|
|
Texpppr
Woodsman
Reged: 10/17/07
Posts: 242
Loc: Harlingen, Texas
|
Re: 9.3 x 62 Vs. ,375 H & H
05/05/08 09:21 PM
|
|
|
I know in the CZ's the safari magnum (.375) is a couple of pounds heavier than the 550 (9.3 x 62.. I had a 300 Weatherby magnum for awhile when I was in my early 20's.. Yes it kicked, but then it didn't have the limbsaver like you can get now either.
|
|
9.3 x 62 Vs. ,375 H & H
|
Texpppr
|
05/05/08 11:41 AM
|
Re: 9.3 x 62 Vs. ,375 H & H
|
Crazyhorse
|
05/05/08 08:52 PM
|
Re: 9.3 x 62 Vs. ,375 H & H
|
JCB
|
05/05/08 08:40 PM
|
Re: 9.3 x 62 Vs. ,375 H & H
|
Texpppr
|
05/05/08 08:48 PM
|
Re: 9.3 x 62 Vs. ,375 H & H
|
Crazyhorse
|
05/05/08 09:13 PM
|
Re: 9.3 x 62 Vs. ,375 H & H
|
Texpppr
|
05/05/08 09:21 PM
|
Re: 9.3 x 62 Vs. ,375 H & H
|
HWY_MAN
|
05/05/08 09:38 PM
|
Re: 9.3 x 62 Vs. ,375 H & H
|
Crazyhorse
|
05/05/08 10:23 PM
|
Re: 9.3 x 62 Vs. ,375 H & H
|
WileyCoyote
|
05/15/08 09:56 PM
|
Re: 9.3 x 62 Vs. ,375 H & H
|
WileyCoyote
|
05/15/08 10:03 PM
|
Re: 9.3 x 62 Vs. ,375 H & H
|
Texpppr
|
05/16/08 01:48 PM
|
Re: 9.3 x 62 Vs. ,375 H & H
|
WileyCoyote
|
05/16/08 06:20 PM
|
Re: 9.3 x 62 Vs. ,375 H & H
|
JCB
|
05/05/08 08:59 PM
|
|
4 registered and 16 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
Moderator: Big_Orn, HWY_MAN, bankrunner, BuckMaster, dgilbert, JohnWester, Guy, gr_elliott, jeh7mmmag, TreeBass, Team Hillbilly
|
Forum Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled
|
Rating:
Thread views: 670
|
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5
©2007 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide.
|