Nikon vs leupold

Ok I just bought a new rem Sendero in 300 win mag and I'm looking for a new scope. I have been looking at the monarch 4x16x42 and the Leupold vx3 4.5x14x50. So give me some advise on several issues. First which is the better quality? What reticle do you prefer? 1" or 30mm tube? Leupold or talley rings/bases? Obviously there are better scopes to be had but is there anything better for under $600-700. Thanks for the help

If you can swing it get a zeiss conquest, ive had both of those scopes mentioned and they were very good scopes, i would lean more to the vx3, but they dont compare to a zeiss

Zeiss Conquest @ www.cameralndny.com can't beat prices, no tax, Doug is a great guy and easy to deal with.

Talley one piece no question!

i have been experimenting with dnz single piece mounts and love them on my rifles, really like the talley's also. very user friendly.. i am not a big nikon fan after having an issue with one of their scopes i had just as many prblms with their customer support maybe just my luck but i will not use them again. leupolds are great no real cmplaints there, but i also like the burris ff 2 they seem to hold up well on a couple of the rigs i have.. but for overall clarity and ruggedness the bushnell elite series gets my vote.. i have a 300 wsm in a sporter weight and my bushnell elite 3200 5-15x44 holds zero like a champ, and its clarity ((in My opinion for what its worth)) is on par with or better than the leupold. they are impressive scopes and i have heard great things about their customer support..

Leupold over Nikon any day.

VORTEX Viper.........over both...

ZEISS Conquest over all three...

Out of the two, Nikon is better. Bushnell Elite's can be had for a decent price right now which puts them ahead of both. None of the three compare to Zeiss which can be had at your price range as well.

I love the argument of Nikon vs. Leupold. As stated before, it's like comparing ford to a cadillac, with Nikon being the Ford.
Now for the Zeiss, to me, they arent any better then Leupolds. Eye relief isnt any better, and the clarity is just the same as the VX3. I would also go with Leupold rings and bases, theres a reason why they are so popular. I dont care what people say, Nikon and Bushnell do not compare to Leupold.

+1
I paid 800 dollars for a Bushnell Elite 6500 and ended up taking it back and getting a $500 VX3 that I like WAY better.

Ok what reticle obj and tube?

Reticle is up to you, but I like the heavy duplex, makes low light shots very easy. 30mm tube as well

I'd pick the Nikon Monarch over the Leupold VX3. You might also look at Bushnell Elite 4200 or 6500 series that are currently on closeout since a new Elite line is coming in 2011. I have a Bushnell Elite 4200 3-9x40 that is much clearer in low light than a Nikon Monarch or Leupod VX3. Vortex is an up and coming scope company. I have a Vortex Viper PST on order. Zeiss Conquest are excellent but pricy.

Nikon is a Toyota, Bushnell Elite is an Infiniti and Conquest is your BMW 3-series. I'll give you Cadillac on Leupold as both are living on past reputation.

I have:

Leupold VX-III
Vortex Viper
Bushnell Elite 3200
Nikon Buckmaster

All are excellent scopes and accomplish the purpose for which I have them mounted very well.

Rings and bases are just like scopes. There is no "best". There are a bunch that do a great job.

Out of luck here, I like Chevy

Leupold

No more Leupold for me. sure they have ok customr service but scope failure in the field is still scope failure and I have had 3 scope failures 2 of which were Leupolds and they both died on expensive (to me) hunting trips, glad I had a backup rifle with Nikon attached.

Leupold all the way. I do have one nikon and it's a great scope, but it aint a leupold.

My thoughts exactly. I hear a lot of hype about Conquest scopes but I have never been impressed with one myself. They are Ok but certainly not great.

I'd go with the one you can afford, and I bet it'll do you a fine job.

not sure if its been said but go to one of the big box stores and look through all of them. Your eyes may see diff't than someone elses.

X2, I have Nikon have zero complaints but for my next rifle I'm going to go with a Vortex Viper

Leupold.

Nikon

Leupold

I have a stainless 300wby Sendero and I put a Leupold VariXIII 4-14x40 and I think its the perfect scope.

dont get a 50mm objective, all it does is raise the ring height and 1" tube I think is the way to go

Leupold

If it was me, I'd spend my $600 on a Meopta. I've tinkered with all brands, and IMHO its the best in that price range.

Ive got a nikon monarch 4-12x42.
Great scope. No complaints.

I'm well pleased with both on the higher end and more pleased with Nikon on the lower end.