Forums46
Topics538,111
Posts9,733,102
Members87,069
|
Most Online25,604 Feb 12th, 2024
|
|
|
Re: Part II of Nav's "Now that I am at a computer"
[Re: Navasot]
#5386710
10/29/14 04:10 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,830
Grosvenor
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,830 |
I think I still would have low balled him. Great deer. Now I just gotta figure out who I'm gonna bill for all the time I spent on THF this morning.
Last edited by Grosvenor; 10/29/14 04:13 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Part II of Nav's "Now that I am at a computer"
[Re: Jkd106]
#5386714
10/29/14 04:13 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 28,032
Navasot
Hollywood
|
Hollywood
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 28,032 |
Yea after seeing dead pics, of Nav's, no doubt he was bigger than the TC pics showed , very nice deer, I under estimated the Goliad, big 8s look better on the wall than the tape, but that gets a lot of people. Both super deer and I love this forum. Thanks Stx for a fun thread. I believe this helps everyone. He surprised me once I seen him for the first time on the hoof also...I had nothing but IR pics of him I didn't even know the antlers were dark colored.
|
|
|
Re: Part II of Nav's "Now that I am at a computer"
[Re: stxranchman]
#5386741
10/29/14 04:22 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 8,719
cameron00
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 8,719 |
Wow, very impressive Nav.
|
|
|
Re: Part II of Nav's "Now that I am at a computer"
[Re: Jkd106]
#5386751
10/29/14 04:25 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 60,296
stxranchman
OP
Obie Juan Kenobi
|
OP
Obie Juan Kenobi
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 60,296 |
Yea after seeing dead pics, of Nav's, no doubt he was bigger than the TC pics showed , very nice deer, I under estimated the Goliad, big 8s look better on the wall than the tape, but that gets a lot of people. Both super deer and I love this forum. Thanks Stx for a fun thread. I believe this helps everyone. This thread was about the problems we have when trying to judge deer from pics and trying to get guesses on spreads for AR's for pics. What angle the buck is standing in a pic can change what we see and how we see it. It can humble anyone. I miss my share on here. The Goliad buck was killed in late Dec 2012 in a year that it only rained 9" from May till Jan. He was 7+ on age and poor as a snake. He did show up till after Thanksgiving on TC. I had not seen a deer on the ground here or found a shed so I was working off guesses just like this thread was about. If I had been Nav and had those pics to go by I still don't think I could have made the decision to shoot without study the deer long and hard when he was standing in front of me.
Are idiots multiplying faster than normal people?
|
|
|
Re: Part II of Nav's "Now that I am at a computer"
[Re: cameron00]
#5386756
10/29/14 04:27 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 28,032
Navasot
Hollywood
|
Hollywood
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 28,032 |
Wow, very impressive Nav. Thanks and you were right about body weight in the county.. use to not see a deer over 120lbs just for the reason of there not being many bucks over 3yrs old. I almost didn't get this one loaded in the buggy by myself... been some big changes in the county the last few years
|
|
|
Re: Part II of Nav's "Now that I am at a computer"
[Re: stxranchman]
#5386815
10/29/14 04:44 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,549
redchevy
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,549 |
Dang Nav missed yours by a long shot, was close on Goliad though.
It's hell eatin em live
|
|
|
Re: Part II of Nav's "Now that I am at a computer"
[Re: stxranchman]
#5386836
10/29/14 04:52 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 44,461
rifleman
Sparkly Pants
|
Sparkly Pants
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 44,461 |
I bet the same spread, Nav's scored more, STX's was older & Nav's heavier, both had 4 legs.
|
|
|
Re: Part II of Nav's "Now that I am at a computer"
[Re: Grosvenor]
#5386837
10/29/14 04:53 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 270
Threelranch
Bird Dog
|
Bird Dog
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 270 |
#1 is 13 1/4 wide score around 123 #2 is 14 1/2 wide score around 128 Looking at this on my phone also so might be off just a hair That might a pretty long hair then..since you could be off on one, or two or three or four of those guesses. Nope thats what they are unless you want to bring them somewhere and meet up and score them .What you may not know is i am a grad from a and m and did studies with Greg Simons, Ruben Cantu, Steve Nellea and i have been involed with the TPW for over 25 years so i think i know a little but hey think what you will. This feller is feisty! Or Why do ya'll always jump to the troll thing ? i guess no one can second guess or quetion the ones that have 40k in post when i dont have but a few ? I am stating what i know and see good lord , it would be nice if ya'll wasnt so quick to judge and be like that!!!
