texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Buff65, TrophyHtr316, Pete's, DeVoBrown, JBRYANT 82
72089 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,802
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,537
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 44,011
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics538,402
Posts9,736,717
Members87,089
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Any saw this? #4279486 05/26/13 02:11 AM
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,404
panther89 Offline OP
Pro Tracker
OP Offline
Pro Tracker
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,404
Over the weekend, we came four votes away from the United States Senate giving our Constitutional rights over to the United Nations. In a 53-46 vote, the senate narrowly passed a measure that will stop the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty. The Statement of Purpose from the bill read: To uphold Second Amendment rights and prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty. The U.N. Small Arms Treaty, which has been championed by the Obama Administration, would have effectively placed a global ban on the import and export of small firearms. The ban would have affected all private gun owners in the U.S., and had language that would have implemented an international gun registry on all private guns and ammo. Astonishingly, 46 of our United States Senators were willing to give away our Constitutional rights to a foreign power. Here are the 46 senators that voted to give your rights to the U.N. Baldwin (D-WI) Baucus (D-MT) Bennet (D-CO) Blumenthal (D-CT) Boxer (D-CA) Brown (D-OH) Cantwell (D-WA) Cardin (D-MD) Carper (D-DE) Casey (D-PA) Coons (D-DE) Cowan (D-MA) Durbin (D-IL) Feinstein (D-CA) Franken (D-MN) Gillibrand (D-NY) Harkin (D-IA) Hirono (D-HI) Johnson (D-SD) Kaine (D-VA) King (I-ME) Klobuchar (D-MN) Landrieu (D-LA) Leahy (D-VT) Levin (D-MI) McCaskill (D-MO) Menendez (D-NJ) Merkley (D-OR) Mikulski (D-MD) Murphy (D-CT) Murray (D-WA) Nelson (D-FL) Reed (D-RI) Reid (D-NV) Rockefeller (D-WV) Sanders (I-VT) Schatz (D-HI) Schumer (D-NY) Shaheen (D-NH) Stabenow (D-MI) Udall (D-CO) Udall (D-NM) Warner (D-VA) Warren (D-MA) Whitehouse (D-RI) Wyden (D-OR) People this needs to go viral. These Senators voted to let the UN take our guns. They need to lose the election. We have been betrayed. 46 Senators Voted to Give your 2nd Amendment Constitutional Rights to the U.N. Pass this on to ALL of your contacts far and wide!!! These people need to be Immediately removed from office as soon as possible!!!!!! Tarring and feathering would also be nice!!!



Re: Any saw this? [Re: panther89] #4279777 05/26/13 06:19 AM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,116
T
target1911 Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
T
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,116
Link?


"A good life is never too short"
My Dad
Re: Any saw this? [Re: target1911] #4280090 05/26/13 03:36 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 787
T
txhippo Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
T
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 787

http://commonsensecampaign.org/site/inde...rms-treaty.html

I found this one the date is April 12 2013


BEANS AND BULLETS
Re: Any saw this? [Re: txhippo] #4280165 05/26/13 04:31 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 110,802
dogcatcher Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 110,802
It is true and it happened in March.


Combat Infantryman, the ultimate hunter where the prey shoots back.
_____________"Illegitimus non carborundum est"_______________

[Linked Image]
Re: Any saw this? [Re: panther89] #4280921 05/27/13 01:20 AM
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 520
E
edwardd Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
E
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 520
Originally Posted By: panther89
Over the weekend, we came four votes away from the United States Senate giving our Constitutional rights over to the United Nations. In a 53-46 vote, the senate narrowly passed a measure that will stop the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.


Not entirely. It's just posturing with a cushy title and get their constituents of both parties to believe they're doing something.

It's an ammendment attached to a fiscal budget, "Latest Title: An original concurrent resolution setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2014, revising the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal year 2013, and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2015 through 2023. "

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:SP139:

For the full text:

Quote:
SEC. 3__. DEFICIT-NEUTRAL RESERVE FUND TO UPHOLD SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS AND PREVENT THE UNITED STATES FROM ENTERING INTO THE UNITED NATIONS ARMS TRADE TREATY.

The Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the Senate may revise the allocations of a committee or committees, aggregates, and other appropriate levels in this resolution for one or more bills, joint resolutions, amendments, motions, or conference reports that relate to upholding Second Amendment rights, which shall include preventing the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty, by the amounts provided in such legislation for those purposes, provided that such legislation would not increase the deficit or revenues over either the period of the total of fiscal years 2013 through 2018 or the period of the total of fiscal years 2013 through 2023.


Here's a list of all the ammendments to the fiscal plan, including everything related and unrelated to fiscal policy...

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/L?d113:./temp/~bdaHSkY:1[1-573]%28Amendments_For_S.CON.RES.8%29&./temp/~bdjuBL

And the full fiscal budget plan didn't pass:

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:SC00008:

"Latest Action: 4/15/2013 Message on Senate action sent to the House."

Most I've used my poli sci degree as a network technician since graduating in 2008. w00t.

In short, if you read through all of the ammendments on fiscal planning, you can see what the senate is actually up to for both sides. Jacking off with all of their free time and doing diddly squat to actually resolve any problems or do any work.

Re: Any saw this? [Re: edwardd] #4282421 05/28/13 12:44 AM
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 7
D
dieselpwr Offline
Green Horn
Offline
Green Horn
D
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 7
those politician's addresses should be publicized for a little "come to jesus" meeting with the people who they choose to take the rights away from.
"a big tall tree and a short piece of rope"

Re: Any saw this? [Re: dieselpwr] #4283720 05/28/13 06:29 PM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 140
A
AkihiroKytori Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
A
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 140
@dieselpwr, I wouldn't go so far as that, but they should be held accountable.
@panther89, it is not surprising that they would do something like that considering they lost their best chance to take our gun rights away until they can take the house and senate all at once.

All in all I am unsurprised they threw this rider on the budget, they do things like this all the time. It seems to be a common practice to get what they want.


The measure of a man is not only what he does when people are watching, but what he does when no one is.
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3