Forums46
Topics539,420
Posts9,749,367
Members87,160
|
Most Online25,604 Feb 12th, 2024
|
|
|
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered
[Re: beech96w]
#4633850
10/06/13 01:42 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 620
Octopiston
Tracker
|
Tracker
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 620 |
Some of your open carry advocates and promoters: Black panthers do exist! So does Bigfoot.
|
|
|
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered
[Re: cdoan02]
#4634049
10/06/13 03:00 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 751
Core-Lokt
Tracker
|
Tracker
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 751 |
I'd go so far as to say those guys in that picture are the epitome of what the 2nd amendment stands for.
And I'd be happy to discuss it. All right; let's hear it. I'm going to tell you what I see: Intimidation. The New Black Panthers are thugs using the aegis of 2A to further their ends. The New Black Panther Party(NBPP), the largest organized anti-Semitic and racist black militant group in America, has announced plans to expand its international activity and outreach after a delegation of its leaders returned from a March trip to South Africa and Zimbabwe.
In the group’s online radio broadcasts on Black Power Radio in April, the NBPP leadership discussed the trip and their plans to increase membership through additional outreach in South America, the Caribbean, Canada and the rest of Africa.
In South Africa, the delegation met with members of the Pan-Africanist Congress of Azania, a minor pan-African political party, and in Zimbabwe they met with President Robert Mugabe’s cabinet (Mugabe did not attend the meeting). NBPP National Chairman Malik Zulu Shabazz later made his support for the Zimbabwean dictator clear, offering to have a webcast up on the NBPP website “within 60 days” in support of Mugabe in the upcoming elections. He also hopes to have the webcast shown on the Nation of Islam (NOI)’s website.
Shabazz also said that over 200 Black organizations from around the world will convene in South Africa for a conference focusing on pan-Africanism on June 16, 2014, the anniversary of the Soweto Student Uprising that took place on the same day in 1976. Shabazz explained that Africa should be as central to African-Americans as “Israel is to the so-called Jew and all over the so-called Jewish Diaspora.”
Membership reports on the recent trip to Africa on Black Power Radio have frequently devolved into hateful rhetoric against whites, Jews, and other groups. National Spokesman Chawn Kweli referred to the NYPD as the “Jew York Police Department” and to the “Zionist-Jewish controlled media outlets.” National Field Marshal King Samir Shabazz, prone to often violent racist rants, called on NBPP members to shine their boots and press their uniforms, adding that the “crease should be able to cut that cracker’s throat in half and watch his head roll down the street.”
Samir Shabazz also called on Black Muslims to make their Hajj to Africa instead of to Mecca. “I hate to say this but Mecca is not my home. I’m a Muslim but…I can’t see myself walking around no black stone with those Goddamn crackers anyway.” Instead of participating in the ritual act of throwing stones during the pilgrimage to Mecca with “smelly Arabs and crackers,” he indicated that he would rather go to Africa and “throw some stones at six white peckerwoods.” Samir Shabazz also went on a [censored]phobic rant, expressing dismay at seeing same-sex couples in Africa. He said that it “blew his mind” since he didn’t know that “the white man got Africans faggin’ and saggin’ like they do in America.”
LINK So, other than the Constitutional right afforded to citizens not otherwise disqualified, what makes these thugs the epitome of what the 2A stands for? To show "they won't be pushed around", even knowing that unless you're black your demise is a goal of theirs? This isn't remotely close to the numbnuts at Starbucks.
Core-Lokt:The deadliest mushroom in the woods
|
|
|
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered
[Re: Core-Lokt]
#4634200
10/06/13 04:07 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 110,817
dogcatcher
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 110,817 |
I'm going to tell you what I see: Intimidation. The New Black Panthers are thugs using the aegis of 2A to further their ends.
Do you think the public in general will think you are any better than the Black Panthers? I think the comments on here from gun owners has shown that being an arse like the Black Panthers will not farther the agenda. I think it will hurt more than help.
Combat Infantryman, the ultimate hunter where the prey shoots back. _____________"Illegitimus non carborundum est"_______________
|
|
|
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered
[Re: dogcatcher]
#4634413
10/06/13 12:22 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 751
Core-Lokt
Tracker
|
Tracker
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 751 |
I'm going to tell you what I see: Intimidation. The New Black Panthers are thugs using the aegis of 2A to further their ends.
