texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
TexasAg99, Debra99, runklesportshop, jrperkins, Vsherrod
72160 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,817
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,612
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 44,239
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics539,420
Posts9,749,367
Members87,160
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 3 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered [Re: beech96w] #4633850 10/06/13 01:42 AM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 620
O
Octopiston Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
O
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 620
Originally Posted By: beech96w
Some of your open carry advocates and promoters:





Black panthers do exist! So does Bigfoot.

Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered [Re: cdoan02] #4634049 10/06/13 03:00 AM
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 751
Core-Lokt Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 751
Originally Posted By: cdoan02
I'd go so far as to say those guys in that picture are the epitome of what the 2nd amendment stands for.

And I'd be happy to discuss it.
All right; let's hear it.

I'm going to tell you what I see: Intimidation. The New Black Panthers are thugs using the aegis of 2A to further their ends.

Quote:
The New Black Pan­ther Party(NBPP), the largest orga­nized anti-Semitic and racist black mil­i­tant group in Amer­ica, has announced plans to expand its inter­na­tional activ­ity and out­reach after a del­e­ga­tion of its lead­ers returned from a March trip to South Africa and Zimbabwe.

In the group’s online radio broad­casts on Black Power Radio in April, the NBPP lead­er­ship dis­cussed the trip and their plans to increase mem­ber­ship through addi­tional out­reach in South Amer­ica, the Caribbean, Canada and the rest of Africa.

In South Africa, the del­e­ga­tion met with mem­bers of the Pan-Africanist Con­gress of Aza­nia, a minor pan-African polit­i­cal party, and in Zim­babwe they met with Pres­i­dent Robert Mugabe’s cab­i­net (Mugabe did not attend the meet­ing). NBPP National Chair­man Malik Zulu Shabazz later made his sup­port for the Zim­bab­wean dic­ta­tor clear, offer­ing to have a web­cast up on the NBPP web­site “within 60 days” in sup­port of Mugabe in the upcom­ing elec­tions. He also hopes to have the web­cast shown on the Nation of Islam (NOI)’s website.

Shabazz also said that over 200 Black orga­ni­za­tions from around the world will con­vene in South Africa for a con­fer­ence focus­ing on pan-Africanism on June 16, 2014, the anniver­sary of the Soweto Stu­dent Upris­ing that took place on the same day in 1976. Shabazz explained that Africa should be as cen­tral to African-Americans as “Israel is to the so-called Jew and all over the so-called Jew­ish Diaspora.”

Mem­ber­ship reports on the recent trip to Africa on Black Power Radio have fre­quently devolved into hate­ful rhetoric against whites, Jews, and other groups. National Spokesman Chawn Kweli referred to the NYPD as the “Jew York Police Depart­ment” and to the “Zionist-Jewish con­trolled media out­lets.” National Field Mar­shal King Samir Shabazz, prone to often vio­lent racist rants, called on NBPP mem­bers to shine their boots and press their uni­forms, adding that the “crease should be able to cut that cracker’s throat in half and watch his head roll down the street.”

Samir Shabazz also called on Black Mus­lims to make their Hajj to Africa instead of to Mecca. “I hate to say this but Mecca is not my home. I’m a Mus­lim but…I can’t see myself walk­ing around no black stone with those God­damn crack­ers any­way.” Instead of par­tic­i­pat­ing in the rit­ual act of throw­ing stones dur­ing the pil­grim­age to Mecca with “smelly Arabs and crack­ers,” he indi­cated that he would rather go to Africa and “throw some stones at six white peck­er­woods.” Samir Shabazz also went on a [censored]­pho­bic rant, express­ing dis­may at see­ing same-sex cou­ples in Africa. He said that it “blew his mind” since he didn’t know that “the white man got Africans fag­gin’ and sag­gin’ like they do in America.”
LINK

So, other than the Constitutional right afforded to citizens not otherwise disqualified, what makes these thugs the epitome of what the 2A stands for? To show "they won't be pushed around", even knowing that unless you're black your demise is a goal of theirs? This isn't remotely close to the numbnuts at Starbucks.


