texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
dtorgie, bluebiller, Time2GoHuntin, RobbiTX86, Droptine3030
72075 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,799
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,534
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,982
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics538,236
Posts9,734,666
Members87,075
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
223 vs 243 #2290853 05/05/11 05:41 AM
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 304
B
Bud1 Offline OP
Bird Dog
OP Offline
Bird Dog
B
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 304
Wanted opinions. My Brother is handicapped,but wants to go deer hunting with me this coming season. He is interested in a 223. IMO its too light for deer? I am thinking 243, but what would you suggest? He needs IMO a youth gun, d/t weight, and his lack of mobility. He can shoot, former hunter, that has taken a 180 when he was younger. This will be used mainly for does, he just wants to fill the freezer! Thanks for any help.



Born and Raised Texan / Veteran USN 86-92 / Former Duddle Bugger
Gain respect, by showing some
Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: Bud1] #2290871 05/05/11 06:07 AM
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 88
T
TSullivan Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
T
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 88
If he can hit the neck either one will do fine. When I was young and first started out hunting I probably shot half a dozen deer with a 22-250 with no problems. It's all about shot placement.


Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: TSullivan] #2290876 05/05/11 06:22 AM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,381
B
blancobuster Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
B
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,381
Originally Posted By: TSullivan
If he can hit the neck either one will do fine. When I was young and first started out hunting I probably shot half a dozen deer with a 22-250 with no problems. It's all about shot placement.


you don't even need to hit the neck, my primary gun is a .243 killed many deer and a few hogs drt without shooting them in the neck with no problem.


Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: blancobuster] #2290886 05/05/11 07:05 AM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,160
G
gbeard Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
G
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,160
Ive killed a many a deer with a .223. Never lost one and most shots where heart/lung hits. As long as you put a bullet through either the deer is going to die pretty quick. I would suggest using a 64 grn soft point(I like winchester ranger 64 grn power point) though instead of a 55.

.243 will probably give you a little more consistency (in regards to wound canal size and depth) with some of the heavier loads.


Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: gbeard] #2290887 05/05/11 07:16 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,033
M
missingAK Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
M
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,033
Dad shoots deer every year with either a 22-250 or .222. Shot placement and bullet construction are vital. out to 150-200 yds a .223 will kill em all day long.



"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing happened." Winston Churchill
Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: missingAK] #2290891 05/05/11 08:22 AM
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 304
B
Bud1 Offline OP
Bird Dog
OP Offline
Bird Dog
B
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 304
Ok, good information, I'm not real familiar with the bullet options for either round. The 64 grn soft point makes since. Any other suggestions? For both 223 and 243???
Thanks for the help, gentlemen



Born and Raised Texan / Veteran USN 86-92 / Former Duddle Bugger
Gain respect, by showing some
Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: gbeard] #2290900 05/05/11 10:31 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 9,162
1
10pointers Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
1
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 9,162
Originally Posted By: gbeard
Ive killed a many a deer with a .223. Never lost one and most shots where heart/lung hits. As long as you put a bullet through either the deer is going to die pretty quick. I would suggest using a 64 grn soft point(I like winchester ranger 64 grn power point) though instead of a 55.

.243 will probably give you a little more consistency (in regards to wound canal size and depth) with some of the heavier loads.



Agree 100% on everything. I have had the same results


Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: 10pointers] #2290973 05/05/11 12:28 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,235
J
Jase Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
J
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,235
I use a .243 as my primary deer rifle. I like the 100 grain rounds. I have used Remington Core Lokt but last year got turned on to the Hornady 100 grain BTSP.

As long as the shot placement is good, you shouldn't have to worry about them going far if they go anywhere.

I plan to take a doe this season with my .223 just to get a kill with it.



Jason
Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: Jase] #2290976 05/05/11 12:29 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,235
J
Jase Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
J
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,235
As for guns, my wife uses a youth Remington 700 in .243 and loves it. It's a great shooting, lightweight rifle.



Jason
Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: Jase] #2290981 05/05/11 12:33 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,841
T
twice70 Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
T
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,841
If a little recoil is not an issue I'd go with a 243. There are a lot of youth model 243's available, just pick one he likes and take him hunting. Good luck!!


Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: twice70] #2291022 05/05/11 12:53 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,034
T
TxYoteHunter Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
T
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,034
+1 onthe .243. I've used mine for many, many years and it's been a good one.


Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: TxYoteHunter] #2291038 05/05/11 01:03 PM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,536
0
007hunter Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
0
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,536
I own both...my son killed his first deer a few years ago with a .223 (mini-14) from 160 yards. Put her down with a chest/shoulder shot. No problem. That being said...either one would work fine, but shot placement is omportant.


Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: 007hunter] #2291083 05/05/11 01:32 PM
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 304
B
Bud1 Offline OP
Bird Dog
OP Offline
Bird Dog
B
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 304
Hey, thanks a bunch ya'll. Recoil is going to be an issue as well as weight. But you've given me some great info. The youth models could be the way to go. I'll have to look into ammo too.



Born and Raised Texan / Veteran USN 86-92 / Former Duddle Bugger
Gain respect, by showing some
Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: Bud1] #2291143 05/05/11 02:03 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 895
L
LuckenbachTexas Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
L
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 895
A 243 with Winchester Powermax HP is all you need. He can go with 223 if someone else is tracking them. The Powermax is the best deer round I've ever witnesed in 243, 30-30, and 308 win. It really knocks the taste out of their mouth.

