texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Buff65, TrophyHtr316, Pete's, DeVoBrown, JBRYANT 82
72089 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,802
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,539
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 44,018
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics538,441
Posts9,737,083
Members87,089
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: 25-06 or 257 Weatherby... other options [Re: RJH1] #9010811 02/24/24 11:54 PM
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 3,847
1
10 Gauge Online Content
Extreme Tracker
Online Content
Extreme Tracker
1
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 3,847
I plugged in the numbers from Nosler’s 110 grain 30-06 load data and got 1.1” high at 100 when zeroed for 200, and 5.8” low at 300.

So the question becomes, what happens to a 110 grain 30 cal bullet moving 3,400 fps? Something in my gut tells me you better keep it off the shoulder 😂

If you keep this up you are gonna make me buy a .270. I think the real problem with the load data is almost everything is tested in a 24” barrel, and the .25-06 likes a 26” barrel. .270 is much better in a handy 22” gun. I went through this process some years ago and I almost bought a .270. Started off looking at the 6.5-300 and got on THF, one thing led to another lol. Then life probably happened and my fun money went out to pay for life, or something. I don’t recall exactly.

Today? I would probably do a 26” or 28” .25-06 and roll my own if I went through that process. There are people out there pushing it and getting suprising results.

But I went through my own process again recently and settled on 16” .358 winchester. Opposite opposite opposite.

Last edited by Bryan C. Heimann; 02/24/24 11:58 PM.

1 Thessalonians 4:11-14
Re: 25-06 or 257 Weatherby... other options [Re: 10 Gauge] #9010821 02/25/24 12:21 AM
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,353
R
RJH1 Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
R
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,353
Originally Posted by Bryan C. Heimann
I plugged in the numbers from Nosler’s 110 grain 30-06 load data and got 1.1” high at 100 when zeroed for 200, and 5.8” low at 300.

So the question becomes, what happens to a 110 grain 30 cal bullet moving 3,400 fps? Something in my gut tells me you better keep it off the shoulder 😂

If you keep this up you are gonna make me buy a .270. I think the real problem with the load data is almost everything is tested in a 24” barrel, and the .25-06 likes a 26” barrel. .270 is much better in a handy 22” gun. I went through this process some years ago and I almost bought a .270. Started off looking at the 6.5-300 and got on THF, one thing led to another lol. Then life probably happened and my fun money went out to pay for life, or something. I don’t recall exactly.

Today? I would probably do a 26” or 28” .25-06 and roll my own if I went through that process. There are people out there pushing it and getting suprising results.

But I went through my own process again recently and settled on 16” .358 winchester. Opposite opposite opposite.



One guy I know it says the 30 ought 6 moving at that speed drops them like lightning, but I have not used it myself.

I'm a firm believer f it ain't a 30-06 it really doesn't matter anyway roflmao

Re: 25-06 or 257 Weatherby... other options [Re: BOBO the Clown] #9010822 02/25/24 12:36 AM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,311
B
bobcat1 Online Content OP
THF Trophy Hunter
OP Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
B
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,311
Originally Posted by BOBO the Clown
Originally Posted by bobcat1
Thanks for the info Bobo!


Any time, congrats and welcome to the .25 bore club!!

cheers


Bobby Barnett

Re: 25-06 or 257 Weatherby... other options [Re: RJH1] #9010823 02/25/24 12:36 AM
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 3,847
1
10 Gauge Online Content
Extreme Tracker
Online Content
Extreme Tracker
1
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 3,847
Originally Posted by RJH1
Originally Posted by Bryan C. Heimann
I plugged in the numbers from Nosler’s 110 grain 30-06 load data and got 1.1” high at 100 when zeroed for 200, and 5.8” low at 300.

So the question becomes, what happens to a 110 grain 30 cal bullet moving 3,400 fps? Something in my gut tells me you better keep it off the shoulder 😂

If you keep this up you are gonna make me buy a .270. I think the real problem with the load data is almost everything is tested in a 24” barrel, and the .25-06 likes a 26” barrel. .270 is much better in a handy 22” gun. I went through this process some years ago and I almost bought a .270. Started off looking at the 6.5-300 and got on THF, one thing led to another lol. Then life probably happened and my fun money went out to pay for life, or something. I don’t recall exactly.

Today? I would probably do a 26” or 28” .25-06 and roll my own if I went through that process. There are people out there pushing it and getting suprising results.

But I went through my own process again recently and settled on 16” .358 winchester. Opposite opposite opposite.



One guy I know it says the 30 ought 6 moving at that speed drops them like lightning, but I have not used it myself.

