I just got a new Tikka 223 Varmint on order. I know nothing about Tikkas so I need some knowledge please.

Do they have the same type of base and ring system that pretty much any other rifle does? Or is it like the Rugers where u can mount the rings directly to the reciever? Are bases for the varmint edition the same as the T3 bases, assuming it requires a base? Any good suggestions on a one piece base?

direct mount to a groove in the top of the reciever
similiar to Sako

I like Warne's for Tikkas

My Tikka T3 mount's to the action. There is a small lug hole where the rear ring fit's. Great rings and Super gun's !!!

If you ordered a NEW Tikka, it should come with rings. If they are the wrong size or you just don't like them ( they are aluminum), Leupold offers two piece bases.

I originally used the Tikka factory supplied rings. When I upgraded scopes I added the Burris Tactical Rail

http://swfa.com/Burris-Xtreme-Tactical-2-Piece-Base-P6133.aspx

and Burris Zee Rings.

I did this to get the scope as low as I could so I was working on Spec/dimensions of the products also.

DNZ makes a one piece I think http://swfa.com/Tikka-C2620.aspx

Talley http://swfa.com/Tikka-C2569.aspx

Warne http://swfa.com/Tikka-C2384.aspx
http://swfa.com/Warne-Maxima-Permanent-Attach-1-Rings-P9906.aspx

Lots of choices...Know which scope you are mounting yet?

I haven't decided on a scope for sure yet. Probably going with Nikon Monarch 5-20x44 or a Vortex Viper 6.5-20x50.

So it is similar to a Ruger. So is this all I would need?
http://www.opticsplanet.net/warne-30-mil...dium-rings.html

Sorry rwh, did t click on all your links.

So if I get the Warne Rings that are specific for Tikkas, then I do NOT need a base.
Someone please confirm that statement.

Tally lightweights and thank me later

It should come with stock rings. I would suggest though you pick up a picatinny rail for it.

http://www.opticsplanet.net/egw-tikka-t3-picatinny-rail-scope-mount.html

Congratulations! I have the same gun in .223 and 22-250. That stainless .223 has a picatinny rail while the 22-250 still has the stock rings. I plan to get the above rail fairly soon. The Three Finns (third is a 70's SAKO AIII). I have to find my camera so I can take some decent pictures of the rail system. These cellphone cameras are convenient but damn they take lousy pictures!

Correct, they will attach directly to the receiver.

EGW make one piece scope mounts. also comes in 20moa also
http://swfa.com/EGW-Picatinny-Rail-1-Piece-Scope-Mount-P46247.aspx

If you wanna replace your bolt handle or bolt shroud this site has parts. You can replace them yourself no smith needed.

http://www.hss.net.au/index.php?manufacturers_id=37

Talley for me also

I used these on my 308, but used the factory rings on my 270 and haven't had any problems yet.

Another vote for the Talley lightweights. One thing to be mindful of, Talley's ring heights are a little higher than most. The mediums should be plenty high for up to 50mm with plenty of barrel clearance. Good choice on your rifle.

I bet you could fit 50mm with the low rings. Seemed like 40mm had a full cm of space under it.

Well I at least got the scope ordered. I got a Nikon Monarch 6-24x50 on Amazon for $508! Couldn't pass up on such a good deal.

So I plan on using the rings that come with the gun. I am assuming that some will come with it. Otherwise I think I'll go with the Warne rings that mount directly to the receiver. I guess I would have to see it but I'm not sure why anyone would do a base and ring system if the option to mount rings directly to the receiver. The engineer in me sa cheaper and less parts is better.

I'd do some research on the factory rings. Alot of people swear them off. Once you handle them you'll feel how cheap they are. Personally, if I were in your shoes I'd go with the DNZ Reaper mount. It's one piece, built solid, and looks great.

Winner!
This is what I would suggest for the Tikka T3.
Great rifle by the way.

put a tacticool rail and tps rings on it.. and call it good..that's what i did on mine..

SAKO's grooved receiver is tapered so the rings cannot slip forward under recoil plus a cutout.

TIKKA's grooved receiver is straight cut and does have the cutout to keep from sliding forward.

I know 243 Win is not a heavy recoiling round, but I have had it both ways now in 9 years now.