texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
victorcaoh, gtmill6619, cpen13, Huntinkid, garey
72055 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,796
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,526
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,927
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics538,024
Posts9,731,982
Members87,055
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Leupold vs Vortex vs Nikon [Re: redchevy] #5374046 10/22/14 06:53 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 35,129
B
Brother in-law Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
B
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 35,129
Originally Posted By: redchevy
I think anyone debating the clarity of a vx3, conquest, and pst is picking fly poop out of the pepper.


Speaking of the Terra compared to those

Re: Leupold vs Vortex vs Nikon [Re: Arrowslinger82] #5374170 10/22/14 07:52 PM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,394
B
booradley Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
B
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,394
The wall opposite the gun counter at the Ft. Cabela's is approximately 78 yards away. There is a good size antelope on that wall along with an eye chart. My experience has been thus: if a prospect is comparing a Nikon vs a Vortex in the same price range and glassing the wall, the vast majority pick the Vortex. When it is Nikon vs Leupold they always pick the Leupold. When comparing Leupold vs Vortex it is about 60/40 in favor of Leupold. Prospects are told that you really can't tell the true quality of the glass until you look through it in low light and very bright sunshine.

How do I know this? I don't have to answer that question.


Don’t roll those bloodshot eyes at me.
Re: Leupold vs Vortex vs Nikon [Re: Arrowslinger82] #5374198 10/22/14 08:10 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 35,129
B
Brother in-law Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
B
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 35,129
Just wondering what you consider the lighting conditions to be in Cabelas?

Re: Leupold vs Vortex vs Nikon [Re: Arrowslinger82] #5374211 10/22/14 08:16 PM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,394
B
booradley Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
B
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,394
Certainly not any hunting condition. Fluorescent lighting is not the best medium for judging optics glass.


Don’t roll those bloodshot eyes at me.
Re: Leupold vs Vortex vs Nikon [Re: Arrowslinger82] #5374306 10/22/14 09:10 PM
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 15,710
6
603Country Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
6
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 15,710
I have some Leica binocs (10x40) and have had them for years. Many times over the years when hunting at twilight, just as the light was fading out, I could see the big buck in the binocs, but couldn't find him in the scope. Once I tried counting the deer from 'the big oak tree', where the monster buck was 5th from the tree. I could see that in the binocs but not the scope, but I could count the deer. So...1,2,3,4 and Bang. Shot a doe and caught major ridicule from hunting buddies. The point of all this is that with today's scopes I can see equally well with the good scopes (Leupold VX3 and Vortex PST) as I can with the binocs. That's just my gear, and if I upgraded the binocs to Swarovski, maybe I'd be back to 'can't see in the scope what I can see in the Swaros').


Not my monkeys, not my circus...
Re: Leupold vs Vortex vs Nikon [Re: Arrowslinger82] #5379970 10/26/14 07:28 AM
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 478
A
Arrowslinger82 Offline OP
Bird Dog
OP Offline
Bird Dog
A
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 478
i still haven't decided, but i have been trying them out at various stores etc. right now for me... the clearest glass is leupold vx2 and nikon prostaff/monarch. i do like the vortex but in my opinion it seemed like it was not quite as crisp. also it seemed like around the edges when I'm looking through the scope that the glass has a little deflection. now i know that doesn't matter of shooting but it just bothered me.

Re: Leupold vs Vortex vs Nikon [Re: playoholic] #5380255 10/26/14 03:17 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,657
C
colt45-90 Offline
Texas colt45
Offline
Texas colt45
C
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,657
Originally Posted By: playoholic
Yep. Website says $309 on the 4-16 V-Plex.
which website?


hold on Newt, we got a runaway
Re: Leupold vs Vortex vs Nikon [Re: Arrowslinger82] #5380361 10/26/14 05:10 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,396
P
Pittstate Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
P
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,396
You have to look a the 30mm tube Vortex scopes to see the 4-16 that is $309.99. Vortex is closing out this scope/reticle combination.

http://www.cabelas.com/product/Shooting/Optics/Riflescopes%7C/pc/104792580/c/104752080/sc/104535180/Vortexreg-Viperreg-HS-30mm-Riflescopes/1394449.uts?destination=%2Fcatalog%2Fbrowse%2Friflescopes%2Fvortex%2F_%2FN-1100246%2B4294749954%2FNe-4294749954%2FNs-CATEGORY_SEQ_104535180%3FWTz_l%3DSBC%253BMMcat104792580%253Bcat104752080%26WTz_st%3DGuidedNav%26WTz_stype%3DGNU&WTz_l=SBC%3BMMcat104792580%3Bcat104752080%3Bcat104535180

Re: Leupold vs Vortex vs Nikon [Re: Arrowslinger82] #5380375 10/26/14 05:21 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,396
P
Pittstate Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
P
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,396
Ok, I will put my money where my mouth is:

I got a Vortex Viper 30mm 6-24x50 with the dead hold bdc reticle that I will trade anyone for a newer Leupold VX3 (needs to be 3.5x10 or 4.5x14 power).


Vortex are good scopes, but not even in the same conversation as Leupold, Swaro or Night Force.

I have spent countless hours out my back door at last light to test scopes, it isn't funny. A $200 Nikon Buckmaster was so noticeably better in this situation than a $600 Vortex. The same Nikon smoked the Zeiss Terra as well! Now, the Swaro and Leupold smashed the Nikon. I have posted my test results a couple times, so I am going to stop now.

Page 2 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3