texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
MOElkman, weldbear, dtorgie, bluebiller, Time2GoHuntin
72077 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,799
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,534
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,983
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics538,240
Posts9,734,701
Members87,077
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Naval Gunnery Question #8752755 12/08/22 02:37 AM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 8,152
Homer Jay Offline OP
THF Trophy Hunter
OP Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 8,152
Just finished watching Flags of our Fathers again. Hadn't seen it since it came out.

In one scene the US Navy is beginning its bombardment of Iwo Jima. I recall thinking the first time I saw it, and again tonight, the ships seemed awfully close to the island.

I know its a movie and the visuals are for dramatic effect and perspective.

But I was wondering, at what distance would the battle wagons like Texas and Arkansas have stood off when firing on the island?


"Like a slice of fried gold!"
Re: Naval Gunnery Question [Re: Homer Jay] #8752763 12/08/22 02:45 AM
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 23,188
Bee'z Offline
The Beedazzler
Offline
The Beedazzler
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 23,188
The big guns were around 13 miles per wiki. That sounds about right honestly


[Linked Image]
Re: Naval Gunnery Question [Re: Homer Jay] #8752783 12/08/22 03:43 AM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 19,825
TurkeyHunter Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 19,825
That’s a really good question. Closest will be the destroyers. They can operate in shallower water and generally could provide a much higher rate of more accurate fire. Generally 5” guns with those. Next would be cruisers operating in a little deeper water with 5” and 8” guns. Good rate of fire and very effective.

Battleship needed/wanted plenty of deep water and room for movement but could operate closer than you might think with their 14” and 16” guns using fewer powder chargers. I believe their max range was using 3 or more powder charges. But they could load fewer propellant charges and be accurate with exploding rounds using less charges. Increase gun elevation, use fewer charges, you could hit relatively close for a big battle wagon.

My details could be a little off because they are from memory but the general idea is correct.

I believe 8” guns on cruisers could also adjust powder charges.


To be determined
Re: Naval Gunnery Question [Re: Homer Jay] #8752793 12/08/22 03:54 AM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 19,825
TurkeyHunter Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 19,825
[Linked Image]


To be determined
Re: Naval Gunnery Question [Re: Homer Jay] #8752796 12/08/22 03:56 AM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 19,825
TurkeyHunter Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 19,825
[Linked Image]


To be determined
Re: Naval Gunnery Question [Re: Homer Jay] #8752802 12/08/22 04:08 AM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,981
T
T Bone Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
T
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,981
The Texas was one of the older battleships off the coast of Normandy for D-Day, if my memory serves. The captain made the decision to come in close (to the point that it risked running aground) to provide fire support for the landing crafts and troops when the invasion stalled.

Neptune, by Craig L. Symonds is a great audiobook-


Originally Posted by Jungleexplorer
I really hate to do what I am about to do, because it will be very painful for you.


Re: Naval Gunnery Question [Re: T Bone] #8752808 12/08/22 04:23 AM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 19,825
TurkeyHunter Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 19,825
Originally Posted by T Bone
The Texas was one of the older battleships off the coast of Normandy for D-Day, if my memory serves. The captain made the decision to come in close (to the point that it risked running aground) to provide fire support for the landing crafts and troops when the invasion stalled.

Neptune, by Craig L. Symonds is a great audiobook-


In the article picture you can see the USS Texas receiving shore battery file. The article is good as well.

https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/uss-texas-battery-hamburg-1944


To be determined
Re: Naval Gunnery Question [Re: Homer Jay] #8752844 12/08/22 11:33 AM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 274
L
LarryT Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
L
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 274
This is wild. Mush respect for "The Greatest Generation" I've always wished we still had the battleships active.
Watching film footage of a battleship firing in no way gives you any clue to the true nature of the effect of a main battery salvo. Even one turret firing causes minor damage aboard a ship. Toilets crack, the deck ignites, and woe to anyone forward of a safe zone. If they survive the blast concussion, bones shatter, eardrums rupture, and heads ache long afterwards. The air becomes thick with yellowish-brown smoke from each salvo as men rush to swab the deck before the next round in an effort to prevent fires. It requires the explosion of several hundred pounds of gunpowder, hand loaded into the breach of each gun to propel a 1,300-pound projectile onto a target miles away. Aboard Texas, the main guns were fired electrically, but loaded manually. A sustained firefight led to coordinated frenzy, as men loaded the guns, swept the decks, and braced for the next round.


LarryT

Simper Fi.