Do you think the public in general will think you are any better than the Black Panthers? I think the comments on here from gun owners has shown that being an arse like the Black Panthers will not farther the agenda. I think it will hurt more than help. I would hope they do. The NBPs are a racist, militant black nationalist group. But when you say "you", do you mean me? Because I haven't advocated blatant OC. In fact, two threads I recently responded to in the OT forum (that were later moved) I wrote that although I support OC, this is a bad time for the OC long arm crowd to try this risky gambit of asserting a right that might well be abridged or rescinded given sensationalistic press coverage of mass shootings, mid-term elections and the likelihood of one or two Supreme Court justices appointed before BHO's presidency ends. And I did in fact specifically quote a member that did assert the NBPs were epitomizing the intent of the 2A. He posted that below the pics of the NBPs, so I can only presume he meant them, since the Starbucks mooks weren't specifically mentioned.
Core-Lokt:The deadliest mushroom in the woods
|
|
|
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered
[Re: Core-Lokt]
#4634926
10/06/13 03:47 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 110,817
dogcatcher
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 110,817 |
I'm going to tell you what I see: Intimidation. The New Black Panthers are thugs using the aegis of 2A to further their ends.
Do you think the public in general will think you are any better than the Black Panthers? I think the comments on here from gun owners has shown that being an arse like the Black Panthers will not farther the agenda. I think it will hurt more than help. I would hope they do. The NBPs are a racist, militant black nationalist group. But when you say "you", do you mean me? Because I haven't advocated blatant OC. In fact, two threads I recently responded to in the OT forum (that were later moved) I wrote that although I support OC, this is a bad time for the OC long arm crowd to try this risky gambit of asserting a right that might well be abridged or rescinded given sensationalistic press coverage of mass shootings, mid-term elections and the likelihood of one or two Supreme Court justices appointed before BHO's presidency ends. And I did in fact specifically quote a member that did assert the NBPs were epitomizing the intent of the 2A. He posted that below the pics of the NBPs, so I can only presume he meant them, since the Starbucks mooks weren't specifically mentioned. You was used as those that support the OC.
Combat Infantryman, the ultimate hunter where the prey shoots back. _____________"Illegitimus non carborundum est"_______________
|
|
|
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered
[Re: dogcatcher]
#4637429
10/07/13 03:31 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,155
cdoan02
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,155 |
I'll get back to this when I have some time to explain my opinion.
|
|
|
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered
[Re: cdoan02]
#4686698
10/24/13 04:35 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,155
cdoan02
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,155 |
Alright! Time to address the picture of Black Panthers openly carrying firearms, and my stated opinion that this is the "epitome of what the 2nd amendment stands for", whatever that means...
The Black Panther Party started out as a group of black men that armed themselves to protect their fellow black citizens. Protect them from whom? From the government! Maybe we have different versions of history, but my version records a time that a predominately white police department repeatedly abused their powers to oppress the predominately black community they had sworn to protect and serve. But instead of/in addition to protecting and serving this community, the police beat, robbed, murdered members of this community. I do not make any statements regarding the personal life choices of any members of the community, or whether they were good righteous people, or evil sinful people. All I state is that the police that had sworn to protect and serve this community instead/also abused this community.
In response to the abuses being incurred upon them, they armed themselves and threatened deadly force to anyone that would come to abuse them. I believe that nobody should have to deal with being physically harmed, and that everyone has a right to protect themselves. By arming themselves, they were able to defend themselves against those that meant them harm. Pure.
But you mention those that abused the carrying of weapons? Those that would instead use their weapons to do the same things they were trying to stop?
Here is how I will explain it to you:
There are cops that would use weapons irresponsibly. Threaten with their weapon when they should not; intimidate people with their weapon for immoral purposes. Fire into crowds, at non-threatening innocents, or on purpose at those they wish to harm. This does not make me say "TAKE THE GUNS AWAY FROM ALL COPS" It makes me say lock up the piece of [censored] cops that do something to harm, or threaten to harm a fellow citizen.
There are members of the Black Panthers that would use weapons irresponsibly. Threaten with their weapon when they should not; intimidate people with their weapon for immoral purposes. Fire into crowds, at non-threatening innocents, or on purpose at those they wish to harm. This does not make me say "TAKE THE GUNS AWAY FROM ALL BLACK PANTHERS!!!!" It makes me say lock up the piece of [censored] Black Panthers that do something to harm, or threaten to harm a fellow citizen.
|
|
|
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered
[Re: Concho]
#4804161
12/04/13 02:40 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 32
Cellis1981
Light Foot
|
Light Foot
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 32 |
Here's something to think about... You've got a nut job thinking of going into a Starbucks and blowing away a dozen or more people. On his way into said Starbucks he sees a "2nd ammendment touting nutjob" with an AR strapped to his back... And he walks away... You'll never hear that story on the news.
