JG2.0 is a tikka action man!!!! and He just doesnt like curves he likes them with 20 degree angle flat assess

if my fierce didnt shoot as well as it did, I sell it and build a 22” rifle, But ya the dual ejector is special

Hard to forget the all time dumbest post you’ve ever made.

My mom could beat up your mom

When I don't have a judge with me on the land, my carry is a Colt 1911. Comparing pistols to centerfire rifle power is apples and oranges. I can't carry a 243 on my hip....nor would I want to, to be honest.

I didn't say that they were not good. I was saying that they are overrated. I have carried them and love them but I am aware of their limitations.

OK, I'll bite

In general...

Bullpups
Anything 300 Blackout for supersonic use
6.5 Creedmoor for hunting
Piston operated ARs
Anything .357 Sig or .40 S&W

In particular...

Taurus Judge

1911. Great gun but a 45acp isn't Mjölnir and at the end of the day it is still weaker than almost every centerfire rifle cartridge.

Hand loads or factory?

OK, I'll bite

Piston operated ARs

Well, I have to ask, what don't you like about the Judge? Surprised to see so many mentions of taurus on a "most overrated" thread. To be overrated, you have to be generally very highly rated and I'm not sure Taurus fits that bill in the true gun enthusiast community.

I'll say it again - IMHO, Judge is absolutely the best tractor or side by side gun out there for disposing of snakes, rats, and other critters in a compact but powerful package that can fit in a glove box or tool box. It can run both 410 and 45LC if you have a need for more than shells. It has a nice trigger and holds up well to a little bit of weather. And Taurus has been making excellent revolvers for 30+ years. My model 85 is a late 80s gun that has never missed a beat through many thousands of rounds. Definitely surprising.

I also don't see anyone rating 300BO highly for supersonic use. Don't see how 6.5cm is overrated for hunting as it's probably disposing of more animals in texas per year than any other caliber if I had to guess. But to each their own on that one.

I do agree with 40S&W. My nightstand gun is one and if I had to do it over again, I'd have just gone 9mm. Nothing wrong with 40, but it's like the recoil of a 45 with the stopping power of a 9. Kind of turned into a worst of both worlds round IMHO.

Put down the pipe or the keyboard.

Just curious, why? Would it be all piston operated ARs because there is something inherently flawed in the design OR they just over rated to you?
Note I don't own but have heard how wonderful they can be. So the rhetoric goes that it's an AR with AK reliability. I've always been a bit dubious of the claim, but again no actual evidence.

My Judge (OK I was dumb enough to buy one) won't shoot a good enough pattern to kill a snake past 5yds, at that distance I can just shoot the head off the snake with my carry gun. I carry a 18" H&R single shot 20ga in the mule just for snakes and it will really mess one up at a very safe 50ft

I've been fortunate to hunt with a lot of guides, outfitters and professional hunters and when the subject of guns and calibers comes up (it always does) the tell me the same thing. That they cringe when a hunter shows up with a 6.5CM because they know they will be looking for wounded game. Also my friends that bought into the 6.5 craze tell me they lost game with the 6.5 that they know would have been recovered if it had been shot with a .308. Don't get me wrong, I like the 6.5CM for a range gun and IF the proper bullets (Nosler Partition as an example) were selected for hunting there is no reason it shouldn't kill well. But it seems most hunters pick their 6.5 bullets based on BC even thought they shoot deer at under 200yds.

My Judge (OK I was dumb enough to buy one) won't shoot a good enough pattern to kill a snake past 5yds, at that distance I can just shoot the head off the snake with my carry gun. I carry a 18" H&R single shot 20ga in the mule just for snakes and it will really mess one up at a very safe 50ft

I've been fortunate to hunt with a lot of guides, outfitters and professional hunters and when the subject of guns and calibers comes up (it always does) the tell me the same thing. That they cringe when a hunter shows up with a 6.5CM because they know they will be looking for wounded game. Also my friends that bought into the 6.5 craze tell me they lost game with the 6.5 that they know would have been recovered if it had been shot with a .308. Don't get me wrong, I like the 6.5CM for a range gun and IF the proper bullets (Nosler Partition as an example) were selected for hunting there is no reason it shouldn't kill well. But it seems most hunters pick their 6.5 bullets based on BC even thought they shoot deer at under 200yds.

I like the 6.5CM for a range gun and IF the proper bullets (Nosler Partition as an example) were selected for hunting there is no reason it shouldn't kill well. But it seems most hunters pick their 6.5 bullets based on BC even thought they shoot deer at under 200yds.