Once & Always
Re: Naval Gunnery Question [Re: Homer Jay] #8752890 12/08/22 12:52 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,768
jeh7mmmag Offline
gramps
Offline
gramps
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,768
Would be hard to consider deploying BB these day. Can't hid from them like the Turpitz tried to do during WW2.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_battleship_Tirpitz

Drones, missiles, start bomb, even nuclear programable smart torpedoes with range of 6000 KN miles, satellites, and radar.


Quote
Forbes Contributing writer and Defense Expert Peter Suciu explains why the era of the battleships is truly over: For military history buffs, there is no doubt something romantic about the notion of seeing the United States Navy’s “big gun” fast-battleships steaming out to sea again. It is true that all four of the warships of the Iowa-class, the largest battleships ever built in the United States, were preserved intact so that they’d be able to return to duty. There is occasionally still talk about seeing them back in active service.

However, such dreams aren’t like to come true – and not just because smaller and more mobile guided-missile destroyers can do the job of shore bombardment better. While described as “fast battleships,” the Navy’s warships would require massive crews and would simply be inviting targets in the era of hypersonic missiles and stealth aircraft. It would likely require a significant makeover, and the United States currently lacks the naval facilities to even take on such a refit.

Preserving History
Today, eight retired U.S. Navy battleships have been maintained as some of the nation’s most impressive floating museums. In addition to the role each played in service of the country in wartime, the retired vessels share a similar story – the elements have taken a drastic toll on those once majestic vessels.
The USS Texas is currently undergoing repairs as her hull is leaking, while significant restorations were required to save the South Dakota-class USS Massachusetts. A special cofferdam was even required to preserve USS North Carolina, another South Dakota-class battleship built just prior to United States’ entry into World War II.

The four Iowa-class battlewagons are generally considered to be in better condition, but USS New Jersey recently underwent the first major replacement of its wood decks in decades. Time continues to be the greatest enemy these warships have faced, and with each passing year, any effort to return them would be a massive undertaking.
There is another issue that would likely keep any Iowa-class battleships from seeing them returned to service – a lack of spare parts. Warships require specialized components and to maintain the Battleship New Jersey museum, volunteers have had to head over to the nearby Inactive Fleet at the Philadelphia Navy Yard to scavenge what they can find.
More:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/w...mp;cvid=480d448edf854a59a637c38949e2546f


�Everybody needs beauty as well as bread, places to play in and pray in,
where nature may heal and give strength to body and soul.�
~ John Muir
Re: Naval Gunnery Question [Re: TurkeyHunter] #8752909 12/08/22 01:13 PM
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 12,767
P
Paluxy Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
P
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 12,767
Originally Posted by TurkeyHunter
Originally Posted by T Bone
The Texas was one of the older battleships off the coast of Normandy for D-Day, if my memory serves. The captain made the decision to come in close (to the point that it risked running aground) to provide fire support for the landing crafts and troops when the invasion stalled.

Neptune, by Craig L. Symonds is a great audiobook-


In the article picture you can see the USS Texas receiving shore battery file. The article is good as well.

https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/uss-texas-battery-hamburg-1944


Great story!

Re: Naval Gunnery Question [Re: Homer Jay] #8752919 12/08/22 01:19 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,768
jeh7mmmag Offline
gramps
Offline
gramps
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,768
War Ships are limited in their ability to get close in due to their draft requirements of 20 foot+ for light destroyers, 30+ for Cruiser, and 35+ for BB. They have to have 5+ foot of clearance due to the volume of intake of sea water for cooling of steam turbine water, evaporator for fresh water, AC, and axillary engine & generator cooling. Around most Volcanic Island the water is pretty deep close to shore. Normandy not so.

The 16 inch 50 cal guns of the BB could shoot a 1900# HE 24 miles or an AP 2700# 21 miles using 6x 60# bags of powder per shot.

The IJN had 2 super battleships with 18 inch gun. Range of 27 miles. Sank by hits from our dive bomber and torpedo bombers


�Everybody needs beauty as well as bread, places to play in and pray in,
where nature may heal and give strength to body and soul.�
~ John Muir
Re: Naval Gunnery Question [Re: Homer Jay] #8752932 12/08/22 01:27 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,768
jeh7mmmag Offline
gramps
Offline
gramps
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,768
A short and good Pictorial History of most Battle Ships of Pearl Harbour. Even the Oklahoma (above) is listed

Battleship Row: The Nine American Vessels Targeted During the Attack on Pearl Harbor

Pearl Harbour


�Everybody needs beauty as well as bread, places to play in and pray in,
where nature may heal and give strength to body and soul.�
~ John Muir
Re: Naval Gunnery Question [Re: Homer Jay] #8752971 12/08/22 01:49 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 29,609
S
SapperTitan Offline
Taking Requests
Offline
Taking Requests
S
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 29,609
I would think they would want to be as close as possible while also staying out of enemy indirect fire range. Closer would probably equate to more rounds on target but you don’t want to be close enough for the enemy to hit you.

