Texas Hunting Forum

Crossbreed Supertuck vs Milt Sparks Versa-Max II

Posted By: BobG

Crossbreed Supertuck vs Milt Sparks Versa-Max II - 11/18/12 10:00 PM

It's for a 4-1/4 inch 1911 (Yea, my New SIG RCS smile )

I've actually used the VM-2 for a Full Size 1911 and liked it a lot, but have yet to try out the CB-ST.

Which one would you say is more comfortable?
Which is a better fit?
Which one retains better?
I like the leather loops on the VM-2, but do the clips on the CB hols just as well when drawing the pistol??

What do you guys prefer??

Also: If it matters, I plan on Appendix-Carrying...

Thanks wink
Posted By: rifle.30cal

Re: Crossbreed Supertuck vs Milt Sparks Versa-Max II - 11/18/12 11:07 PM

My preference is for the versa max II. I have both holsters, but prefer the belt loops on the Milt Sparks and the way it retains the commander size .45 I carry. The clips on the Cross Breed are more of a pain in my opinion.

My 2 cents.
Randy
Posted By: BobG

Re: Crossbreed Supertuck vs Milt Sparks Versa-Max II - 11/19/12 03:30 PM

Anyone else?
Posted By: blancoman

Re: Crossbreed Supertuck vs Milt Sparks Versa-Max II - 11/19/12 06:31 PM

Wish I could compare but having never used the VM, I am only able to give first hand on the Crossbreed. I bought from Crossbreedseconds.com. They sell crossbreed holsters that have blemishes for less than half price. Anyway, I have worn a full size 1911 in mine every day for the last month. A very comfortable holster to work in but not so much to sit and drive for hours.
© 2024 Texas Hunting Forum