We don't have a prayer at keeping our rights if we keep fighting each other. What is the point of having the right to bear arms if we don't exercise it? The only people bitching about this being "thrown in their face" are the ones who would rather us not have those rights. The ones who forget what this country would be like if we didn't have those rights.
"You may all go to hell, I'll go to Texas."
|
|
|
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered
[Re: Cellis1981]
#4804214
12/04/13 02:54 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 26,430
Concho
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 26,430 |
Here's something to think about... You've got a nut job thinking of going into a Starbucks and blowing away a dozen or more people. On his way into said Starbucks he sees a "2nd ammendment touting nutjob" with an AR strapped to his back... And he walks away... You'll never hear that story on the news.
We don't have a prayer at keeping our rights if we keep fighting each other. What is the point of having the right to bear arms if we don't exercise it? The only people bitching about this being "thrown in their face" are the ones who would rather us not have those rights. The ones who forget what this country would be like if we didn't have those rights. I believe that you are totally wrong, I know you are when it comes to what I know and believe. I don't need some open carry guy standing up for my rights, I will speak for myself. These open carry folks are looking for their 15 minutes on the web, nothing more......you can promote their actions anyway you want, it is still over the top. As for your idea that some "Nut Job' would be scared off my an open carry guy......goofy, he would probably just steal the guy's unloaded AR and go use it in his crime.
|
|
|
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered
[Re: dogcatcher]
#4804828
12/04/13 11:58 AM
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,058
HWY_MAN
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,058 |
Was listening to the Lynn Woolley on the radio when CJ Grishim called in, now he filing suit against the WPD for the mental anguish and trauma they caused his son. He lost his first case, his next ones not looking good so now he's putting his son in the spotlight. I've never seen a man more starved for attention, he's embarrassing.
Yes! A Weatherby does kill them deader.
|
|
|
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered
[Re: robbf213]
#4804835
12/04/13 12:08 PM
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,058
HWY_MAN
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,058 |
The company's stance came about from events elsewhere. Starbucks stated in an article that "some anti-gun activists have also played a role in ratcheting up the rhetoric and friction." But thats right, its only the open carrier's fault. I haven't seen one of these local long gun open carry rallies even mention starbucks. Have you? Costco did the same thing a few years ago after a chl holder was shot by leo in one of their parking lots. All chl holders should be tarred and feathered!!! Jared's jewelry, CVS, and Chuck E Cheese also doen't want guns in their stores either. Is that due to open carry too? Honestly, all this hullabaloo tells me that the anti-gun propaganda machine did its job very well.
In other news. Starbucks extended a no smoking zone of 25'. Smokers should be tarred and feathered! I doubt seriously anti-gun groups have done more than the Yoyo's like this to push this new stance. We're I an officer and walked into that place and seen that, Mr. Bonehead would have been at gun point, Mr. Bonehead would have been on the ground, Mr. Bonehead would have been cuffed and Mr. Bonehead would have went to jail.
Yes! A Weatherby does kill them deader.
|
|
|
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered
[Re: HWY_MAN]
#4816888
12/08/13 01:45 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,440
TFF Caribou
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,440 |
The company's stance came about from events elsewhere. Starbucks stated in an article that "some anti-gun activists have also played a role in ratcheting up the rhetoric and friction." But thats right, its only the open carrier's fault. I haven't seen one of these local long gun open carry rallies even mention starbucks. Have you? Costco did the same thing a few years ago after a chl holder was shot by leo in one of their parking lots. All chl holders should be tarred and feathered!!! Jared's jewelry, CVS, and Chuck E Cheese also doen't want guns in their stores either. Is that due to open carry too? Honestly, all this hullabaloo tells me that the anti-gun propaganda machine did its job very well.
In other news. Starbucks extended a no smoking zone of 25'. Smokers should be tarred and feathered! I doubt seriously anti-gun groups have done more than the Yoyo's like this to push this new stance. We're I an officer and walked into that place and seen that, Mr. Bonehead would have been at gun point, Mr. Bonehead would have been on the ground, Mr. Bonehead would have been cuffed and Mr. Bonehead would have went to jail. On what charge? I'm starting to dislike the Long gun open carriers as well. The press is bad, and those who listen to the press flock to the polls. But until the law is changed, I don't believe he is breaking any law.