Re: Naval Gunnery Question [Re: TurkeyHunter] #8753015 12/08/22 02:30 PM
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,972
D
Dry Fire Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
D
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,972
Originally Posted by TurkeyHunter

In the article picture you can see the USS Texas receiving shore battery file. The article is good as well.

https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/uss-texas-battery-hamburg-1944


After D Day, Texas was forced to return to England to repair and re arm. She returned back on station on June 11th. On June 15th, USS Texas was given a fire mission that was beyond the range of her guns. The captain ordered the starboard sided to be flooded so the ship would list at 2 degrees to enable the port side to hit its assigned target.


Link


coffee spelled backwards is eeffoc. I don't give eeffoc until I have my morning coffee.
Re: Naval Gunnery Question [Re: Homer Jay] #8753043 12/08/22 03:01 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,768
jeh7mmmag Offline
gramps
Offline
gramps
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,768
Unbelievable help the citizens of USA provided in all ways for Vets trying to get back home.


Quote
Bringing Home The 8 Million Boys After WWII; Operation Magic Carpet
Snip/
The U.S. Navy aircraft carrier USS Saratoga (CV-3) during her role as a troop transport in operation “Magic Carpet”. By the end of her “Magic Carpet” service, Saratoga had brought home a total of 29,204 Pacific War veterans, more than any other individual ship.

https://www.warhistoryonline.com/world-war-ii/brining-home-8-million-boys-wwii.html?edg-c=1


�Everybody needs beauty as well as bread, places to play in and pray in,
where nature may heal and give strength to body and soul.�
~ John Muir
Re: Naval Gunnery Question [Re: Homer Jay] #8753144 12/08/22 04:15 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 19,825
TurkeyHunter Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 19,825








To be determined
Re: Naval Gunnery Question [Re: Homer Jay] #8753148 12/08/22 04:22 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 394
J
jeffnsa Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
J
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 394
The current 5 inch guns on cruisers can shoot 8 miles and be within 25yd of accuracy. the 16 inch on battle ships where 2300lbs and 23 miles. I never got to shoot the 16in gun but i got to see a broad side salvo from half a mile away.

Re: Naval Gunnery Question [Re: Homer Jay] #8753931 12/09/22 02:28 PM
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 716
U
upsslim Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
U
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 716
When I was at Phan Rang Vietnam a battleship was off the coast firing right over the base. We were told it was 10 miles off the coast. When the projectile went over it sounded just like the rockets that the VC shot at us. We would hear it going over then hear the boom from it being shot and then hear the boom when it hit. The first time I heard it I was looking for a bunker. I thought we were under attack. I can't imagine being on the ship when they fired.


East Texas
Patriot Guard Rider
Flag Captain
Re: Naval Gunnery Question [Re: Dry Fire] #8754369 12/10/22 02:36 AM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 8,152
Homer Jay Offline OP
THF Trophy Hunter
OP Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 8,152
Originally Posted by Dry Fire
Originally Posted by TurkeyHunter

In the article picture you can see the USS Texas receiving shore battery file. The article is good as well.

https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/uss-texas-battery-hamburg-1944


After D Day, Texas was forced to return to England to repair and re arm. She returned back on station on June 11th. On June 15th, USS Texas was given a fire mission that was beyond the range of her guns. The captain ordered the starboard sided to be flooded so the ship would list at 2 degrees to enable the port side to hit its assigned target.


Link


The torpedo blisters on that side were flooded.


"Like a slice of fried gold!"
Re: Naval Gunnery Question [Re: Homer Jay] #8754556 12/10/22 03:15 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,029
H
huntingbig8 Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
H
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,029
Cool post and discussion, no matter which topic is brought up and discussed about The Greatest Generation I stand in awe of the young men and what they did. As a father of 3 young men I can't imagine the sacrifices made and the incredible feats they pulled off in every branch of the service.

Re: Naval Gunnery Question [Re: Homer Jay] #8754666 12/10/22 06:10 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,725
T
tigger Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
T
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,725
Thanks for all these post


Tigger
If it isn't white it is not a birddog.

KC
Lying is lying. Don't bitch about one doing it and condone another. That's called hypocrisy.
_________________
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3