texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Kevkittrell, Dgetgood, tknow1776, JoMann, MOHUNT
72082 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,800
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,535
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,993
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics538,346
Posts9,736,085
Members87,082
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
cartridges that failed from the get-go #287527 01/02/08 05:06 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 32,005
T
txtrophy85 Online Content OP
THF Celebrity
OP Online Content
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 32,005
help me name some cartridges that failed from the start.

i've got:

6mm remington
.260 remington
all the ultra-mags and SAUM's
.280 remington
7mmwsm

what are some others that were given alot of hype at the start, then fizzled out and died



For it is not the quarry that we truly seek, but the adventure.
Re: cartridges that failed from the get-go [Re: txtrophy85] #287528 01/02/08 05:48 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,049
B
bayourat Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,049
I've seen alot of 6MM and 280's down thru the years. I had a 257 STW built when it was supposed to be the next big thing. It never made it past the wildcat stage. Never loaded commercially and never offered as a factory chambering. 22 Hi-power would rank right up at the type of the dead and gones though.


Re: cartridges that failed from the get-go [Re: txtrophy85] #287529 01/02/08 05:54 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 10,309
P
PrimitiveHunter Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
P
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 10,309
Oddly enough, two of those calibers are right at the top of the classified list now.



Practice doesn’t make perfect.
Practice makes permanent.
Re: cartridges that failed from the get-go [Re: bayourat] #287530 01/02/08 06:04 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,882
C
CTK3 Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
C
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,882
25-20 win, 25-35 win, 300 savage, 244 hh mag, 303 savage, this could be a long thread.


Last edited by cliffy; 01/02/08 06:07 PM.
Re: cartridges that failed from the get-go [Re: bayourat] #287531 01/02/08 06:09 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 16,474
Crazyhorse Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 16,474
The 22 high power actually was popular at one time, but that was during that period of time when black powder was giving way to smokeless and shooters and the factories were just learning what could be done with smokeless powder and modern steels and rifle actions.

The thing is, some cartridges that have failed to become widely popular, they do have a following among certain folks.

The 358 calibers, while being some excellent cartridges, are just not that popular among the run of the mill shooter/hunter. Part of this has to do with bullet selection.

The metric calibers have never sold well in the U.S.. The exception is the 7mm Rem Mag, and yes, it's popularity is waning.

I had a 7mm Rem Mag and liked it a lot.

Killed several deer, a few coyotes and feral hogs and a couple of antelope with it.

I didn't like it as much as I do my 300 Weatherby or 35 Whelen or 375 H&H.

I have stated this on here before, but the outfitter I hunt elk with in Colorado, has commented several times that he has seen more elk shot and lost with 7mm Rem Mags, than any other cartridge.

Lack of sales can kill a cartridge to the point where brass is no longer available, even though there is a following.

The 260 rem is an example of an idea that just wasn't what it should have been. JMO.


Re: cartridges that failed from the get-go [Re: Crazyhorse] #287532 01/02/08 06:17 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 116
C
crosscuthunter Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
C
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 116
I WILL TAKE ALL 280'S OFF ANYONES HANDS IF THEY THINK THERE DEAD


Re: cartridges that failed from the get-go [Re: crosscuthunter] #287533 01/02/08 06:28 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,882
C
CTK3 Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
C
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,882
300 wbys, 35 whelin, 375 hh.....crazyhorse, i do believe i like your taste in firearms.


Re: cartridges that failed from the get-go [Re: CTK3] #287534 01/02/08 06:36 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 718
C
chestnut Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
C
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 718
No way was the .280 Remington/7mm Rem Express dead from the get go! It still has a fan following.

If you look at the "Help me add to this list of cartridges" thread, I'd say MOST of those were dead, if not from the get-go, at least within 5 years. The WSM line seems to be the exception. Perhaps the .416 Remington will also make it.


Re: cartridges that failed from the get-go [Re: CTK3] #287535 01/02/08 10:31 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 32,005
T
txtrophy85 Online Content OP
THF Celebrity
OP Online Content
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 32,005
Quote:

25-20 win, 25-35 win, 300 savage, 244 hh mag, 303 savage, this could be a long thread.




good lord man, i meant dead calibers, not mummified ones!

actually, the .300 savage was quite popular at one time, especially in the model 99 lever action.

i forgot one other caliber.....the .284 winchester



For it is not the quarry that we truly seek, but the adventure.
Re: cartridges that failed from the get-go [Re: txtrophy85] #287536 01/02/08 11:15 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 35,150
B
Brother in-law Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
B
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 35,150
.17 mach2
25wssm
243wssm
7mmwsm
264 win mag?
325wsm
rem. saum's
7mm ultra mag
I would not mind having a couple of these though


Re: cartridges that failed from the get-go [Re: CTK3] #287537 01/02/08 11:23 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 718
C
chestnut Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
C
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 718
Quote:

25-20 win, 25-35 win, 300 savage, 244 hh mag, 303 savage, this could be a long thread.




I don't think any of those qualify as dead from the get-go -- in fact some are still alive! Sure, they've been obsolete for a long time, but they were popular for quite a while after introduction.