The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference. -George Washington
|
|
|
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered
[Re: TFF Caribou]
#4817782
12/08/13 02:20 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,348
SirDuke
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,348 |
Smiling, he doesn't like when people smile. Gives him the willys. Makes him suspicious.
|
|
|
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered
[Re: TFF Caribou]
#4817890
12/08/13 03:12 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 11,996
Simple Searcher
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 11,996 |
I do not doubt that he is a Bonehead, but I am with Savage 250, on what charge?
|
|
|
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered
[Re: Simple Searcher]
#4818256
12/08/13 06:03 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 636
Wool E. Booger
Tracker
|
Tracker
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 636 |
X'3.....on what charge? I despise the open carry boneheads myself, but then again, I despise a lot of groups. Doesn't mean they should be on the ground and go to jail just because I despise them. Just my
|
|
|
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered
[Re: TFF Caribou]
#4818363
12/08/13 06:32 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,213
Friction
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,213 |
The company's stance came about from events elsewhere. Starbucks stated in an article that "some anti-gun activists have also played a role in ratcheting up the rhetoric and friction." But thats right, its only the open carrier's fault. I haven't seen one of these local long gun open carry rallies even mention starbucks. Have you? Costco did the same thing a few years ago after a chl holder was shot by leo in one of their parking lots. All chl holders should be tarred and feathered!!! Jared's jewelry, CVS, and Chuck E Cheese also doen't want guns in their stores either. Is that due to open carry too? Honestly, all this hullabaloo tells me that the anti-gun propaganda machine did its job very well.
In other news. Starbucks extended a no smoking zone of 25'. Smokers should be tarred and feathered! I doubt seriously anti-gun groups have done more than the Yoyo's like this to push this new stance. We're I an officer and walked into that place and seen that, Mr. Bonehead would have been at gun point, Mr. Bonehead would have been on the ground, Mr. Bonehead would have been cuffed and Mr. Bonehead would have went to jail. On what charge? I'm starting to dislike the Long gun open carriers as well. The press is bad, and those who listen to the press flock to the polls. But until the law is changed, I don't believe he is breaking any law. inquiring minds want to know
|
|
|
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered
[Re: HWY_MAN]
#4818600
12/08/13 08:14 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 595
webb1974
Tracker
|
Tracker
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 595 |
The company's stance came about from events elsewhere. Starbucks stated in an article that "some anti-gun activists have also played a role in ratcheting up the rhetoric and friction." But thats right, its only the open carrier's fault. I haven't seen one of these local long gun open carry rallies even mention starbucks. Have you? Costco did the same thing a few years ago after a chl holder was shot by leo in one of their parking lots. All chl holders should be tarred and feathered!!! Jared's jewelry, CVS, and Chuck E Cheese also doen't want guns in their stores either. Is that due to open carry too? Honestly, all this hullabaloo tells me that the anti-gun propaganda machine did its job very well.
In other news. Starbucks extended a no smoking zone of 25'. Smokers should be tarred and feathered! I doubt seriously anti-gun groups have done more than the Yoyo's like this to push this new stance. We're I an officer and walked into that place and seen that, Mr. Bonehead would have been at gun point, Mr. Bonehead would have been on the ground, Mr. Bonehead would have been cuffed and Mr. Bonehead would have went to jail. Whatever side of the fence someone is on statements like this have to bother you. I dont know Hwyman and not saying he is or was in law enforcement but its scary to think there are law enforcers with this mentality.
|
|
|
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered
[Re: webb1974]
#4821200
12/09/13 05:37 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,105
Beretta
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,105 |
The company's stance came about from events elsewhere. Starbucks stated in an article that "some anti-gun activists have also played a role in ratcheting up the rhetoric and friction." But thats right, its only the open carrier's fault. I haven't seen one of these local long gun open carry rallies even mention starbucks. Have you? Costco did the same thing a few years ago after a chl holder was shot by leo in one of their parking lots. All chl holders should be tarred and feathered!!! Jared's jewelry, CVS, and Chuck E Cheese also doen't want guns in their stores either. Is that due to open carry too? Honestly, all this hullabaloo tells me that the anti-gun propaganda machine did its job very well. Y In other news. Starbucks extended a no smoking zone of 25'. Smokers should be tarred and feathered! I doubt seriously anti-gun groups have done more than the Yoyo's like this to push this new stance. We're I an officer and walked into that place and seen that, Mr. Bonehead would have been at gun point, Mr. Bonehead would have been on the ground, Mr. Bonehead would have been cuffed and Mr. Bonehead would have went to jail. Whatever side of the fence someone is on statements like this have to bother you. I dont know Hwyman and not saying he is or was in law enforcement but its scary to think there are law enforcers with this mentality. Bingo, I am also waiting to hear what bogus charge hwyman would be hauling this guy to jail for.
