texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
dtorgie, bluebiller, Time2GoHuntin, RobbiTX86, Droptine3030
72075 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,799
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,534
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,982
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics538,237
Posts9,734,667
Members87,075
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Baldwin indicted. [Re: Jimbo1] #8990885 01/20/24 04:00 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 26,301
C
Concho Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
C
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 26,301
Originally Posted by Jimbo1
This is all a show for the libs to say “no one is above the law.” He’ll get probation and a little community service which he’ll do at some queer outreach.



The trial will take place with a liberal jury, he will be found "Not Guilty." Only conservatives and Trump supporters get found guilty in this country now days.



Re: Baldwin indicted. [Re: rolyat.nosaj] #8990892 01/20/24 04:14 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 26,301
C
Concho Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
C
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 26,301
Originally Posted by rolyat.nosaj
Since he played Trump on SNL I'm surprised they didn't indict Trump for it.


Please don't give the left-wingers any ideas, I'm sure there is a DA out there somewhere willing to give it a try...



Re: Baldwin indicted. [Re: Sneaky] #8990898 01/20/24 04:18 PM
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 5,935
J
Jgraider Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
J
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 5,935
That loser should have moved to Canada like he promised.

Re: Baldwin indicted. [Re: Jgraider] #8990928 01/20/24 05:51 PM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 9,736
M
Mickey Moose Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
M
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 9,736
Originally Posted by Jgraider
That loser should have moved to Canada like he promised.

I'll move to Canada... did not move. I didn't pull the trigger... pulled the trigger. [censored] liar.


My botnet is bigger than yours.
Re: Baldwin indicted. [Re: topwater13] #8990964 01/20/24 07:11 PM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,277
N
ntxtrapper Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
N
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,277
Originally Posted by topwater13
Originally Posted by Sneaky
Originally Posted by SherpaPhil
I don't get this. It was either a terrible accident, or not his fault (assuming you believe he has no reason to think it was live ammo). By this logic, every actor who ever held a gun on set should be charged with brandishing.


I don’t understand your comment, at all.


I am not a fan of Baldwin nor Hollywood, but I think his point is this; the actor simply used a prop in the way the scene was dictated. It would be no different than an actor picking up a hammer to drive a nail.
Real weapons are used in movies and the triggers are pulled all the time. Is it the actors fault for doing what he has always done for over 30 years? There were people on the set paid to ensure the safety of those there. To me, that is where the fault lies.

This also relates to my Brandon Lee comment above....the guy that shot him was never charged....and even acted in other films afterwards.


He's one of the producers so he's responsible for safety meetings failing to take place and ignored complaints about safety concerns as well as overall safety on the set. I supervised very real firearms being aimed and discharged with Simunition at other employees during training. I had a safety officer who was tasked with the loading and firearm inspections, but I was still personally present and actively involved in every single process with every firearm. No way in hell a firearm with live ammunition was going to be in my training. That's what a knowledge, responsible supervisor does. He didn't do what ultimately was his responsibility so he's getting what's coming.

Re: Baldwin indicted. [Re: ntxtrapper] #8990970 01/20/24 07:34 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 33,406
bigbob_ftw Offline
Big Sprocket Bob
Offline
Big Sprocket Bob
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 33,406
Originally Posted by ntxtrapper
Originally Posted by topwater13
Originally Posted by Sneaky
Originally Posted by SherpaPhil
I don't get this. It was either a terrible accident, or not his fault (assuming you believe he has no reason to think it was live ammo). By this logic, every actor who ever held a gun on set should be charged with brandishing.


I don’t understand your comment, at all.


I am not a fan of Baldwin nor Hollywood, but I think his point is this; the actor simply used a prop in the way the scene was dictated. It would be no different than an actor picking up a hammer to drive a nail.
Real weapons are used in movies and the triggers are pulled all the time. Is it the actors fault for doing what he has always done for over 30 years? There were people on the set paid to ensure the safety of those there. To me, that is where the fault lies.

This also relates to my Brandon Lee comment above....the guy that shot him was never charged....and even acted in other films afterwards.


He's one of the producers so he's responsible for safety meetings failing to take place and ignored complaints about safety concerns as well as overall safety on the set. I supervised very real firearms being aimed and discharged with Simunition at other employees during training. I had a safety officer who was tasked with the loading and firearm inspections, but I was still personally present and actively involved in every single process with every firearm. No way in hell a firearm with live ammunition was going to be in my training. That's what a knowledge, responsible supervisor does. He didn't do what ultimately was his responsibility so he's getting what's coming.


Fully agree.


[Linked Image]

Ultra MAGA '24.
Re: Baldwin indicted. [Re: bigbob_ftw] #8990981 01/20/24 08:03 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 994
P
presley Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
P
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 994
Originally Posted by bigbob_ftw
Originally Posted by SherpaPhil
I don't get this. It was either a terrible accident, or not his fault (assuming you believe he has no reason to think it was live ammo). By this logic, every actor who ever held a gun on set should be charged with brandishing.


Rule number one, assume every gun is loaded. Rule two, don't point it at anything you don't intend to kill.

What I was taught and what I taught my son and my wife. I don’t believe in accidents when it comes to handling a firearm.

Re: Baldwin indicted. [Re: presley] #8990989 01/20/24 08:35 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 33,406
bigbob_ftw Offline
Big Sprocket Bob
Offline
Big Sprocket Bob
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 33,406
Originally Posted by presley
Originally Posted by bigbob_ftw
Originally Posted by SherpaPhil
I don't get this. It was either a terrible accident, or not his fault (assuming you believe he has no reason to think it was live ammo). By this logic, every actor who ever held a gun on set should be charged with brandishing.


