texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
GKFire, IHNTDUX, OregonWild, RAUKUS01, Dutch_Dogs_77
72138 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,811
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,582
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 44,177
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics539,099
Posts9,745,373
Members87,138
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: ATF ruling on SBRs [Re: KRoyal] #8849512 05/09/23 07:31 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 10,025
U
unclebubba Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
U
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 10,025
Originally Posted by KRoyal
Originally Posted by TLew



(I'm not saying I don't agree with you, just that we need to get the courts to look at overturning chevron deference)


I've heard that term a lot listening to the 2A Attorneys on this case, went and looked it up still don't 100% understand it. Guess that is why I'm not a lawyer rofl I get the gist of it, but when I read legal mumbojumbo my eyes glaze over.

The way I understand it, Chevron Deference is deferring to the government agencies to interpret any parts of laws that are not specifically addressed by congress. i.e. pistol braces are not specifically addressed by congress. Chevron Deference would defer to the ATF to decide if they are part of the NFA.


http://www.boatloan.com/michael-hunt/

Originally Posted by Nolanco
current federal policy is clearly irrational, scientifically insupportable and ridiculous.
Re: ATF ruling on SBRs [Re: unclebubba] #8849528 05/09/23 08:02 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 26,282
KRoyal Online Sleepy
Texoma Legend
Online Sleepy
Texoma Legend
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 26,282
Originally Posted by unclebubba
Originally Posted by KRoyal
Originally Posted by TLew



(I'm not saying I don't agree with you, just that we need to get the courts to look at overturning chevron deference)


I've heard that term a lot listening to the 2A Attorneys on this case, went and looked it up still don't 100% understand it. Guess that is why I'm not a lawyer rofl I get the gist of it, but when I read legal mumbojumbo my eyes glaze over.

The way I understand it, Chevron Deference is deferring to the government agencies to interpret any parts of laws that are not specifically addressed by congress. i.e. pistol braces are not specifically addressed by congress. Chevron Deference would defer to the ATF to decide if they are part of the NFA.

Yea I get that, but just like in the latest EPA case where the SC stripped the EPA of its power to enact policy without Congress. It should be a pretty open and shut case. The ATF has no authority or power to do this.


[Linked Image]



Re: ATF ruling on SBRs [Re: KRoyal] #8849534 05/09/23 08:13 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 10,025
U
unclebubba Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
U
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 10,025
Originally Posted by KRoyal
Originally Posted by unclebubba
Originally Posted by KRoyal
Originally Posted by TLew



(I'm not saying I don't agree with you, just that we need to get the courts to look at overturning chevron deference)


I've heard that term a lot listening to the 2A Attorneys on this case, went and looked it up still don't 100% understand it. Guess that is why I'm not a lawyer rofl I get the gist of it, but when I read legal mumbojumbo my eyes glaze over.

The way I understand it, Chevron Deference is deferring to the government agencies to interpret any parts of laws that are not specifically addressed by congress. i.e. pistol braces are not specifically addressed by congress. Chevron Deference would defer to the ATF to decide if they are part of the NFA.

Yea I get that, but just like in the latest EPA case where the SC stripped the EPA of its power to enact policy without Congress. It should be a pretty open and shut case. The ATF has no authority or power to do this.

You're preaching to the choir, Kyle.


http://www.boatloan.com/michael-hunt/

Originally Posted by Nolanco
current federal policy is clearly irrational, scientifically insupportable and ridiculous.
Re: ATF ruling on SBRs [Re: DustyArmadillo] #8849548 05/09/23 08:30 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 26,282
KRoyal Online Sleepy
Texoma Legend
Online Sleepy
Texoma Legend
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 26,282
Oh I know. I just don't see how our elected officials and SC Justices don't see it lol.


[Linked Image]



Re: ATF ruling on SBRs [Re: KRoyal] #8849875 05/10/23 11:06 AM
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 6,113
S
soooo Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
S
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 6,113
Originally Posted by KRoyal
Oh I know. I just don't see how our elected officials and SC Justices don't see it lol.


There's no money in it.

Re: ATF ruling on SBRs [Re: soooo] #8849906 05/10/23 12:26 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 26,282
KRoyal Online Sleepy
Texoma Legend
Online Sleepy
Texoma Legend
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 26,282
Originally Posted by soooo
Originally Posted by KRoyal
Oh I know. I just don't see how our elected officials and SC Justices don't see it lol.


There's no money in it.

True, it’s always about the money. Home of the free my [censored]..


[Linked Image]



Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3