Forums46
Topics538,949
Posts9,743,308
Members87,128
|
Most Online25,604 Feb 12th, 2024
|
|
|
Sig Sauer M400 vs Colt LE 6920 hmmm?
#6255574
04/11/16 06:33 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 461
DeerT
OP
Bird Dog
|
OP
Bird Dog
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 461 |
It's between one of these two...what say you? Pros and cons of each? Will be my first so be gentle I'm leaning towards the Colt just cuz of tradition and the classic "black gun" look but liked the Sig also. Thanks
|
|
|
Re: Sig Sauer M400 vs Colt LE 6920 hmmm?
[Re: DeerT]
#6255680
04/11/16 07:50 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 746
TTUhunter4
Tracker
|
Tracker
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 746 |
Both are great guns. Can't go wrong either way. If you like the Colt, pull the trigger!
"God made man, but Samuel Colt made them equal."
|
|
|
Re: Sig Sauer M400 vs Colt LE 6920 hmmm?
[Re: DeerT]
#6255697
04/11/16 08:04 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 29,609
SapperTitan
Taking Requests
|
Taking Requests
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 29,609 |
Whatever you do upgrade the trigger from that 5.5 lb mil spec trigger its completely worth the money.
|
|
|
Re: Sig Sauer M400 vs Colt LE 6920 hmmm?
[Re: DeerT]
#6255839
04/11/16 10:03 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,389
BassCat'99
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,389 |
Sapper when are you going to learn how to ride that hover board? And yes upgrade the trigger, I went with a CMC.
22 Creedmoor
|
|
|
Re: Sig Sauer M400 vs Colt LE 6920 hmmm?
[Re: DeerT]
#6256101
04/12/16 12:42 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,101
Colt W. Knight
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,101 |
I bought a 6920, accurate and reliable. Not one ftf or fte in almost 2000 rounds, and half of those were cheapo tula steel case. I've cleaned it once. Military spec triggers do suck, I plan to upgrade mine eventually
|
|
|
Re: Sig Sauer M400 vs Colt LE 6920 hmmm?
[Re: DeerT]
#6256682
04/12/16 03:13 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,212
Korean Redneck
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,212 |
First of all, i would highly recommend the JP spring kit. Super easy to install. Won't do anything for cleanliness of feel but drastically reduces weight even for a standard milspec like the one i have.
Without having or shot much of either, I'd go Colt just because it is the more iconic name in AR's. Apparently from what i read online, for those in the know they always get Colt small parts kit because they are supposed to be the best.
I'm a dude who likes long barrels!
|
|
|
Re: Sig Sauer M400 vs Colt LE 6920 hmmm?
[Re: DeerT]
#6257101
04/12/16 08:38 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 632
Tim9880
Tracker
|
Tracker
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 632 |
If you read that whole link you just posted the same dude says the sig m400s are twice as bad....
|
|
|
Re: Sig Sauer M400 vs Colt LE 6920 hmmm?
[Re: Tim9880]
#6257114
04/12/16 08:50 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 746
TTUhunter4
Tracker
|
Tracker
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 746 |
If you read that whole link you just posted the same dude says the sig m400s are twice as bad.... lol he sure does. Oh the Internet.
"God made man, but Samuel Colt made them equal."
|
|
|
Re: Sig Sauer M400 vs Colt LE 6920 hmmm?
[Re: Korean Redneck]
#6258209
04/13/16 04:15 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,586
ckat
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,586 |
First of all, i would highly recommend the JP spring kit. Super easy to install. Won't do anything for cleanliness of feel but drastically reduces weight even for a standard milspec like the one i have.
Without having or shot much of either, I'd go Colt just because it is the more iconic name in AR's. Apparently from what i read online, for those in the know they always get Colt small parts kit because they are supposed to be the best. This plus an ALG ACT trigger make a very good "budget" trigger. Not a top-tier $200+ trigger, but very good for the money. A major upgrade from the factory triggers.
|
|
|
Re: Sig Sauer M400 vs Colt LE 6920 hmmm?
[Re: DeerT]
#6258227
04/13/16 04:28 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 461
DeerT
OP
Bird Dog
|
OP
Bird Dog
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 461 |
Thanks. I keep reading on-line about the "tight fit" the Sig has over the Colt. Numerous reviews. I unfortunately was not looking for that when I held them. I was mostly going for feel. I'm sure it's a cheap change out but I preferred the grip on the Sig and didn't really like the "finger groove" on Colt grip. BUT because so many parts can be changed on these I am also mostly going on reliability of the "guts". Thanks again
|
|
|
Re: Sig Sauer M400 vs Colt LE 6920 hmmm?
[Re: DeerT]
#6258635
04/13/16 09:09 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,195
Tactical Cowboy
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,195 |
Thanks. I keep reading on-line about the "tight fit" the Sig has over the Colt. Numerous reviews. I unfortunately was not looking for that when I held them. I was mostly going for feel. I'm sure it's a cheap change out but I preferred the grip on the Sig and didn't really like the "finger groove" on Colt grip. BUT because so many parts can be changed on these I am also mostly going on reliability of the "guts". Thanks again Then build your own, or buy an Oracle.
The secret to a long life is to try not to shorten it.
|
|
|
Re: Sig Sauer M400 vs Colt LE 6920 hmmm?
[Re: DeerT]
#6260702
04/15/16 01:17 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 181
MikeTX
Woodsman
|
Woodsman
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 181 |
I was in the same position last year and went with the Colt. I never did get to compare them. I upgraded the trigger to an RRA two stage and put a quad rail on it. It's my favorite gun.
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, hetman, jeh7mmmag, JustWingem, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, rifleman, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, TreeBass, txcornhusker
|