough to use as a starting point?
I load for 2x 300 H&H's (a Rem 721 and an Enfield P14 custom build). I have gotten excellent performance shooting 168gr Barnes TTSX and 180gr Barnes TTSX. The CX and TTSX are pretty comparable, and even going to the max barnes manual loadings I havent seen any pressure signs or had any performance problems at all.. I think youd be safe using the barnes data as a starting point.. Do the Hornady bullets have the pressure relief grooves like the Barnes bullets do? that can make a difference. I think Hornady and Nosler use a gilding metal bullet as opposed to just copper as well. Just thought about that. The old Barnes bullets before the TSX bullets load data for was lower. I remember loading the old Barnes bullets hack when and they reached pressure at lower charges than cup &core bullets or Partitions.
lf the saying "Liar, Liar your pants on fire" were true Mainstream news might be fun to watch
|
|
|
Re: 300 H&H
[Re: QMC SW/EXW]
#9041352
05/01/24 09:31 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,599
redchevy
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,599 |
If I remember right the gm had 2 pressure groves.
It's hell eatin em live
|
|
|
Re: 300 H&H
[Re: redchevy]
#9041361
05/01/24 09:48 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,622
BOBO the Clown
kind of a big deal
|
kind of a big deal
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,622 |
If I remember right the gm had 2 pressure groves. CX does too, and both have two to be exact. I looked because i was curious if it was same as barnes
|
|
|
Re: 300 H&H
[Re: QMC SW/EXW]
#9041398
05/01/24 11:11 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 373
eyedoc
Bird Dog
|
Bird Dog
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 373 |
I hunt alot w a .300 H&H, have hunted w 150, 180, and 200 gr Barnes TSX. My best loads for each: 150 RL -15 61.0 gr 180 RL-19 69.0 200 IMR 4350 62.0
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, hetman, jeh7mmmag, JustWingem, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, rifleman, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, TreeBass, txcornhusker
|