|
Forums46
Topics538,445
Posts9,737,165
Members87,089
| |
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
|
|
|
 Barnes MRX, versus Barnes TTSX
#1855946
11/22/10 09:33 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 13,735
helomech
OP
THF Celebrity
|
|
OP
THF Celebrity
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 13,735 |
About to start loading one of these up in the 165 grain for my .30-06. Was wondering if anyone has any knowledge of which is better.
|
|
|
|
Re: Barnes MRX, versus Barnes TTSX
[Re: helomech]
#1856062
11/22/10 10:25 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,065
exoticbob
Veteran Tracker
|
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,065 |
after just using the ttsx - that is my vote! quick expansion but solid passthru. will be hard for me to use anything else at this stage.
|
|
|
|
Re: Barnes MRX, versus Barnes TTSX
[Re: exoticbob]
#1856070
11/22/10 10:28 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 13,735
helomech
OP
THF Celebrity
|
|
OP
THF Celebrity
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 13,735 |
Thanks, that is what I am leaning to, but curious of the tungsten core in the MRX.
|
|
|
|
Re: Barnes MRX, versus Barnes TTSX
[Re: exoticbob]
#1856071
11/22/10 10:29 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,580
BOBO the Clown
kind of a big deal
|
|
kind of a big deal
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,580 |
after just using the ttsx - that is my vote! quick expansion but solid passthru. will be hard for me to use anything else at this stage. I've got three boxes of the TSX 100 grain in my 257 wby...Now You really have me waiting to try the 80grain TTSX's 
|
|
|
|
Re: Barnes MRX, versus Barnes TTSX
[Re: BOBO the Clown]
#1870508
11/29/10 01:42 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 139
deerhunter721
Woodsman
|
|
Woodsman
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 139 |
the mrx might allow more room for powder since the solid copper tsx's are longer than a regular soft point.
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, hetman, jeh7mmmag, JustWingem, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, rifleman, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, TreeBass, txcornhusker
|