Core-Lokt:The deadliest mushroom in the woods
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered [Re: Core-Lokt] #4634200 10/06/13 04:07 AM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 110,817
dogcatcher Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 110,817
Originally Posted By: Core-Lokt

I'm going to tell you what I see: Intimidation. The New Black Panthers are thugs using the aegis of 2A to further their ends.


Do you think the public in general will think you are any better than the Black Panthers? I think the comments on here from gun owners has shown that being an arse like the Black Panthers will not farther the agenda. I think it will hurt more than help.


Combat Infantryman, the ultimate hunter where the prey shoots back.
_____________"Illegitimus non carborundum est"_______________

[Linked Image]
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered [Re: dogcatcher] #4634413 10/06/13 12:22 PM
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 751
Core-Lokt Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 751
Originally Posted By: dogcatcher
Originally Posted By: Core-Lokt

I'm going to tell you what I see: Intimidation. The New Black Panthers are thugs using the aegis of 2A to further their ends.


Do you think the public in general will think you are any better than the Black Panthers? I think the comments on here from gun owners has shown that being an arse like the Black Panthers will not farther the agenda. I think it will hurt more than help.
I would hope they do. The NBPs are a racist, militant black nationalist group.

But when you say "you", do you mean me? Because I haven't advocated blatant OC. In fact, two threads I recently responded to in the OT forum (that were later moved) I wrote that although I support OC, this is a bad time for the OC long arm crowd to try this risky gambit of asserting a right that might well be abridged or rescinded given sensationalistic press coverage of mass shootings, mid-term elections and the likelihood of one or two Supreme Court justices appointed before BHO's presidency ends.

And I did in fact specifically quote a member that did assert the NBPs were epitomizing the intent of the 2A. He posted that below the pics of the NBPs, so I can only presume he meant them, since the Starbucks mooks weren't specifically mentioned.


Core-Lokt:The deadliest mushroom in the woods
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered [Re: Core-Lokt] #4634926 10/06/13 03:47 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 110,817
dogcatcher Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 110,817
Originally Posted By: Core-Lokt
Originally Posted By: dogcatcher
Originally Posted By: Core-Lokt

I'm going to tell you what I see: Intimidation. The New Black Panthers are thugs using the aegis of 2A to further their ends.


Do you think the public in general will think you are any better than the Black Panthers? I think the comments on here from gun owners has shown that being an arse like the Black Panthers will not farther the agenda. I think it will hurt more than help.
I would hope they do. The NBPs are a racist, militant black nationalist group.

But when you say "you", do you mean me? Because I haven't advocated blatant OC. In fact, two threads I recently responded to in the OT forum (that were later moved) I wrote that although I support OC, this is a bad time for the OC long arm crowd to try this risky gambit of asserting a right that might well be abridged or rescinded given sensationalistic press coverage of mass shootings, mid-term elections and the likelihood of one or two Supreme Court justices appointed before BHO's presidency ends.

And I did in fact specifically quote a member that did assert the NBPs were epitomizing the intent of the 2A. He posted that below the pics of the NBPs, so I can only presume he meant them, since the Starbucks mooks weren't specifically mentioned.


You was used as those that support the OC.


Combat Infantryman, the ultimate hunter where the prey shoots back.
_____________"Illegitimus non carborundum est"_______________

[Linked Image]
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered [Re: dogcatcher] #4637429 10/07/13 03:31 PM
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,155
C
cdoan02 Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
C
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,155
I'll get back to this when I have some time to explain my opinion.

Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered [Re: cdoan02] #4686698 10/24/13 04:35 AM
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,155
C
cdoan02 Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
C
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,155
Alright! Time to address the picture of Black Panthers openly carrying firearms, and my stated opinion that this is the "epitome of what the 2nd amendment stands for", whatever that means...