I'm a firm believer f it ain't a 30-06 it really doesn't matter anyway roflmao


I think a .25-06 is a heck of a round and nothing else with less than 12 foot-pounds of recoil comes close inside 300 yards. But right now I am at .308 winchester because it’s good enough for anything and always available. One thing i learned in the last 5 years living in an ammo desert is that I need a .308. Also building the .358 winchester whenever the project rifle finally arrives.

And sure, you can find data on flatter shooting loads for this and that and the other but if you re gonna walk in to the store and choose from what is available, well if trajectory and recoil matters to you .25-06 is a real good pick.

I have never seen a 110 grain 30-06 load on the shelf.

I am pretty sure there are people loading an 87 grain 25-06 to 3800-3900 fps with a 26 or 28 inch barrel. Pretty sure that would do nicely with a barnes x or something. Or it might have been 25-06 AI, who knows. Never claimed to be an expert, i read the same stuff you do.

Last edited by Bryan C. Heimann; 02/25/24 12:38 AM.

1 Thessalonians 4:11-14
Re: 25-06 or 257 Weatherby... other options [Re: 10 Gauge] #9010893 02/25/24 04:43 AM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,056
HWY_MAN Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,056
Weatherby 257 Factory 87's show 3850. Best I've seen for the 25-06 is around 3500 and that's no slouch. For me 3500 fps is the Magic number, any thing beyond that is just gravy.


Yes! A Weatherby does kill them deader.
Re: 25-06 or 257 Weatherby... other options [Re: 10 Gauge] #9010898 02/25/24 04:54 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,580
BOBO the Clown Online Content
kind of a big deal
Online Content
kind of a big deal
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,580
Originally Posted by Bryan C. Heimann
Originally Posted by RJH1
Originally Posted by Bryan C. Heimann
I plugged in the numbers from Nosler’s 110 grain 30-06 load data and got 1.1” high at 100 when zeroed for 200, and 5.8” low at 300.

So the question becomes, what happens to a 110 grain 30 cal bullet moving 3,400 fps? Something in my gut tells me you better keep it off the shoulder 😂

If you keep this up you are gonna make me buy a .270. I think the real problem with the load data is almost everything is tested in a 24” barrel, and the .25-06 likes a 26” barrel. .270 is much better in a handy 22” gun. I went through this process some years ago and I almost bought a .270. Started off looking at the 6.5-300 and got on THF, one thing led to another lol. Then life probably happened and my fun money went out to pay for life, or something. I don’t recall exactly.

Today? I would probably do a 26” or 28” .25-06 and roll my own if I went through that process. There are people out there pushing it and getting suprising results.

But I went through my own process again recently and settled on 16” .358 winchester. Opposite opposite opposite.



One guy I know it says the 30 ought 6 moving at that speed drops them like lightning, but I have not used it myself.

I'm a firm believer f it ain't a 30-06 it really doesn't matter anyway roflmao


I think a .25-06 is a heck of a round and nothing else with less than 12 foot-pounds of recoil comes close inside 300 yards. But right now I am at .308 winchester because it’s good enough for anything and always available. One thing i learned in the last 5 years living in an ammo desert is that I need a .308. Also building the .358 winchester whenever the project rifle finally arrives.

And sure, you can find data on flatter shooting loads for this and that and the other but if you re gonna walk in to the store and choose from what is available, well if trajectory and recoil matters to you .25-06 is a real good pick.

I have never seen a 110 grain 30-06 load on the shelf.

I am pretty sure there are people loading an 87 grain 25-06 to 3800-3900 fps with a 26 or 28 inch barrel. Pretty sure that would do nicely with a barnes x or something. Or it might have been 25-06 AI, who knows. Never claimed to be an expert, i read the same stuff you do.



257 wby 26” barrel and 80 gr TTSX was 3880 with accuracy node at 3810. If you take 25-06 w/87 gr as high or higher, I think you are pushing into compressed loads



Donate to TX Youth hunting program.... better to donate then to waste it in taxes

https://secure.qgiv.com/for/gtgoh/mobile
Re: 25-06 or 257 Weatherby... other options [Re: bobcat1] #9010907 02/25/24 08:34 AM
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 3,847
1
10 Gauge Online Content
Extreme Tracker
Online Content
Extreme Tracker
1
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 3,847
hammer up

‘Preciate ya’ll

bolt


1 Thessalonians 4:11-14
Re: 25-06 or 257 Weatherby... other options [Re: bobcat1] #9011534 02/26/24 04:00 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,175
T
texaspatriot.308 Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
T
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,175
.25-06 is much more affordable to shoot even if you reload.


TexasPatriot.308
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3