Forums46
Topics539,450
Posts9,749,798
Members87,163
|
Most Online25,604 Feb 12th, 2024
|
|
|
Shooting downward angles
#3364180
07/10/12 09:26 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,236
wall8053
OP
Pro Tracker
|
OP
Pro Tracker
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,236 |
Most of my deer hunting has been in setups where my blind/feeders are at relatively level ground. And my rifles are zeroed and I trust the shots I take and I'm very confident they will hit where I place the crosshairs. However, this past season I hunted out of a blind that was 25 feet in the air and the feeders sat approximately 10-15 feet lower than the base of the blind, one feeder is 125 yards and second is 75 yards. Two shots, two kills BUT neither of the two shots hit where I was aiming, one hit high shoulder and the deer was DRT, no complaints on that one, and the second deer hit low which required a follow up shot. Also shot two hogs from the same setup, hog 1 shot taken at the further feeder (125yds)was hit right where I was aiming and hog 2 was at a closer feeder approx 75 yards and was a direct head shot where I was aiming. Shots on the deer were approximately 125 yards, if I'm zero'ed at 100 and can repeatedly hit the bullseye, why did my point of impact change so much with the elevation change and where should I hold for these types of shots? I had a stable rest and was shooting a 150 grain Rem Core lokt .270 so recoil isn't the issue. Would like any feedback as I don't like the inconsistencies I got from the shots. Thx for any help.
|
|
|
Re: Shooting downward angles
[Re: wall8053]
#3364221
07/10/12 09:39 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 35,904
txshntr
T-Rex Arms
|
T-Rex Arms
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 35,904 |
POI should not change with the measurements you provided. I would venture an educated guess that there is another factor effecting the shot placement and the elevation does not have anything to do with it.
If you don't think so, take a target out to the stand and shoot.
A 40' elevation change at 125 yards only amounts to about a 2' difference in measured distance and horizontal distance.
|
|
|
Re: Shooting downward angles
[Re: txshntr]
#3364235
07/10/12 09:44 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,236
wall8053
OP
Pro Tracker
|
OP
Pro Tracker
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,236 |
Thats what gets me, I know it shouldn't have made a difference given the ranges. Maybe it was a case of deer fever as the shots on the hogs were right on. Guess I need to throw a target out there and see how it goes.
|
|
|
Re: Shooting downward angles
[Re: wall8053]
#3364295
07/10/12 10:07 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 35,904
txshntr
T-Rex Arms
|
T-Rex Arms
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 35,904 |
Let us know how it goes. Very easily could have been deer fever
|
|
|
Re: Shooting downward angles
[Re: txshntr]
#3364307
07/10/12 10:09 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 60,296
stxranchman
Obie Juan Kenobi
|
Obie Juan Kenobi
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 60,296 |
Let us know how it goes. Very easily could have been deer fever Or hog fever and pulled the shot on them to make it look better.
Are idiots multiplying faster than normal people?
|
|
|
Re: Shooting downward angles
[Re: stxranchman]
#3364471
07/10/12 11:06 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 10,667
DQ Kid
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 10,667 |
I agree with what TxHntr said, should not have made a difference at those distances or that height.
|
|
|
Re: Shooting downward angles
[Re: DQ Kid]
#3364504
07/10/12 11:18 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,588
kmon11
junior
|
junior
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,588 |
I agree with what TxHntr said, should not have made a difference at those distances or that height. Yup, What they said. Must have been something else made the POI change.
lf the saying "Liar, Liar your pants on fire" were true Mainstream news might be fun to watch
|
|
|
Re: Shooting downward angles
[Re: kmon11]
#3380459
07/16/12 01:30 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 139
Craig
Woodsman
|
Woodsman
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 139 |
setup a target and take a shot. put your hunting coat on if you can bear it. might be your position.
|
|
|
Re: Shooting downward angles
[Re: Craig]
#3393632
07/20/12 03:23 AM
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,016
SingleShot85
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,016 |
150 grain Rem Core lokt here's your answer, that ammo sucks but as a general rule up or down hill you aim low, but as again the 125 would make a difference but the 75 and closer would start to make a little distance the closer to the stand you get.
Last edited by SingleShot85; 07/20/12 03:34 AM.
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, hetman, jeh7mmmag, JustWingem, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, rifleman, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, TreeBass, txcornhusker
|