The Black Panther Party started out as a group of black men that armed themselves to protect their fellow black citizens. Protect them from whom? From the government! Maybe we have different versions of history, but my version records a time that a predominately white police department repeatedly abused their powers to oppress the predominately black community they had sworn to protect and serve. But instead of/in addition to protecting and serving this community, the police beat, robbed, murdered members of this community. I do not make any statements regarding the personal life choices of any members of the community, or whether they were good righteous people, or evil sinful people. All I state is that the police that had sworn to protect and serve this community instead/also abused this community.

In response to the abuses being incurred upon them, they armed themselves and threatened deadly force to anyone that would come to abuse them. I believe that nobody should have to deal with being physically harmed, and that everyone has a right to protect themselves. By arming themselves, they were able to defend themselves against those that meant them harm. Pure.

But you mention those that abused the carrying of weapons? Those that would instead use their weapons to do the same things they were trying to stop?

Here is how I will explain it to you:

There are cops that would use weapons irresponsibly. Threaten with their weapon when they should not; intimidate people with their weapon for immoral purposes. Fire into crowds, at non-threatening innocents, or on purpose at those they wish to harm. This does not make me say "TAKE THE GUNS AWAY FROM ALL COPS" It makes me say lock up the piece of [censored] cops that do something to harm, or threaten to harm a fellow citizen.


There are members of the Black Panthers that would use weapons irresponsibly. Threaten with their weapon when they should not; intimidate people with their weapon for immoral purposes. Fire into crowds, at non-threatening innocents, or on purpose at those they wish to harm. This does not make me say "TAKE THE GUNS AWAY FROM ALL BLACK PANTHERS!!!!" It makes me say lock up the piece of [censored] Black Panthers that do something to harm, or threaten to harm a fellow citizen.

Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered [Re: Concho] #4804161 12/04/13 02:40 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 32
C
Cellis1981 Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 32
Here's something to think about... You've got a nut job thinking of going into a Starbucks and blowing away a dozen or more people. On his way into said Starbucks he sees a "2nd ammendment touting nutjob" with an AR strapped to his back... And he walks away... You'll never hear that story on the news.

We don't have a prayer at keeping our rights if we keep fighting each other. What is the point of having the right to bear arms if we don't exercise it? The only people bitching about this being "thrown in their face" are the ones who would rather us not have those rights. The ones who forget what this country would be like if we didn't have those rights.


"You may all go to hell, I'll go to Texas."
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered [Re: Cellis1981] #4804214 12/04/13 02:54 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 26,430
C
Concho Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
C
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 26,430
Originally Posted By: Cellis1981
Here's something to think about... You've got a nut job thinking of going into a Starbucks and blowing away a dozen or more people. On his way into said Starbucks he sees a "2nd ammendment touting nutjob" with an AR strapped to his back... And he walks away... You'll never hear that story on the news.

We don't have a prayer at keeping our rights if we keep fighting each other. What is the point of having the right to bear arms if we don't exercise it? The only people bitching about this being "thrown in their face" are the ones who would rather us not have those rights. The ones who forget what this country would be like if we didn't have those rights.


I believe that you are totally wrong, I know you are when it comes to what I know and believe. I don't need some open carry guy standing up for my rights, I will speak for myself. These open carry folks are looking for their 15 minutes on the web, nothing more......you can promote their actions anyway you want, it is still over the top. As for your idea that some "Nut Job' would be scared off my an open carry guy......goofy, he would probably just steal the guy's unloaded AR and go use it in his crime.



Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered [Re: dogcatcher] #4804828 12/04/13 11:58 AM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,058
HWY_MAN Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,058
Was listening to the Lynn Woolley on the radio when CJ Grishim called in, now he filing suit against the WPD for the mental anguish and trauma they caused his son. He lost his first case, his next ones not looking good so now he's putting his son in the spotlight. I've never seen a man more starved for attention, he's embarrassing.


