texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
dhuffman, Palmera, korbin blackmon, EDMUNDO, Bbright
72166 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,817
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,633
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 44,262
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics539,546
Posts9,750,865
Members87,166
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
.308 vs 30-06 #4037282 02/09/13 10:59 AM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,420
D
Dave Davidson Offline OP
THF Trophy Hunter
OP Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
D
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,420
This has probably been cussed and discussed quite often. I have seen reputable shooters here recommend a .308. I know that a 30-06 has a larger variety of factory made ammo.

So why would anybody recommend a .308 over a 30-06? What will a .308 do that a 30-06 won't?


Without a sense of urgency, nothing ever happens.

Boy, if I say "sic em", you'd better look for something to bite. Sam Shelley, Rancher Muleshoe Texas 1892-1985 RIP
Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: Dave Davidson] #4037291 02/09/13 11:37 AM
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,001
D
dieselgeek Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
D
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,001
What are you using it for?

I shoot .308 because it's a short action, easy to load for, easy to find components for and I use it for shooting long range matches and practicing.


I don't think you gain much by shooting 30-06 ballistically.

Last edited by dieselgeek; 02/09/13 11:39 AM.
Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: dieselgeek] #4037321 02/09/13 12:49 PM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,276
W
wp75169 Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
W
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,276
Originally Posted By: dieselgeek



I don't think you gain much by shooting 30-06 ballistically.



Yes you do. Recoil.

Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: wp75169] #4037329 02/09/13 12:57 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 16
R
runnin2live Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
R
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 16
The .308 is a very predictable round. Velocity/powder charge go hand in hand with the bullet weight. With the 30-06, this is not as predictable. The 30-06 is a great round, but long action vs short can be a draw back as well.

Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: runnin2live] #4037347 02/09/13 01:15 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,052
H
hoss77 Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
H
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,052
Originally Posted By: runnin2live
The .308 is a very predictable round. Velocity/powder charge go hand in hand with the bullet weight. With the 30-06, this is not as predictable. The 30-06 is a great round, but long action vs short can be a draw back as well.
very true, if you reload the 30-06 is a GREAT rd.

Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: hoss77] #4037367 02/09/13 01:31 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,219
D
dee Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
D
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,219
For most there is a common misconception that the 308 is more accurate, which it is no more than any other cartridge.


"A vote is like a rifle; it's usefulness depends on the character of the user" Theodore Roosevelt
Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: hoss77] #4037368 02/09/13 01:31 PM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469
V
vanguard Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
V
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469
the 308 put the nail in the 30-06 coffin, back when the 06 dominated longrange shooting, the 308 came out and smacked the 30-06 like a red headed step child, so much so that the rules had to change cause of the 308, they cut the target size in half.



Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: dee] #4037372 02/09/13 01:32 PM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469
V
vanguard Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
V
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469
Originally Posted By: dee
For most there is a common misconception that the 308 is more accurate, which it is no more than any other cartridge.


wrong



Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: vanguard] #4037374 02/09/13 01:33 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,682
C
cmorsch Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
C
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,682
Ill stick with the 30-06 for hunting, I would not want to shoot a 180-210gr pill in a 308 very far, Just not enough velocity generated.

Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: vanguard] #4037379 02/09/13 01:38 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,219
D
dee Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
D
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,219
Originally Posted By: vanguard
Originally Posted By: dee
For most there is a common misconception that the 308 is more accurate, which it is no more than any other cartridge.


wrong


Have any facts to back that statement up? Most shoot the 308 for the shorter action and lighter recoil. The 06 also uses slower burn rate which requires more shooter discipline in proper follow through.

Give this a read as it is a direct comparison of the 2.

http://riflemansjournal.blogspot.com/2011/04/cartridges-sibling-rivalry-308-vs-30-06.html


"A vote is like a rifle; it's usefulness depends on the character of the user" Theodore Roosevelt
Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: dee] #4037390 02/09/13 01:50 PM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469
V
vanguard Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
V
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469
Originally Posted By: dee

Have any facts to back that statement up?


yes, history.

http://www.snipercountry.com/Articles/AccuracyFacts.asp

short cartridges are inherently more accurate, wanna know what dominates competition, all short cartridges, the most accurate 100 yd gun would be the 22 ppc.
6.5x284, 243, 308, 708,260, 6,5 creedmore, 6mm ppc, 22, ppc
all dominate and share one thing, short cartridges, they are more efficient at burn and do it consistently.
yes some cartridges are indeed more accurate than others



Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: vanguard] #4037415 02/09/13 02:00 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,219
D
dee Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
D
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,219
Originally Posted By: vanguard
Originally Posted By: dee

Have any facts to back that statement up?


yes, history.

http://www.snipercountry.com/Articles/AccuracyFacts.asp

short cartridges are inherently more accurate, wanna know what dominates competition, all short cartridges, the most accurate 100 yd gun would be the 22 ppc.
6.5x284, 243, 308, 708,260, 6,5 creedmore, 6mm ppc, 22, ppc
all dominate and share one thing, short cartridges, they are more efficient at burn and do it consistently.
yes some cartridges are indeed more accurate than others


You might want to research a little more and find some actual facts. Powder charge/ load density has more to do with accuracy than case design. Picking the right powder that fills the case the most will usually yield the best results in accuracy.

As far as the cartridges you listed 6.5-284 is run in a long action or a single shot. Jump up to F-Class open and you will find every thing from 243 to 300win mag with just about anything in between. Last record was set with a long action built 284 Winchseter with 180gr Bergers.