Re: cartridges that failed from the get-go [Re: Brother in-law] #287538 01/02/08 11:25 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 32,005
T
txtrophy85 Online Content OP
THF Celebrity
OP Online Content
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 32,005
.264 did't fail, it, like the .220 swift, got alot of bad press about burning up barrels. its a great open range cartridge.

all the rest you mentioned however, failed like robert downey jr.'s drug test



For it is not the quarry that we truly seek, but the adventure.
Re: cartridges that failed from the get-go [Re: txtrophy85] #287539 01/02/08 11:32 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 35,150
B
Brother in-law Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
B
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 35,150
I would buy a 264 if the bullets were easier to find, dont know crap about them other than it was here and gone


Re: cartridges that failed from the get-go [Re: Brother in-law] #287540 01/02/08 11:35 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 16,474
Crazyhorse Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 16,474
Quote:

I would buy a 264 if the bullets were easier to find,




By this, do you mean loaded ammunition or bullets for reloading/handloading???????


Re: cartridges that failed from the get-go [Re: Crazyhorse] #287541 01/02/08 11:50 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,597
H
HunterTed Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
H
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,597
I'd love to have a .264 win mag. been lookin for one for years, but never could find one when I had money in my pocket.

Quote:

help me name some cartridges that failed from the start.




22-250.........that cartridge never should have even been born.........it never had a chance.



Mathews Legacy
Mathews Ovation

Square Up Archery & Lightning Bowstrings Staff Shooter
Re: cartridges that failed from the get-go [Re: HunterTed] #287542 01/03/08 12:18 AM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 32,005
T
txtrophy85 Online Content OP
THF Celebrity
OP Online Content
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 32,005
help me understand why the .22-250 dosen't deserve to be born.....i think its remingtons second most succesful cartridge.



For it is not the quarry that we truly seek, but the adventure.
Re: cartridges that failed from the get-go [Re: HunterTed] #287543 01/03/08 12:18 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 718
C
chestnut Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
C
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 718
Huh, .22-250?!? It was very successful!

http://www.chuckhawks.com/22-250rem.htm


Re: cartridges that failed from the get-go [Re: Crazyhorse] #287544 01/03/08 12:26 AM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 35,150
B
Brother in-law Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
B
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 35,150
Quote:

Quote:

I would buy a 264 if the bullets were easier to find,




By this, do you mean loaded ammunition or bullets for reloading/handloading???????


Loaded in the box at the store. I have no desire to handload


Re: cartridges that failed from the get-go [Re: chestnut] #287545 01/03/08 12:43 AM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 36
2
2506 Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
2
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 36
I have a custom Mauser 98 in .264 that my wife gave me for Christmas last year. I only shot it to check out the group with the old 4 power Redfield on it. It shot about a 2 inch group. I just got a new 3-9 put on it and can't wait to check it out. I managed to find a friend who had 5 new boxes of shells that were from the 70's probably. I gave him $10 a box for them. The Winchester boxes were the yellow ones. It also came with 2 boxes of reloads that had October 1968 written on them. I probably won't shoot them. If I shot more, I would get some dies and reload. I also have a .220 Swift. My best shot with it was a turkey in the neck at 120 yards.


Re: cartridges that failed from the get-go [Re: 2506] #287546 01/03/08 01:04 AM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 974
R
rjd Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
R
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 974
How about the .225 Winchester, .307, 8mm Remington?


Re: cartridges that failed from the get-go [Re: Brother in-law] #287547 01/03/08 01:25 AM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 16,474
Crazyhorse Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 16,474
The You Are S.O.L.

The only way you will be able to shoot the 264 on a regular basis is to handload/reload, and don't be so quick to look down on handloading/reloading in almost 40 years of hunting, I can only account for about 2 dozen animals that I have killed with factory loads.


Re: cartridges that failed from the get-go [Re: HunterTed] #287548 01/03/08 01:58 AM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,074
W
Wild Boar Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
W
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,074

Quote:




22-250.........that cartridge never should have even been born.........it never had a chance.
Quote:







You must be mad because santa didn't bring you a 22-250 for x-mas I know it was on your list.



P.W. ARCHERY
www.boardhunts.com
Re: cartridges that failed from the get-go [Re: Wild Boar] #287549 01/03/08 02:24 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 259
firecapt186 Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 259
Man, I hope the 260 rem isn't dead. I have a new encore barrel on order. I guess it's a good thing that I hand load all my rounds.
I don't understand why this round didn't make it big. If you go to the remington site and look at the balistics of the comparable rounds, it hangs with or surpasses the best of the popular ones.


Re: cartridges that failed from the get-go [Re: firecapt186] #287550 01/03/08 02:33 AM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,882
C
CTK3 Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
C
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,882
22-250 is a great round i think. i'm currently trying to get rid of one now, just really wanting to get a varmint edition that savage offers that i have fell in love with.


Re: cartridges that failed from the get-go [Re: CTK3] #287551 01/03/08 02:38 AM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 102
J
Jim_Bob Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
J
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 102
.35 Newton



Visit my site to see some cool targets...

www.master-target.com
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3