Yes! A Weatherby does kill them deader.
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered [Re: robbf213] #4804835 12/04/13 12:08 PM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,058
HWY_MAN Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,058
Originally Posted By: robbf213
Originally Posted By: Octopiston
The company's stance came about from events elsewhere. Starbucks stated in an article that "some anti-gun activists have also played a role in ratcheting up the rhetoric and friction." But thats right, its only the open carrier's fault.
I haven't seen one of these local long gun open carry rallies even mention starbucks. Have you?
Costco did the same thing a few years ago after a chl holder was shot by leo in one of their parking lots. All chl holders should be tarred and feathered!!! Jared's jewelry, CVS, and Chuck E Cheese also doen't want guns in their stores either. Is that due to open carry too?
Honestly, all this hullabaloo tells me that the anti-gun propaganda machine did its job very well.

In other news. Starbucks extended a no smoking zone of 25'. Smokers should be tarred and feathered!


I doubt seriously anti-gun groups have done more than the Yoyo's like this to push this new stance.



We're I an officer and walked into that place and seen that, Mr. Bonehead would have been at gun point, Mr. Bonehead would have been on the ground, Mr. Bonehead would have been cuffed and Mr. Bonehead would have went to jail.


Yes! A Weatherby does kill them deader.
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered [Re: HWY_MAN] #4816888 12/08/13 01:45 AM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,440
T
TFF Caribou Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
T
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,440
Originally Posted By: HWY_MAN
Originally Posted By: robbf213
Originally Posted By: Octopiston
The company's stance came about from events elsewhere. Starbucks stated in an article that "some anti-gun activists have also played a role in ratcheting up the rhetoric and friction." But thats right, its only the open carrier's fault.
I haven't seen one of these local long gun open carry rallies even mention starbucks. Have you?
Costco did the same thing a few years ago after a chl holder was shot by leo in one of their parking lots. All chl holders should be tarred and feathered!!! Jared's jewelry, CVS, and Chuck E Cheese also doen't want guns in their stores either. Is that due to open carry too?
Honestly, all this hullabaloo tells me that the anti-gun propaganda machine did its job very well.

In other news. Starbucks extended a no smoking zone of 25'. Smokers should be tarred and feathered!


I doubt seriously anti-gun groups have done more than the Yoyo's like this to push this new stance.



We're I an officer and walked into that place and seen that, Mr. Bonehead would have been at gun point, Mr. Bonehead would have been on the ground, Mr. Bonehead would have been cuffed and Mr. Bonehead would have went to jail.


On what charge?

I'm starting to dislike the Long gun open carriers as well. The press is bad, and those who listen to the press flock to the polls. But until the law is changed, I don't believe he is breaking any law.


The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference. -George Washington
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered [Re: TFF Caribou] #4817782 12/08/13 02:20 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,348
SirDuke Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,348
Smiling, he doesn't like when people smile. Gives him the willys. Makes him suspicious.

Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered [Re: TFF Caribou] #4817890 12/08/13 03:12 PM
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 11,996
S
Simple Searcher Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
S
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 11,996
I do not doubt that he is a Bonehead, but I am with Savage 250, on what charge?

Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered [Re: Simple Searcher] #4818256 12/08/13 06:03 PM
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 636
W
Wool E. Booger Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
W
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 636
X'3.....on what charge? I despise the open carry boneheads myself, but then again, I despise a lot of groups. Doesn't mean they should be on the ground and go to jail just because I despise them. Just my 2cents

Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered [Re: TFF Caribou] #4818363 12/08/13 06:32 PM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,213
F
Friction Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
F
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,213
Originally Posted By: Savage 250
Originally Posted By: HWY_MAN
Originally Posted By: robbf213
Originally Posted By: Octopiston
The company's stance came about from events elsewhere. Starbucks stated in an article that "some anti-gun activists have also played a role in ratcheting up the rhetoric and friction." But thats right, its only the open carrier's fault.
I haven't seen one of these local long gun open carry rallies even mention starbucks. Have you?
Costco did the same thing a few years ago after a chl holder was shot by leo in one of their parking lots. All chl holders should be tarred and feathered!!! Jared's jewelry, CVS, and Chuck E Cheese also doen't want guns in their stores either. Is that due to open carry too?
Honestly, all this hullabaloo tells me that the anti-gun propaganda machine did its job very well.