Two kinds of people vote democrat. Rich people that don't have to work, and poor people who don't want to work.
|
|
|
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered
[Re: Beretta]
#4821293
12/09/13 06:01 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,155
cdoan02
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,155 |
Ummm... The answer is pretty obvious. See: CJ Grisham.
An officer can go up to a law abiding citizen, instigate a confrontation, then arrest the "suspect" on any number of charges related to the confrontation. Resisting arrest, interference with a public official, etc.
Unfortunately, HWYMAN has already proven LEOs have the ability to do so.
It's certainly changed my perception. Police are elite, we are simple subjects. Laws mean nothing: the POLICE are the LAW.
|
|
|
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered
[Re: Beretta]
#4821419
12/09/13 06:28 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,213
Friction
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,213 |
I doubt seriously anti-gun groups have done more than the Yoyo's like this to push this new stance. We're I an officer and walked into that place and seen that, Mr. Bonehead would have been at gun point, Mr. Bonehead would have been on the ground, Mr. Bonehead would have been cuffed and Mr. Bonehead would have went to jail. Whatever side of the fence someone is on statements like this have to bother you. I dont know Hwyman and not saying he is or was in law enforcement but its scary to think there are law enforcers with this mentality. Bingo, I am also waiting to hear what bogus charge hwyman would be hauling this guy to jail for. free bump for hwyman
Last edited by Trek; 12/09/13 06:29 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered
[Re: cdoan02]
#4821583
12/09/13 07:07 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,087
Jasb
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,087 |
Ummm... The answer is pretty obvious. See: CJ Grisham.
An officer can go up to a law abiding citizen, instigate a confrontation, then arrest the "suspect" on any number of charges related to the confrontation. Resisting arrest, interference with a public official, etc.
Unfortunately, HWYMAN has already proven LEOs have the ability to do so.
It's certainly changed my perception. Police are elite, we are simple subjects. Laws mean nothing: the POLICE are the LAW. You're a mess
|
|
|
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered
[Re: Jasb]
#4821636
12/09/13 07:17 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 92
min1kay2
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 92 |
Oh, Barney Fife! Where are you?
|
|
|
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered
[Re: Jasb]
#4821674
12/09/13 07:27 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,155
cdoan02
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,155 |
Ummm... The answer is pretty obvious. See: CJ Grisham.
An officer can go up to a law abiding citizen, instigate a confrontation, then arrest the "suspect" on any number of charges related to the confrontation. Resisting arrest, interference with a public official, etc.
Unfortunately, HWYMAN has already proven LEOs have the ability to do so.
It's certainly changed my perception. Police are elite, we are simple subjects. Laws mean nothing: the POLICE are the LAW. You're a mess What makes me a mess? It's been clearly proven to me that an officer has the power to approach a law-abiding citizen that is not suspected of any crime, and, without making any verbal request or command, take a personal item off of said citizen. If citizen makes any natural human movement of resistance reaction, the officer can point a handgun at the citizen's head, handcuff, and arrest said citizen. Citizen can be charged, tried, and convicted. It's clearly been proven. Just happened. Seems to me that the police state of our society is a mess, and I'm of clear mind and body. It is entirely possible that I am messed up, and New York has it right. Either way, I ain't open carrying a long gun anywhere other than out on private land.
|
|
|
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered
[Re: robbf213]
#4821681
12/09/13 07:29 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,801
lharrell79
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,801 |
I doubt seriously anti-gun groups have done more than the Yoyo's like this to push this new stance. Is this guy hunting pastries? Why does he have the shotgun in the ready position?
|
|
|
Re: Civilians Who Carry Long Guns In Public Should Be Tarred And Feathered
[Re: lharrell79]
#4821724
12/09/13 07:41 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,105
Beretta
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,105 |
I doubt seriously anti-gun groups have done more than the Yoyo's like this to push this new stance. Is this guy hunting pastries? Why does he have the shotgun in the ready position? He is guessing the pastries from the cops, we all know how they tear up a pastry shop. And why does it matter how he is carrying it?
Two kinds of people vote democrat. Rich people that don't have to work, and poor people who don't want to work.
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, hetman, jeh7mmmag, JustWingem, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, rifleman, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, txcornhusker
|