|
|
|
Re: Part II of Nav's "Now that I am at a computer"
[Re: stxranchman]
#5386848
10/29/14 05:02 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,549
redchevy
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,549 |
Your not the first to call him out. For the record most who do are wrong. I was.
For every year of experience you have in a classroom he probably has two hands on.
It's hell eatin em live
|
|
|
Re: Part II of Nav's "Now that I am at a computer"
[Re: Threelranch]
#5386854
10/29/14 05:04 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 60,296
stxranchman
OP
Obie Juan Kenobi
|
OP
Obie Juan Kenobi
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 60,296 |
Why do ya'll always jump to the troll thing ? i guess no one can second guess or quetion the ones that have 40k in post when i dont have but a few ? I am stating what i know and see good lord , it would be nice if ya'll wasnt so quick to judge and be like that!!!
Don't mind them Threelranch. It is close to hunting season and they are getting edgy. It is a forum and what we can't see is how serious someone is about their posts or replies to posts. Almost all of mine are made when I smiling as a type. I have a great sense of humor, hence the at the end of my reply back to you. Have fun on here since life is to short.
Are idiots multiplying faster than normal people?
|
|
|
Re: Part II of Nav's "Now that I am at a computer"
[Re: rifleman]
#5386901
10/29/14 05:24 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 28,032
Navasot
Hollywood
|
Hollywood
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 28,032 |
I bet the same spread, Nav's scored more, STX's was older & Nav's heavier, both had 4 legs. Your dang PMs are full while ur at it
|
|
|
Re: Part II of Nav's "Now that I am at a computer"
[Re: stxranchman]
#5386916
10/29/14 05:30 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 44,461
rifleman
Sparkly Pants
|
Sparkly Pants
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 44,461 |
Made some room so y'all can congratulate me on being correct.
|
|
|
Re: Part II of Nav's "Now that I am at a computer"
[Re: rifleman]
#5386947
10/29/14 05:37 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 8,719
cameron00
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 8,719 |
Made some room so y'all can congratulate me on being correct. Did you get those pics I sent you of my new pair of chaps?
|
|
|
Re: Part II of Nav's "Now that I am at a computer"
[Re: stxranchman]
#5386965
10/29/14 05:43 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 44,461
rifleman
Sparkly Pants
|
Sparkly Pants
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 44,461 |
No, and if you feel the urge to PM me a pic of a guy in ***less chaps, please send it to my secondary account, txshntr.
|
|
|
Re: Part II of Nav's "Now that I am at a computer"
[Re: rifleman]
#5386967
10/29/14 05:44 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 28,032
Navasot
Hollywood
|
Hollywood
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 28,032 |
No, and if you feel the urge to PM me a pic of a guy in ***less chaps, please send it to my secondary account, txshntr. I was working on this as we speak
|
|
|
Re: Part II of Nav's "Now that I am at a computer"
[Re: stxranchman]
#5386969
10/29/14 05:45 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 28,032
Navasot
Hollywood
|
Hollywood
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 28,032 |
wait.... just the chaps no guy... chicks wear them to you know
|
|
|
Re: Part II of Nav's "Now that I am at a computer"
[Re: rifleman]
#5386975
10/29/14 05:47 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 35,891
txshntr
T-Rex Arms
|
T-Rex Arms
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 35,891 |
No, and if you feel the urge to PM me a pic of a guy in ***less chaps, please send it to my secondary account, txshntr.
|
|
|
Re: Part II of Nav's "Now that I am at a computer"
[Re: stxranchman]
#5387013
10/29/14 05:59 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 28,032
Navasot
Hollywood
|
Hollywood
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 28,032 |
|
|
|
Re: Part II of Nav's "Now that I am at a computer"
[Re: stxranchman]
#5387149
10/29/14 07:15 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 13,451
Seadog
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 13,451 |
I support Cap and Trade - Cap our spending and Trade Obama
I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the Government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them. - Thomas Jefferson
|
|
|
Re: Part II of Nav's "Now that I am at a computer"
[Re: rifleman]
#5387158
10/29/14 07:20 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 259
RossCravens
Bird Dog
|
Bird Dog
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 259 |
No, and if you feel the urge to PM me a pic of a guy in ***less chaps, please send it to my secondary account, txshntr. hahaha Thanks for the thread stx...helps make these terribly long, slow days leading up to opening morning a little less painful!