In other news. Starbucks extended a no smoking zone of 25'. Smokers should be tarred and feathered!


I doubt seriously anti-gun groups have done more than the Yoyo's like this to push this new stance.



We're I an officer and walked into that place and seen that, Mr. Bonehead would have been at gun point, Mr. Bonehead would have been on the ground, Mr. Bonehead would have been cuffed and Mr. Bonehead would have went to jail.


On what charge?

I'm starting to dislike the Long gun open carriers as well. The press is bad, and those who listen to the press flock to the polls. But until the law is changed, I don't believe he is breaking any law.


inquiring minds want to know

popcorn

Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered [Re: HWY_MAN] #4818600 12/08/13 08:14 PM
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 595
W
webb1974 Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
W
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 595
Originally Posted By: HWY_MAN
Originally Posted By: robbf213
Originally Posted By: Octopiston
The company's stance came about from events elsewhere. Starbucks stated in an article that "some anti-gun activists have also played a role in ratcheting up the rhetoric and friction." But thats right, its only the open carrier's fault.
I haven't seen one of these local long gun open carry rallies even mention starbucks. Have you?
Costco did the same thing a few years ago after a chl holder was shot by leo in one of their parking lots. All chl holders should be tarred and feathered!!! Jared's jewelry, CVS, and Chuck E Cheese also doen't want guns in their stores either. Is that due to open carry too?
Honestly, all this hullabaloo tells me that the anti-gun propaganda machine did its job very well.

In other news. Starbucks extended a no smoking zone of 25'. Smokers should be tarred and feathered!


I doubt seriously anti-gun groups have done more than the Yoyo's like this to push this new stance.



We're I an officer and walked into that place and seen that, Mr. Bonehead would have been at gun point, Mr. Bonehead would have been on the ground, Mr. Bonehead would have been cuffed and Mr. Bonehead would have went to jail.


Whatever side of the fence someone is on statements like this have to bother you. I dont know Hwyman and not saying he is or was in law enforcement but its scary to think there are law enforcers with this mentality.

Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered [Re: webb1974] #4821200 12/09/13 05:37 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,105
B
Beretta Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
B
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,105
Originally Posted By: webb1974
Originally Posted By: HWY_MAN
Originally Posted By: robbf213
Originally Posted By: Octopiston
The company's stance came about from events elsewhere. Starbucks stated in an article that "some anti-gun activists have also played a role in ratcheting up the rhetoric and friction." But thats right, its only the open carrier's fault.
I haven't seen one of these local long gun open carry rallies even mention starbucks. Have you?
Costco did the same thing a few years ago after a chl holder was shot by leo in one of their parking lots. All chl holders should be tarred and feathered!!! Jared's jewelry, CVS, and Chuck E Cheese also doen't want guns in their stores either. Is that due to open carry too?
Honestly, all this hullabaloo tells me that the anti-gun propaganda machine did its job very well.
Y
In other news. Starbucks extended a no smoking zone of 25'. Smokers should be tarred and feathered!


I doubt seriously anti-gun groups have done more than the Yoyo's like this to push this new stance.



We're I an officer and walked into that place and seen that, Mr. Bonehead would have been at gun point, Mr. Bonehead would have been on the ground, Mr. Bonehead would have been cuffed and Mr. Bonehead would have went to jail.


Whatever side of the fence someone is on statements like this have to bother you. I dont know Hwyman and not saying he is or was in law enforcement but its scary to think there are law enforcers with this mentality.


Bingo, I am also waiting to hear what bogus charge hwyman would be hauling this guy to jail for.


Originally Posted By: Jeff Elder
Two kinds of people vote democrat. Rich people that don't have to work, and poor people who don't want to work.
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered [Re: Beretta] #4821293 12/09/13 06:01 PM
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,155
C
cdoan02 Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
C
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,155
Ummm... The answer is pretty obvious. See: CJ Grisham.

An officer can go up to a law abiding citizen, instigate a confrontation, then arrest the "suspect" on any number of charges related to the confrontation. Resisting arrest, interference with a public official, etc.

