texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
RDVTX, mattsm55, TM Hunter, Baz55, hlc
72098 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,804
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,544
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 44,055
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics538,622
Posts9,739,203
Members87,098
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
243 vs 22-250 #4688901 10/25/13 12:29 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,069
R
Reality Outdoors Offline OP
Pro Tracker
OP Offline
Pro Tracker
R
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,069
I'm sure this has already been discussed
Getting ready to get another calling rifle for coyotes and am been debating on these two rounds
I shoot a 22-250 now and have for some time
What is the good and bad from either
With the smaller bullets being made for the 243 are they as accurate


Eddie
Reality Outdoors
www.realityoutdoors.com

Re: 243 vs 22-250 [Re: Reality Outdoors] #4689099 10/25/13 01:41 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,613
BOBO the Clown Offline
kind of a big deal
Offline
kind of a big deal
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,613
I've had really good luck with the 80gr ttsx in the 243.

Ttsx excels in tbe hot smaller calibers 22-250, 220swift, 243, 6mm etc. IMO


Donate to TX Youth hunting program.... better to donate then to waste it in taxes

https://secure.qgiv.com/for/gtgoh/mobile
Re: 243 vs 22-250 [Re: BOBO the Clown] #4689115 10/25/13 01:45 AM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,394
C
Chuck McDonald Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
C
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,394
My 22-250 won't sling a TTSX worth a crud, now a 53 gr TSX it really likes.

Re: 243 vs 22-250 [Re: Chuck McDonald] #4689157 10/25/13 02:00 AM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,453
A
aggiehunter03 Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
A
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,453
When I was breaking in my 243 I used some hornady 58 grain Vmax bc a Rem 700 I had wouldn't shoot them at all. My Abolt put 10 consecutive shots inside a one inch square. Thought about loading some 87 grain Vmax for it but its too pretty for a varmint gun.

Re: 243 vs 22-250 [Re: Reality Outdoors] #4689563 10/25/13 04:36 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,229
J.G. Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,229
Stock rifle vs. Stock rifle the twist rates determine what they'll shoot.

A stock 22-250 will send a 55 gr Sierra Game King at 3780 fps. That's pretty salty to 300 yards, 400 if you're good at judging wind, 500 if you shoot too much, like I do.

A stock 243 will push a 90 gr to 100 gr bullet well north of 2850 fps. The 243 I worked up a load for was a friend's rifle. I got it to hold .3 MOA and banged the steel to 700 yards with it.

I'd go with the 243 in factory rifles. But my custom barreled, 22-250 1:8" twist, and 75 gr A-maxes is bad medicine for varmints.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: 243 vs 22-250 [Re: J.G.] #4689616 10/25/13 06:10 AM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,753
Nathan Nelson Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,753
I like both the 243 and 22-250. The 243 has a larger range of bullets and have some that give fantastic BC.

I shoot 62 Gr Swift Scirocco Bullets when I reload or 62 Gr Federal Fusion in my 22-250.

I shoot 95 Gr Combined Technology Ballistic Tips when I reload and have had great success with it, I have also reloaded some Berger Bullets with good success. My Ruger will shoot just about anything it is not picky, my H&R likes the Winchester 95 Gr Ballistic Tips which is the Combined Tech bullets, and my TC like Federal Fusion 95 Gr or Winchester Power Point 100gr.

As far as results on coyotes either kill them out further than I can shoot.

Bigger game you are better served with a 243 but lots of stuff has been killed in Texas with the 22-250. Now if you ever hunt in other states the 243 is the minimum in most states.

Re: 243 vs 22-250 [Re: Reality Outdoors] #4689691 10/25/13 10:49 AM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,058
HWY_MAN Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,058
Originally Posted By: Reality Outdoors
I'm sure this has already been discussed
Getting ready to get another calling rifle for coyotes and am been debating on these two rounds
I shoot a 22-250 now and have for some time
What is the good and bad from either
With the smaller bullets being made for the 243 are they as accurate


I've run full circle with varmint rifles and I'm back to the 243. The 1-12 barrel on my Styer loves the little fast movers.


Yes! A Weatherby does kill them deader.
Re: 243 vs 22-250 [Re: HWY_MAN] #4690922 10/25/13 07:09 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 447
S
Strongbad Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
S
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 447
I've got multiple 22 cals, and 6mm/243 variants. My last 22-250 was rebarreled into a 6mm. That said, I just like the 22-250. It's just a fun little round. Now that I've had mine rebarreled, I find myself wanting another one. Next time around though, I want a faster twist. The stock 1:14 on most rifles just doesn't do it justice. It can still perform very well, with the 1:14 and 52's (or similar) and that makes it ideal for varmints, but I'd like to have the advantage of shrinking the groups at longer distances by running bullets with better BC's. Not sure if that was what you were looking to hear, but thought I'd give some feedback.

Re: 243 vs 22-250 [Re: Strongbad] #4690979 10/25/13 07:36 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,592
R
redchevy Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
R
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,592
It would be a hard choice for me between a fast twist 22-250 and a 243. Being that the 22-250 would cost me more I would likely go the 243 rout. If its between a standard twist 22-250 and 243 then ill take the 243 every time.


It's hell eatin em live
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3