"A vote is like a rifle; it's usefulness depends on the character of the user" Theodore Roosevelt
Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: dee] #4037423 02/09/13 02:07 PM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469
V
vanguard Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
V
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469
Originally Posted By: dee



You might want to research a little more and find some actual facts. Powder charge/ load density has more to do with accuracy than case design.


the ppc was specifically designed for accuracy, case design does make a difference



Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: dee] #4037435 02/09/13 02:14 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,243
S
Spacemonkey Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
S
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,243
I really have no opinion on the matter as I do not shoot a .308 to compare it to my 30-06, but after reading those two articles it sound like the first one was actually written with first hand experience and extensive testing. The second article favoring the .308 seems to be written entirely on opinion and second hand knowledge. There were no actual facts or data presented in his argument. He kept refering to the shooters of the past, but presented no data of his own.

Last edited by Spacemonkey; 02/09/13 02:15 PM.
Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: Spacemonkey] #4037445 02/09/13 02:16 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,023
K
Kevin_M Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
K
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,023
popcorn

Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: Spacemonkey] #4037453 02/09/13 02:19 PM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469
V
vanguard Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
V
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469
these are the facts the 308 dominated the 30-06 in competition back in the 60s and by the 70s no one used the 30-06 any longer, the 308 shot so good they shrunk the target size in half due to not being able to break ties, those are facts.
same thing happened when the 17hmr came out it domiated rimfire matches and now i believe is only allowed in its own class.



Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: vanguard] #4037457 02/09/13 02:23 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,219
D
dee Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
D
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,219
Originally Posted By: vanguard
Originally Posted By: dee



You might want to research a little more and find some actual facts. Powder charge/ load density has more to do with accuracy than case design.


the ppc was specifically designed for accuracy, case design does make a difference


It is the smallest part of the equation, 90% of shooters can't shoot the difference to notice even in rail gun configurations.


"A vote is like a rifle; it's usefulness depends on the character of the user" Theodore Roosevelt
Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: vanguard] #4037459 02/09/13 02:24 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,243
S
Spacemonkey Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
S
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,243
I'd be interested to read them if you have the links? Recent data would be of interest to me too as much has changed since the 60's as well.

Last edited by Spacemonkey; 02/09/13 02:38 PM.
Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: dee] #4037460 02/09/13 02:25 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,243
S
Spacemonkey Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
S
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,243
Originally Posted By: dee
Originally Posted By: vanguard
Originally Posted By: dee



You might want to research a little more and find some actual facts. Powder charge/ load density has more to do with accuracy than case design.


the ppc was specifically designed for accuracy, case design does make a difference


It is the smallest part of the equation, 90% of shooters can't shoot the difference to notice even in rail gun configurations.


I agree. Myself included.

Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: dee] #4037480 02/09/13 02:38 PM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469
V
vanguard Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
V
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,469
Originally Posted By: dee
Originally Posted By: vanguard
Originally Posted By: dee



You might want to research a little more and find some actual facts. Powder charge/ load density has more to do with accuracy than case design.


the ppc was specifically designed for accuracy, case design does make a difference


It is the smallest part of the equation, 90% of shooters can't shoot the difference to notice even in rail gun configurations.


thats a different topic, for us mortal hunters using off the shelf guns does it even matter, prolly not, but as a gambling man ill take the 308 over the 06 because odds are youll end up with a good shooting gun, seen to many guns not shoot worth a darn, the 308 isnt on that list that i have seen.



Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: vanguard] #4037562 02/09/13 03:10 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,219
D
dee Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
D
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,219
In a hunting rifle you will never know the difference besides with the greater recoil the 06 might be a bit harder for some not to develop a flinch. I've never personally seen one of either that wouldn't shoot good.


"A vote is like a rifle; it's usefulness depends on the character of the user" Theodore Roosevelt
Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: vanguard] #4037565 02/09/13 03:11 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 13,530
H
Hunt n Fish Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
H
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 13,530
Now if you can just find ammo for the .308! Might just have to dig out my old .06...

popcorn

(at least I've got plenty of brass, bullets, powder & primers)


HnF

"Prayer is when you talk to the Lord, Meditation is when you listen to what he says"
Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: Hunt n Fish] #4037583 02/09/13 03:19 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 18,992
C
ChadTRG42 Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
C
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 18,992
It's a simple answer. The '06 can push the exact same .308 bullet about 150 to 200 fps faster than a 308 Win. More speed equals more energy, less drop and less wind drift. More speed also means more recoil. Simple.


[Linked Image]
Custom and Precision Ammunition!!
https://DallasReloads.com/
Type 01 and Type 06 FFL
Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: Hunt n Fish] #4037586 02/09/13 03:20 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,243
S
Spacemonkey Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
S
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,243
Originally Posted By: Hunt n Fish
Now if you can just find ammo for the .308! Might just have to dig out my old .06...

popcorn

(at least I've got plenty of brass, bullets, powder & primers)



Yeah no kidding. I'm glad there isn't any ammo I need at all right now.

Re: .308 vs 30-06 [Re: ChadTRG42] #4037684 02/09/13 04:00 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 13,530
H
Hunt n Fish Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
H
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 13,530
Originally Posted By: ChadTRG42
It's a simple answer. The '06 can push the exact same .308 bullet about 150 to 200 fps faster than a 308 Win. More speed equals more energy, less drop and less wind drift. More speed also means more recoil. Simple.


Stop confusing us with facts. You're killing a good argument!

rofl up


HnF

"Prayer is when you talk to the Lord, Meditation is when you listen to what he says"
Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3