Rule number one, assume every gun is loaded. Rule two, don't point it at anything you don't intend to kill.

What I was taught and what I taught my son and my wife. I don’t believe in accidents when it comes to handling a firearm.


My father taught it to me. Good on you. up


[Linked Image]

Ultra MAGA '24.
Re: Baldwin indicted. [Re: ntxtrapper] #8991127 01/21/24 12:22 AM
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,892
topwater13 Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,892
Originally Posted by ntxtrapper
Originally Posted by topwater13
Originally Posted by Sneaky
Originally Posted by SherpaPhil
I don't get this. It was either a terrible accident, or not his fault (assuming you believe he has no reason to think it was live ammo). By this logic, every actor who ever held a gun on set should be charged with brandishing.


I don’t understand your comment, at all.


I am not a fan of Baldwin nor Hollywood, but I think his point is this; the actor simply used a prop in the way the scene was dictated. It would be no different than an actor picking up a hammer to drive a nail.
Real weapons are used in movies and the triggers are pulled all the time. Is it the actors fault for doing what he has always done for over 30 years? There were people on the set paid to ensure the safety of those there. To me, that is where the fault lies.

This also relates to my Brandon Lee comment above....the guy that shot him was never charged....and even acted in other films afterwards.


He's one of the producers so he's responsible for safety meetings failing to take place and ignored complaints about safety concerns as well as overall safety on the set. I supervised very real firearms being aimed and discharged with Simunition at other employees during training. I had a safety officer who was tasked with the loading and firearm inspections, but I was still personally present and actively involved in every single process with every firearm. No way in hell a firearm with live ammunition was going to be in my training. That's what a knowledge, responsible supervisor does. He didn't do what ultimately was his responsibility so he's getting what's coming.

So is that the angle for the charge? He being the producer and not an actor doing what actors do?
Again, I’m just trying to understand the comparison between the two deaths.

Re: Baldwin indicted. [Re: ntxtrapper] #8991217 01/21/24 02:31 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,221
Grizz Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,221
Originally Posted by ntxtrapper
Originally Posted by topwater13
Originally Posted by Sneaky
Originally Posted by SherpaPhil
I don't get this. It was either a terrible accident, or not his fault (assuming you believe he has no reason to think it was live ammo). By this logic, every actor who ever held a gun on set should be charged with brandishing.


I don’t understand your comment, at all.


I am not a fan of Baldwin nor Hollywood, but I think his point is this; the actor simply used a prop in the way the scene was dictated. It would be no different than an actor picking up a hammer to drive a nail.
Real weapons are used in movies and the triggers are pulled all the time. Is it the actors fault for doing what he has always done for over 30 years? There were people on the set paid to ensure the safety of those there. To me, that is where the fault lies.

This also relates to my Brandon Lee comment above....the guy that shot him was never charged....and even acted in other films afterwards.


He's one of the producers so he's responsible for safety meetings failing to take place and ignored complaints about safety concerns as well as overall safety on the set. I supervised very real firearms being aimed and discharged with Simunition at other employees during training. I had a safety officer who was tasked with the loading and firearm inspections, but I was still personally present and actively involved in every single process with every firearm. No way in hell a firearm with live ammunition was going to be in my training. That's what a knowledge, responsible supervisor does. He didn't do what ultimately was his responsibility so he's getting what's coming.


When we do any type of Sim gun training, we have a very strict process for just this reason. Before going into the scenario area, everyone is patted down to make sure they don't have any live ammo or any type of weapon by two safety officers, only the safety officers can load the magazines, and if we leave the scenario area we are checked again before we can go back in. Rank doesn't exist in the process, no exceptions. Apparently Hollywood doesn't take it that seriously.


[Linked Image] [Linked Image]
Re: Baldwin indicted. [Re: Sneaky] #8991241 01/21/24 03:01 AM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,687
S
SherpaPhil Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
S
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,687
If someone got shot in the sim trainings you guys are describing above, would it be the fault of the officer who pulled the trigger, the officer who loaded the weapon, or the senior officer who organized the training?

Re: Baldwin indicted. [Re: presley] #8991242 01/21/24 03:02 AM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,687
S
SherpaPhil Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
S
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,687
Originally Posted by presley
Originally Posted by bigbob_ftw
Originally Posted by SherpaPhil
I don't get this. It was either a terrible accident, or not his fault (assuming you believe he has no reason to think it was live ammo). By this logic, every actor who ever held a gun on set should be charged with brandishing.


Rule number one, assume every gun is loaded. Rule two, don't point it at anything you don't intend to kill.

What I was taught and what I taught my son and my wife. I don’t believe in accidents when it comes to handling a firearm.


So Hollywood shouldn't make movies where people shoot guns at each other?

Re: Baldwin indicted. [Re: SherpaPhil] #8991247 01/21/24 03:10 AM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,277
N
ntxtrapper Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
N
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,277
Originally Posted by SherpaPhil
Originally Posted by presley
Originally Posted by bigbob_ftw
Originally Posted by SherpaPhil
I don't get this. It was either a terrible accident, or not his fault (assuming you believe he has no reason to think it was live ammo). By this logic, every actor who ever held a gun on set should be charged with brandishing.


Rule number one, assume every gun is loaded. Rule two, don't point it at anything you don't intend to kill.

What I was taught and what I taught my son and my wife. I don’t believe in accidents when it comes to handling a firearm.


So Hollywood shouldn't make movies where people shoot guns at each other?


There are other alternatives to real firearms that can’t shoot live ammunition. Google it.

Page 2 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3