Gig 'Em
Ross Cravens Class of '10
"From the outside looking in, you can't understand it. And from the inside looking out, you can't explain it."
|
|
|
Re: Part II of Nav's "Now that I am at a computer"
[Re: txshntr]
#5387230
10/29/14 07:54 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 60,296
stxranchman
OP
Obie Juan Kenobi
|
OP
Obie Juan Kenobi
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 60,296 |
No, and if you feel the urge to PM me a pic of a guy in ***less chaps, please send it to my secondary account, txshntr. I sure hope djones doesn't see this....
Are idiots multiplying faster than normal people?
|
|
|
Re: Part II of Nav's "Now that I am at a computer"
[Re: rifleman]
#5387274
10/29/14 08:23 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 12,158
kry226
The General
|
The General
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 12,158 |
Made some room so y'all can congratulate me on being correct. Exercising your Google-Foo again?
|
|
|
Re: Part II of Nav's "Now that I am at a computer"
[Re: stxranchman]
#5387310
10/29/14 08:47 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 270
Threelranch
Bird Dog
|
Bird Dog
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 270 |
Okay....for the width part They both were 13 6/8" inside spread. So neither bucks was wider or narrow than the other one. Some got the spread right (after some waffling) on one but not the other.... As far as score some really blew it. Nav' bucks grossed 144 5/8" and the buck my Dad killed grossed 129 7/8". So Nav's was bigger by a lot. It was fun and I won a couple of cases of beer off the Da Clown They both were 13 6/8" inside spreadThats a real hard to belive they are both the same to the 6/8 th but Nav' bucks grossed 144 5/8"I would have to put my hands on that one to see cause i dont see it form the blury pic.
|
|
|
Re: Part II of Nav's "Now that I am at a computer"
[Re: Threelranch]
#5387328
10/29/14 08:54 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 35,891
txshntr
T-Rex Arms
|
T-Rex Arms
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 35,891 |
Okay....for the width part They both were 13 6/8" inside spread. So neither bucks was wider or narrow than the other one. Some got the spread right (after some waffling) on one but not the other.... As far as score some really blew it. Nav' bucks grossed 144 5/8" and the buck my Dad killed grossed 129 7/8". So Nav's was bigger by a lot. It was fun and I won a couple of cases of beer off the Da Clown They both were 13 6/8" inside spreadThats a real hard to belive they are both the same to the 6/8 th but Nav' bucks grossed 144 5/8"I would have to put my hands on that one to see cause i dont see it form the blury pic. Nav's buck
|
|
|
Re: Part II of Nav's "Now that I am at a computer"
[Re: Threelranch]
#5387331
10/29/14 08:55 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 28,032
Navasot
Hollywood
|
Hollywood
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 28,032 |
Okay....for the width part They both were 13 6/8" inside spread. So neither bucks was wider or narrow than the other one. Some got the spread right (after some waffling) on one but not the other.... As far as score some really blew it. Nav' bucks grossed 144 5/8" and the buck my Dad killed grossed 129 7/8". So Nav's was bigger by a lot. It was fun and I won a couple of cases of beer off the Da Clown They both were 13 6/8" inside spreadThats a real hard to belive they are both the same to the 6/8 th but Nav' bucks grossed 144 5/8"I would have to put my hands on that one to see cause i dont see it form the blury pic. I didn't see it either till the tape was put to him. the 35inches of mass, almost 43 inches on the MBs helped him alot
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, hetman, jeh7mmmag, JustWingem, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, rifleman, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, TreeBass, txcornhusker
|