Unfortunately, HWYMAN has already proven LEOs have the ability to do so.

It's certainly changed my perception. Police are elite, we are simple subjects. Laws mean nothing: the POLICE are the LAW.

Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered [Re: Beretta] #4821419 12/09/13 06:28 PM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,213
F
Friction Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
F
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,213
Originally Posted By: BerettaOnyx686
Originally Posted By: webb1974
Originally Posted By: HWY_MAN
Originally Posted By: robbf213


I doubt seriously anti-gun groups have done more than the Yoyo's like this to push this new stance.



We're I an officer and walked into that place and seen that, Mr. Bonehead would have been at gun point, Mr. Bonehead would have been on the ground, Mr. Bonehead would have been cuffed and Mr. Bonehead would have went to jail.


Whatever side of the fence someone is on statements like this have to bother you. I dont know Hwyman and not saying he is or was in law enforcement but its scary to think there are law enforcers with this mentality.


Bingo, I am also waiting to hear what bogus charge hwyman would be hauling this guy to jail for.


free bump for hwyman popcorn

Last edited by Trek; 12/09/13 06:29 PM.
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered [Re: cdoan02] #4821583 12/09/13 07:07 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,087
J
Jasb Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
J
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,087
Originally Posted By: cdoan02
Ummm... The answer is pretty obvious. See: CJ Grisham.

An officer can go up to a law abiding citizen, instigate a confrontation, then arrest the "suspect" on any number of charges related to the confrontation. Resisting arrest, interference with a public official, etc.

Unfortunately, HWYMAN has already proven LEOs have the ability to do so.

It's certainly changed my perception. Police are elite, we are simple subjects. Laws mean nothing: the POLICE are the LAW.
You're a mess

Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered [Re: Jasb] #4821636 12/09/13 07:17 PM
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 92
M
min1kay2 Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
M
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 92
Oh, Barney Fife! Where are you?

Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered [Re: Jasb] #4821674 12/09/13 07:27 PM
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,155
C
cdoan02 Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
C
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,155
Originally Posted By: Jasb
Originally Posted By: cdoan02
Ummm... The answer is pretty obvious. See: CJ Grisham.

An officer can go up to a law abiding citizen, instigate a confrontation, then arrest the "suspect" on any number of charges related to the confrontation. Resisting arrest, interference with a public official, etc.

Unfortunately, HWYMAN has already proven LEOs have the ability to do so.

It's certainly changed my perception. Police are elite, we are simple subjects. Laws mean nothing: the POLICE are the LAW.
You're a mess


What makes me a mess?

It's been clearly proven to me that an officer has the power to approach a law-abiding citizen that is not suspected of any crime, and, without making any verbal request or command, take a personal item off of said citizen. If citizen makes any natural human movement of resistance reaction, the officer can point a handgun at the citizen's head, handcuff, and arrest said citizen. Citizen can be charged, tried, and convicted. It's clearly been proven. Just happened.

Seems to me that the police state of our society is a mess, and I'm of clear mind and body. It is entirely possible that I am messed up, and New York has it right.

Either way, I ain't open carrying a long gun anywhere other than out on private land.

Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered [Re: robbf213] #4821681 12/09/13 07:29 PM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,801
L
lharrell79 Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
L
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,801
Originally Posted By: robbf213
I doubt seriously anti-gun groups have done more than the Yoyo's like this to push this new stance.



Is this guy hunting pastries? Why does he have the shotgun in the ready position?

Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered [Re: lharrell79] #4821724 12/09/13 07:41 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,105
B
Beretta Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
B
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,105
Originally Posted By: lharrell79
Originally Posted By: robbf213
I doubt seriously anti-gun groups have done more than the Yoyo's like this to push this new stance.



Is this guy hunting pastries? Why does he have the shotgun in the ready position?


He is guessing the pastries from the cops, we all know how they tear up a pastry shop. And why does it matter how he is carrying it?


Originally Posted By: Jeff Elder
Two kinds of people vote democrat. Rich people that don't have to work, and poor people who don't want to work.
Page 3 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3