A Ruger M77 Hawkeye Compact is the rifle for him.




Last edited by LuckenbachTexas; 05/05/11 02:06 PM.


"Love it or leave it"
Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: LuckenbachTexas] #2291165 05/05/11 02:16 PM
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,531
J
JWP58 Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
J
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,531
Cant go wrong with either!!

I own both, but have only used the .243 on deer. Everytime i've pulled the trigger, it goes bang and they fall down (100gr powerpoints)

If you use a .223, make sure to use the proper bullet...no varmint bullets. I'd suggest the Barnes TSX. One of my coworkers shot an 8 point last year at around 100yds and it preformed is advertised (expanded near double in width) and the deer was dead within 50yds.


Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: JWP58] #2291181 05/05/11 02:24 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,565
R
redchevy Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
R
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,565
Killed too many deer to count with 223 rem and 60 grain nosler partitions, knocks them dead.

I personaly would go for the 243 if it wasnt too much to handle.



It's hell eatin em live
Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: redchevy] #2291186 05/05/11 02:25 PM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 41,322
B
BMD Offline
Silver Spoon
Offline
Silver Spoon
B
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 41,322
.243 with 85gr TSX!


Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: redchevy] #2291188 05/05/11 02:25 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,901
J
JJH Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
J
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,901
+1 the 223 will certainly work, especially under controlled conditions. But IMO the 243 with 100gr deer bullets (or the 85 TSX) is the better option.


Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: JJH] #2291294 05/05/11 03:24 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,579
H
HUNTING_COACH Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
H
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,579
Personally, I think you have to look at the whole situation. Everyone says "shot placement, shot placement, shot placement". While I agree with this, I think you have to take into consideration that he will be in a wheelchair. This might not make it so easy to hit that exact spot with a .223.

I would use a .243 because it gives you a little more leeway, just in case he does not make the perfect shot with a .223. While, it wont be a lot, it is a bigger round, and weighs a little bit more. Again, not a whole lot, but it does give some leeway if that shot is a little off.

I reread your original post and you said handicapped, and I assumed that meant in a wheelchair. If I am wrong, I apologize. I am not trying to offend anyone, so if I did, again, I apologize. Just giving my opinion.

Good luck with the hunt and good luck to your brother.


Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: blancobuster] #2291314 05/05/11 03:33 PM
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 88
T
TSullivan Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
T
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 88
Originally Posted By: blancobuster
Originally Posted By: TSullivan
If he can hit the neck either one will do fine. When I was young and first started out hunting I probably shot half a dozen deer with a 22-250 with no problems. It's all about shot placement.


you don't even need to hit the neck, my primary gun is a .243 killed many deer and a few hogs drt without shooting them in the neck with no problem.


So has my 22-250? What's your point?

If he hits a vital area both rounds will knock it dead. If he doesn't hit a vital area, neither round will knock it dead. Simple as that.


Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: TSullivan] #2291325 05/05/11 03:37 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,565
R
redchevy Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
R
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,565
Originally Posted By: TSullivan
Originally Posted By: blancobuster
Originally Posted By: TSullivan
If he can hit the neck either one will do fine. When I was young and first started out hunting I probably shot half a dozen deer with a 22-250 with no problems. It's all about shot placement.


you don't even need to hit the neck, my primary gun is a .243 killed many deer and a few hogs drt without shooting them in the neck with no problem.


So has my 22-250? What's your point?

If he hits a vital area both rounds will knock it dead. If he doesn't hit a vital area, neither round will knock it dead. Simple as that.


His point is you specified a neck shot, and you dont need to shoot them in the neck up



It's hell eatin em live
Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: redchevy] #2291345 05/05/11 03:43 PM
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 88
T
TSullivan Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
T
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 88
Originally Posted By: redchevy
Originally Posted By: TSullivan
Originally Posted By: blancobuster
Originally Posted By: TSullivan
If he can hit the neck either one will do fine. When I was young and first started out hunting I probably shot half a dozen deer with a 22-250 with no problems. It's all about shot placement.


you don't even need to hit the neck, my primary gun is a .243 killed many deer and a few hogs drt without shooting them in the neck with no problem.


So has my 22-250? What's your point?

If he hits a vital area both rounds will knock it dead. If he doesn't hit a vital area, neither round will knock it dead. Simple as that.


His point is you specified a neck shot, and you dont need to shoot them in the neck up


Was anything I said wrong? I never said it was the only way nor did I say a heart shot wouldn't kill it. Just the way I would recommend.


Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: TSullivan] #2291520 05/05/11 04:39 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,565
R
redchevy Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
R
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,565
You didnt say it but it sure implys it



It's hell eatin em live
Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: TSullivan] #2291525 05/05/11 04:41 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,565
R
redchevy Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
R
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,565
If your gonna make it on here your gonna have to get used to taking a fair amound of ribbing from people weather you like them or not. Also we cant read your mind so say what you mean!

Its a fun place with lots of differeing opinions, have fun and relax! up

The overly defensive people ruin this site... and most of them wind up banned.



It's hell eatin em live
Re: 223 vs 243 [Re: TSullivan] #2291528 05/05/11 04:43 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,599
jaymz Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,599
I almost exclusively use my remington 700 in a .243 with silvertips.. A lot of people hate ballistic silvertips, but they've worked really well for me.

I haven't touched my .30-06 in 3 years I don't think.


Page 1 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3